Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Written Evidence


Evidence submitted by Local Government Association Independent Group

  State funding of political parties often assumes that candidates only emerge from three kennels—this is not true. The Independent as a political phenomenon has survived against the might of the party machines for a number of years.

  There is a role for political parties but it should not be seen as the be all and end all of a live democracy. There are over 2,000 Independent councillors elected to councils up and down the country. Independents are elected to both the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly. Four out of the 12 directly elected Mayors are Independent. Let's not forget that Ken Livingstone was elected first time round as Mayor of London as an Independent candidate. Last year 341,753 votes were cast for Independent candidates in the local elections.

  Any consideration of State funding must not focus on Parties, but must ensure that all those who, for whatever motive or reason, wish to engage in the process of governance via the ballot box must have equal opportunity to do so, and equal opportunity to gain access to any resources. The "three main political parties" must never be allowed to get into the position where they not only fight for "control" of Parliament but where they also gain control over the electoral process itself by being State funded.

  Some commentators believe that state funding will "clean up" politics by freeing the parties from the dependence on donations by big business and the trade unions. However countries where state funding already exists are hardly corruption free. Politicians in France and Germany have been smeared by party fundraising scandals over recent years.

  A system based on political representation—by number of MPs or total votes cast—invokes the same problems as Britain's "first-past-the-post" voting system, essentially a vicious circle for smaller parties and Independents unable to receive funding because the have no MPs, and unable to push candidates because they lack the funding.

  The tradition of the Independent in local government (and in Parliament) is both a long and honourable one, and one, which, if you actually talk to local electors, is seen as desirable in achieving community representation in democratic arenas. Most electors tend to be resigned to the fact that political parties fight local and national elections, but they don't always like it, and will support good Independents every time—"there shouldn't be party politics in local government" is what they say.

  With the three main parties seeing a gradual decline in the number of people joining as members; subscriptions have fallen and it is big business and union subs that are keeping the parties afloat In the wake of the embarrassing honours for loans affair we need to ensure that we do not rush into a system of state funding. Although it would help parties reduce their reliance on individual donors, it could create more problems than it actually solves.

  Democracy is diverse. If we want to encourage participation in it and respect the views of independents and minorities— as that is what they will often be—it behoves to the government to ensure that they are able to communicate with the electorate and have the resources to promote an alternative view.

  From our experience the Government and the three main political parties have demonstrated a complete lack of understanding about non-partisan politics. The government has consistently stated that "A person standing as an Independent should play the same game as everyone else", but what they don't seem to understand is that Independents are not like everyone else. They do not have the party to fall back on and provide them with financial support with teams of political advisors, policy departments and advertising gurus.

  It would be quiet wrong for an Independent candidate to stand only to find that his own hard earned taxes have been used to fund candidates to fight against him in an election.

  The Government should acknowledge that one legitimate element of the political spectrum is the non-partisan Independent discipline, which persistently finds favour with a significant portion of the electorate, and that, if funding is to be made available, then funding should also be available to promote and develop the Independent case.

  If the political parties cannot reach a consensus on a model of party funding that is equitable to all, then I am afraid the political parties must continue to seek their own fortunes and rely less on subsidies from the tax payers of this country.

Local Government Association Independent Group

March 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 20 December 2006