Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 500 - 519)

  500. In order to get at the number who use ticket hall C, part of that number of 23,550 that I mentioned a moment ago, do we see that in column C, line three?
  (Mr Weiss) Yes, absolutely. You need to add the two figures to come to the larger figure that you came to.

  501. Yes, and there are also 300-odd who appear to use ticket hall A, as we see from column C at line one. If you would now turn to the 42,000 National Rail passengers who exit the station, they are, of course, not the only ones who exit the station. Who else do the Committee need to concentrate on?
  (Mr Weiss) We need to concentrate on the National Rail passengers who use London Underground and ticket hall C.

  502. What I am inviting you to do is go back to table 1 to identify the numbers of passengers who are exiting the station altogether in 2001. We have got the 42,200 National Rail passengers. What are the other two components of the total number that you mentioned earlier of 68,300?
  (Mr Weiss) If I draw the Committee's attention to column B, lines two and three, you have the two figures of 15,300 and 10,800 of those people who are leaving the station but arriving respectively from the Central line and the subsurface lines.

  503. Anyone can see, but I will just mention it for the record, that those numbers total 26,100; is that right?
  (Mr Weiss) That is correct.

  504. I mentioned earlier that 68,300 passengers therefore exit the station in the morning peak. That is table 1. We see that at column B, line five. So that the Committee can then get a feel for where it is that these 68,300 exiting passengers actually go, would it be helpful to turn up your exhibit A, which is the same document, sir, that I introduced in opening, and it looks like this (indicating) and which you will find in the City of London bundle of exhibits at tab 16?[3]

  The Committee suspended from 3.02 pm to 3.15 pm for a division in the House

  505. Mr Laurence: Mr Weiss, I was asking you about that number of 68,300 exiting passengers comprising partly National Rail passengers and the remainder people coming of the Underground, and I was inviting the Committee's attention to exhibit A with a view to marking the exits. The Octagon Arcade—can we call that number 1, the way out to Broadgate? Over on the other side, the way out to Bishopsgate—can we call that number 2? Exits 3A and 3B, respectively the escalator and the stairs, shown as a way out to Old Broad Street: that also leads to Liverpool Street, I think.

  (Mr Weiss) If I may explain for the benefit of the members, I have said "Old Broad Street". It is actually obliquely the other side of Liverpool Street. Liverpool Street, of course, is an east-west street that goes not only in front of Liverpool Street station but alongside the building in front, so to avoid confusion we have called it Old Broad Street, but technically it leads to Liverpool Street first.

  506. Then, although not shown on your drawing, Mr Weiss, so that the Committee can follow the numbers you are about to give them, exits 4 and 5 are at a higher level, are they not, and are respectively exits to the bus station and an exit towards Sun Street?
  (Mr Weiss) That is correct.

  507. In order therefore just for the Committee to get a feel, although they would have got that this morning already, of how the exiting passengers that we have been talking about reach the street via these various exits, did you have recourse to the numbers given in the Liverpool Street Interchange Study of 2002?
  (Mr Weiss) We did, sir. We did this study because as a local authority, conscious of the very large numbers of people who have business in and around the station, reminding ourselves that we have no real business in the station as a local authority, our control really stops at the edge, we were looking to find out how best to accommodate interchange in the public realm, and this is cycling, walking, buses, mobility impaired, so that those people leaving the station by whatever mode and with whatever needs were properly provided for.

  508. So give the Committee if you would, by reference to those various exit numbers, the figures thrown up by that study.
  (Mr Weiss) Certainly. Exit 1, which is to the west, the Octagon Arcade, some 21,000 people went there in the morning peak. Exit 2 towards Bishopsgate, which is to the right, this is the exit to the east, some 25,000, the largest element by far. Exit 3A, which is the escalator, 8,000 used that. Next door to and leading to the same destination as the escalator on 3B, the stairs took 7,300. Exits 4 and 5 together were running at about 3,800. This totals a figure of 65,100. It does not equate exactly to the CLRL figure as used in their matrices of 68,300 but, being based on 2002, the relationship between the splits and the approximate figure remain the same, so the principle of where people wanted to go to stands with what CLRL produced and that which we observed independently in 2002.

  509. What is the real purpose of giving the Committee those numbers?
  (Mr Weiss) We are dealing with exit flows of 21,000 and 25,000 to discrete areas—the sheer business and usage that large numbers of people regularly, each and every weekday, using the station.

  510. Finally, on these numbers that involve the use of the tables that I handed in in my opening, and the 2001 table in particular, Mr Weiss, would you like to say something about the figures that are relevant as illustrating how many passengers use London Underground?
  (Mr Weiss) If we go to table 1, London Underground is used by 26,100. To remind the Committee, this is column B, lines two and three.

  511. That is those who exit the street. What about those who enter the Underground system, where do we need to look for that figure?
  (Mr Weiss) There are 23,500 entering the system. This is table 4.

  512. Table 2, I think. Sorry to correct you.
  (Mr Weiss) Table 2, column B.

  513. 23,500?
  (Mr Weiss) Correct.

  514. By my arithmetic, a total of 49,650 people in the morning peak using the Underground system. If we then want to know in relation to that how many use ticket hall B, let us take those who exit first, what is the number?
  (Mr Weiss) If we turn to column 4.

  515. Table 4.
  (Mr Weiss) My apologies, table 4. We look at the exits, ticket hall B, which is the second line down running horizontally, we can see some 9,000 leaving ticket hall B, 18,100 entering ticket hall C, 9,600 exiting.

  516. Total for ticket hall B, including the 4,200 who interchange, 31,300 out of a total of 53,850 for all three ticket halls?
  (Mr Weiss) That is correct. Once again, this is stressing the relationship of how much busier ticket hall B is than ticket hall A or ticket hall C.

  517. Turning back to your proof of evidence please at 2.2.3, I do not think we have got any tables to illustrate this but can you tell the Committee what the corresponding figure for use of the Underground station is in the evening peak?
  (Mr Weiss) Certainly, Sir. The corresponding figure for the use of the Underground station in the evening peak is slightly larger at 52,000 passengers.

  518. Mr Liddell-Grainger: Can we ask where that is in the submission, Mr Laurence?

  519. Mr Laurence: You do not have that number on the table, Sir. It is just to get a feel for what the position is in the evening as compared with the morning peak.


3   Committee Ref: A2, British Land plc-Liverpool Street Station Plans-Exhibit A (LONDLB-26-003). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007