Select Committee on Constitution Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Ministry of Justice (formerly the Department for Constitutional Affairs)

REFORM OF THE CORONER SYSTEM

  When Harriet Harman gave evidence to you on 8 May 2007, she said we are looking at the possibility of appointing a shadow Chief Coroner in advance of the Coroners Bill. The idea was to provide national leadership to coroners and to drive forward a number of short-term reforms that could be achieved without legislation.

  I have looked at this proposal in more detail and it has become clear that until the Coroners Bill is enacted, it would not be possible to discharge the most valuable functions of the office such as hearing appeals, investigating complaints or reallocating work between coroner areas. While the remaining advisory role is important, it is also fairly restricted and my view is that a shadow appointee would not make a meaningful impact on the system.

  In addition, discussions with the Coroners Society suggested that coroners were unlikely to support a non-statutory appointment. They argued that there would be significant duplication between the shadow role and the current remit of the Society and other advisory groups. They were also uncomfortable with the idea of a non-statutory Chief Coroner, who could be seen to act on behalf of the Government, directing how coroners should act.

  As you know the Coroners Bill was included in the draft legislative programme announced to Parliament on 11 July. Rather than appointing a shadow Chief Coroner I propose to focus efforts on the Bill and preparing for implementation, which might include the appointment of a Chief Coroner to assist with this as soon as possible after Royal Assent. I also intend to work directly with coroners to introduce some of the reforms that Harriet mentioned to your Committee on 8 May and other measures that could benefit current service. For example, officials are already working with the Coroners Society to develop new measures to make more effective use of coroners' reports in order to prevent future deaths (Rule 43 reports).

  Finally, and on a different matter, I have recently published a short consultation paper on the recommendation you made in your coroner inquiry report about placing a statutory duty on doctors to report deaths to coroners. Copies of the paper have been sent to your officials.

Bridget Prentice MP

Parliamentary Under Secretary of State

Ministry of Justice

August 2007





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 18 April 2008