Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs First Special Report


1  Party Funding - Oral evidence from the Lord Chancellor on the role of the Attorney General


1. In the course of our inquiry into Party Funding[1] Mr Andrew Tyrie asked the Lord Chancellor the following question relating to any possible prosecutions arising from the police inquiry into allegations of the sale of public honours and other matters:

".. can you give the public an assurance that the Attorney General will not interfere in any way with the conclusions of the DPP and that the DPP would be permitted, were there to be something brought to him, to take any decisions for prosecution wholly independent of the Attorney General?"

The Lord Chancellor replied:

"Of course. It is a matter for the DPP and the Crown Prosecution Service to make decisions in relation to this in the normal way and, of course, the Attorney General would not interfere in the normal course of decisions being made."[2]

2. In the light of later public statements made by the Attorney General about his duties in relation to decisions about prosecutions arising from the police inquiry, the Chairman of the Committee wrote to the Lord Chancellor seeking clarification of his answer. We received a letter in reply from the Lord Chancellor and also subsequently received from the Attorney General further correspondence which we now report to the House. We draw particular attention to the Attorney General's statement in his letter of 7th December in relation to his duties (including decisions about prosecutions) which fall outside the usual ambit of collective responsibility:

"However, I know the Lord Chancellor well understands that he was not in a position to give an 'assurance', as you have termed it, as to how I would act. No other Minister, however distinguished or senior, has the ability to bind the Attorney General in how he exercises his role."[3]

3. We have announced a wider inquiry into the constitutional role of the Attorney General, but consider that the House would wish to see this correspondence in advance of that inquiry.


1   Constitutional Affairs Committee, Party Funding, First Report of Session 2006 - 07, HC 163 -I & -II Back

2   Q 97 Back

3   See page 6 of this report Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 19 January 2007