Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Written Evidence


Evidence submitted by Helen Cousins on behalf of a criminal defence solicitor (LAR 233)

  It is with a heavy heart that I write this.

  My partnership met a week ago and made the decision that we would withdraw from all legal aid (with the exception of a small amount of MIIRT). The effect of this is that we will be giving notice in relation to our crime and family categories and that we will cease taking on new legal aid work in those categories from 1 April.

  What finally did it for me, as I flared in to the black hole of the combined effect of Carter and means testing, was the seeming impossibility of maintaining the reputation that I, my team and the many others who had gone before us had built up with the court and other CA players in this brave new world which expected so much for so little reward.

  I fervently hope that all the activity of the profession over the next weeks and months will achieve some real benefits to enable the scheme to work more in the interests of the profession but my doubts are made clear by the action we have decided to take.

  I have no doubt that some will view with disdain the fact that we are turning our back at a time when the profession most needs help. For that I am profoundly sorry. This was the most difficult decision I have ever had to make and I have agonised over it for some months.

  Two weeks ago, I received an email from a lady who had emigrated to New Zealand and had seen my name recently and just had to write and thank me for saving her life 15 years ago when she was 17. She sent me pictures of her family and her home and wanted me to know that she was now a successful executive with her own business. She phoned me as well the next day to continue her thanks. She could not have been more different from the 17 year old junkie who ,if she was not on the streets at that moment in her life, was only one fix away from it. I represented her on legal aid. As you can imagine, that did not make our decision any easier to make.

  My firm will continue to represent those investigated and charged with offences and will do so in the forthright and independent but courteous manner which has been our trade mark these many years past (but which was in real danger of being subsumed by the general air of demoralisation that pervades the courts at the moment). We will charge for our services and bill at the going rate. We know we are taking a risk (and it may be a big one) but we have decided that now is the time to act before Legal Aid finally withers and while our reputation is still intact (or just about!). I have also decided to try and keep my tern together which we acknowledge, represents another significant risk.

  Through thick and thin (and the going has not always boon straight forward) my partners have kept the faith while all similar practices In our town abandoned legal aid some years ago. Now we collectively take the view that we have no option but to move away and to break a hitherto central tenet of our firm's ethos (that we would represent all people who requested our services—whoever they Wife and what ova' sort of problems they may have had).

  Please do not think too ill of me. I have given my all over the last 19 years to the service of two who cannot speak (and generally cannot think) for themselves and, to be honest, I have just had enough of me and mine being treated with contempt by those who should know better.

February 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 1 May 2007