Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 300-304)

RT HON JACK STRAW MP

4 JULY 2006

  Q300  Keith Vaz: So, you have changed your mind since then?

  Mr Straw: Yes. I was and remain against an all-elected chamber. I have no visceral feeling about a mixed chamber, but you will remember how the voting went.

  Q301  Chairman: I remember how the Prime Minister proceeded at the time.

  Mr Straw: I had just got off a plane.

  Q302  Chairman: You followed the Prime Minister. To see him go into the lobby was such a rare sight that you decided to join him?

  Mr Straw: Chairman, though my respect and admiration for the Prime Minister knows no bounds, give me the credit of suggesting that I made up my own mind in voting on the issue.

  Q303  James Brokenshire: You referred to consultation. What is the current timetable that you are working towards in terms of consultation and then action?

  Mr Straw: I am working towards the turn of the year which would fit in with the timescale for the Joint Committee. The original resolution passed on 10 May to report by the Summer Recess, i.e. three weeks' time, was unrealistic given the point at which it was appointed. A resolution has already been through the Lords, which I believe is due to be voted on by the House of Commons tomorrow, to agree an extension to the end of this session, which is late October or early November, for the Joint Committee. My aim is to produce a White Paper at the turn of the year on composition which will obviously take account of the Committee's report. As to consultation, the Lord Chancellor had a working party or informal group of representatives of the other two main political parties, cross-benchers and bishops, and I am continuing that. We have a programme of meetings and work to see whether we can find a consensus. My opinion is that after all these years of going round and round the track and examining it we have to make a decision. Either we go for a reform which will not be perfect or what everybody wants but it will be a change that perhaps can stand for 30 or 40 years or both parliamentary and public patience will be exhausted and people will want to move on, so I need to give it my best shot.

  Q304  Chairman: I should have declared an interest in this part of the discussion because my wife is a Member of the House of Lords. I am sorry that I failed to do so.

  Mr Straw: We probably all aspire to go there, so that is a bigger interest.

  Chairman: I thank our witness and colleagues in enabling the Committee to get through this session. The vote has not yet occurred but I believe it will be fairly soon. We are very glad to see you and expect to discuss this matter with you again at a later date.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 20 December 2006