Select Committee on Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Report


Foreword



The publication of this, my fifth and final annual report to the House (covering the period 1 April 2006-31 March 2007), occurs later than usual because of the pressure of other business which had to be completed in the run-up to the 2007 summer recess.[1] This is my final report because, on 28 June, Mr Speaker announced that I will be stepping down as Commissioner at the end of the year, consequent on my appointment from 1 January 2008 to a new role as the Prime Minister's Independent Adviser on Ministerial Interests.

By then I shall have completed almost six years as Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. So this report provides a natural opportunity to look back at some of the highlights of my period of office, and forward to some of the challenges that will face my successor.

In the introduction to my first annual report, I noted that I had begun my appointment amid anxiety that the way in which my predecessor had left office had called into question public, and some parliamentary confidence in the House's arrangements for regulating standards of conduct among its Members. I hope that I am able to leave office with that confidence in large measure restored: confidence among the public that expected standards are being upheld effectively; confidence among Members that they are being upheld fairly and proportionately.

Throughout the past five years I have sought to take an approach to my role which is both strategic and proportionate: strategic in the sense that it is proactive and focuses on the key issues; proportionate in that both policy matters and individual cases are handled in a manner appropriate to the intrinsic weight of the issues at stake. This has meant:

  • taking opportunities to strengthen the systems for sustaining high standards among Members
  • putting more emphasis on preventing problems before they arise - with the aim of fostering a culture of compliance with the House's rules - rather than simply picking up the pieces afterwards
  • being as open as possible about the processes and procedures allowed, while preserving a proper confidentiality about the investigation of individual cases.

In the final section of this report, I summarise some of the progress made in each of these respects over the last five years, and identify some of the remaining challenges.

The past year has seen its fair share of successes and challenges too. Progress was made towards:

  • reviewing and updating the Guide to the Rules relating to the Conduct of Members
  • enabling the future development of a one-stop registration arrangement for Members
  • providing more frequent publication of the Register of Members' Interests
  • strengthening the rules relating to the regulation of All Party Groups
  • improving regulation of the use of certain facilities and allowances provided to Members by the House.

The principal challenges were created by a significant rise in the number of complaints against Members falling within the scope of the Code of Conduct. A major contributory factor in this was a series of linked complaints by two Members, against an eventual total of 25 other Members, concerning the alleged use of the House's private dining facilities for the purposes of party fundraising. Ten formal reports (including a major one on this series of complaints) were made to the Committee on Standards and Privileges in the course of the year and ten more minor complaints (mostly concerning the alleged misuse of House stationery) were handled without a formal report under the so-called 'rectification' procedure. In addition a major inquiry begun four years ago was pushed near to completion.[2]

2006-07 was therefore an exceptionally busy year for the Committee on Standards and Privileges and for the staff of my own small office. Any progress we made during that year, as in previous years, was due to the efforts of everyone concerned. In presenting this, my final report to the House, it is fitting that I should pay tribute to the Chairman, members and successive Clerks of the Committee, and to my colleagues in my own office and throughout the House, as well as to my predecessors, without whose commitment to the House's good name and reputation none of the progress described would have occurred.



October 2007  

Sir Philip Mawer




1   Notably the preparation and submission of my memorandum on the Conduct of Mr George Galloway - see the Sixth Report of the Committee on Standards and Privileges of Session 2006-07 (HC 909) Back

2   Ibid Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 25 October 2007