Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


Memorandum by North Dorset District Council (RC 27)

1.  INTRODUCTION

  North Dorset is a largely unspoilt rural District embracing five market towns of Blandford Forum, Shaftesbury, Gillingham, Sturminster Newton and Stalbridge and covering approximately 235 square miles. The population is approximately 62,000 and this figure has increased significantly in recent years and it is likely to continue increasing. The number of residential properties is 29,145.

  To date North Dorset District Council has achieved one of the highest recycling rates in Dorset. This has been achieved through a network of bring banks and a comprehensive kerbside collection scheme for dry recyclables. Residual waste is collected weekly in black sacks.

  In March 2006 a pilot wheeled bin collection scheme was implemented to 6,000 households in the district enabling the separate collection of food waste and cardboard. The scheme has been designed to focus on waste minimisation by limiting the capacity for residual waste disposal to only 140 litre once a fortnight with a strict no side-waste policy. The scheme is consistently achieving recycling rates of around 65% and we feel it represents a model of best practice nationally.

2.  COLLECTION METHODS—CONTRIBUTION TO WASTE MINIMISATION

  In March 2006 NDDC implemented a pilot wheeled bin collection scheme to 6,000 properties with the aim of reducing the amount of waste generated and diverting significant amounts of organic waste from landfill.

  The North Dorset town of Gillingham and the surrounding villages of Bourton, Silton, Milton on Stour, Motcombe and Huntingford were selected for the pilot scheme. The area is very rural however the main town, Gillingham, is one of the fastest growing in the Country, with the population increasing by over 30% of the past 10 years.

  The pilot scheme was developed by a cross party member working group and was supported by ROTATE.

  Each property in the pilot area receives the following services:-

    —  Weekly collection of all food waste, cardboard and non-recyclable paper/tissue from a 140 litre wheeled bin.

    —  Fortnightly collection of dry recyclables (plastic bottles, cans, papers, and majority of properties can also recycle glass) from a 55 litre green box.

    —  Fortnightly collection of residual waste from a 140 litre wheeled bin.

  To support the scheme and maximise waste minimisation a no side waste policy was implemented. Residents do however have the option of purchasing additional residual waste capacity by buying additional waste sacks at £1 each or alternatively they can rent a larger 240 litre bin (replacing the standard 140 litre) for £27.50 per year, or alternatively renting an additional 140 litre bin for £39.00 per year.

  Garden waste is not collected in the organic waste bin due to the potential for this to increase our overall waste arisings. We are currently in the top quartile for waste arisings. Instead members felt that it was important for the Council to promote home composting as a key waste reduction activity. The issue of whether or not to include garden waste in the brown bins is currently being debated at Dorset Waste Management meetings. We are looking for evidence to support adding it to the scheme without increasing overall waste arisings. Its addition would make our collection rounds more cost effective and increase performance.

  The pilot scheme has now been operating for over a year with excellent results. The recycling rate in the area has consistently achieved 65%.

  By severely restricting the size of the residual waste bin and its collection frequency the scheme has ensured that the maximum amount of organic waste and dry recyclate are diverted from the waste stream for recycling or composting.

  The Council has recently conducted a survey of resident's attitudes to the pilot scheme. The results of which have been extremely positive with over 90% agreeing that the pilot scheme should be extended across the District to help meet future recycling targets. A copy of the report is attached as appendix 1.[12]

  Unfortunately we do not currently have information on the comparisons of waste arisings between the pilot scheme and other areas in the District however this can be provided at a later date if required.

Barriers to Extending the Scheme

    —  The scheme has cross party member support and NDDC would like to see it extended to all properties in the District. Funding is crucial to this and due to the capping of council tax it is not possible for us to raise the funds required. This Council has one of the lowest rates of council tax in the Country (Band D 2005-06 £84 compared to national average of £154). Due to capping of council tax for the past three years the Council is having to progressively shed all it's funding of discretionary services as well as having to make unheard-of economies in its statutory services.

    —  North Dorset is a very rural district with a dispersed population giving rise to poor access to services and increased collection costs.

    —  The location, design and capacity of delivery/tipping facilities has a significant impact on the cost effectiveness and affordability of collection systems. The current facilities available to us are not sufficient for our current service level, let alone capable of meeting future requirements.

    —  Uncertainty over future targets/national strategy.

3.  JOINT WORKING

    —  The Dorset authorities have always had a strong partnership in waste and recycling. Our joint Municipal Waste Strategy was agreed in 2002. The Dorset authorities waste managers meet regularly at the Waste Strategy Implementation Group and recycling officers at the Dorset Recycling & Reduction Group (DRRG). Many waste minimisation projects are jointly delivered through the DRRG including home composting, real nappies, community composting, recycling champions and commercial waste recycling.

    —  The Dorset authorities are currently exploring options for joint service delivery under potential Dorset-wide Pathfinder application. This is including investigations into authorities adopting a cluster approach and also a single waste authority option.

4.  INFORMATION PROGRAMMES

  The Dorset authorities already invest significant time and resources into the promotion of waste minimisation activities. We currently have a project ongoing in partnership with Defra monitoring and evaluating waste prevention activities in Dorset. This has been running from June 2005 and will finish in March 2008. Dorset is also a partner in the WRAP home composting scheme. Wherever possible we work in partnership with community organisation such as Your Choice furniture recycling/reuse project and WISH who carry out collections of garden waste from residents and operate a community composting facility.

  Need for national campaigns to educate and enforce positive messages:

    —  Providing positive and factual messages to public about waste minimisation activities such as smart shopping, junk mail, real nappies etc. A national campaign tackling these issues would support local authorities.

    —  Central organisation to deal with media enquiries to help counter negative press attention on waste/recycling which is having seriously detrimental effect on public perception of schemes.

    —  Tackling packing waste at producer level.

    —  Educating businesses about their own responsibilities for waste disposal.

    —  Additional funding for direct communication activities such as door knocking.

5.  TECHNOLOGY

  Currently no way to compact plastic bottles on kerbside sort vehicles makes collection very expensive. New technology to compact bulky lightweight materials would make rounds much more cost effective.

6.  PLANNING

  Due to the high quality landscape in Dorset illustrated by the range of environmental designations eg AONB's the opportunity to provide new infrastructure to facilitate improved storage, treatment and disposal of waste are limited. In view of these restrictions identifying opportunities and providing new facilities is likely to be long term with no immediate alternatives available.

  This is a particular problem in rural areas such as ours as long distances to tipping facilities has a direct impact on the cost effectiveness and affordability of new and existing collection schemes.

7.  FINANCING

  North Dorset is facing severe financial constraints described above and ever increasing targets and responsibilities are adding additional burden without additional funding becoming available. Additionally, any external funding that we are successful in attaining has to date been pump-priming capital. There has been no assistance toward the ongoing running costs of the scheme. However, in spite of these difficulties maximising recycling rates and diverting material from landfill have always been high priorities for this council with cross party member support.

  Rural councils face additional burdens as collection costs in rural districts tend to be above average due to the larger distances involved in collecting and tipping waste and the dispersed nature of the population. For the same reasons collection rounds tend to be less cost effective compared to more urban areas.

  The pilot scheme we are currently operating limits the amount of waste residents can dispose of free of charge and in effect those that produce more waste have to pay for its disposal by purchasing additional capacity. The scheme has had a massive impact on the amount of waste diverted from landfill and maximises participation and capture rates in the dry recycling and organic waste collection schemes. We consider that the implementation of such schemes really are the key to minimising waste and encouraging residents to fully sort the waste they do generate. However, without funding becoming available we will struggle to implement this scheme District-wide.

  We agree in principle with the potential for variable charging schemes however for a small authority such as ours we can not see how implementing such a scheme could ever be feasible as the costs would be prohibitive. This may only be a possibility if a single waste authority for Dorset were put in place. We also have concerns over the effectiveness of the technologies in place to support variable charging schemes such as on-board weighing and bin lift weighting systems.





12   Not printed Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 11 October 2007