Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 2680 - 2699)

  2680. Chairman: Can I ask that at some point in the future, Mr Morton, you can get us a revised drawing of this which rectifies the mistake?

   (Mr Morton) Of course.

  2681. Mr Honey: That is a matter I will deal with in re-examination. For the avoidance of doubt, I will make it clear that we do not think there is a mistake.

  2682. Chairman: I am just referring to the witness.

  2683. Ms Lieven: It is quite important, sir, that we know if there is a disagreement between counsel because we need to work on the drawings that are correct.

  2684. Chairman: The reason I referred to it was because the witness gave evidence that it was a mistake. Therefore, I wanted the new plan showing no mistakes to be put in front of the Committee. If you have a different view on that, you can perhaps make it clear in your rejoinder this afternoon. We will return at 2.30.

After a short adjournment

  2685. Ms Lieven: Sir, before I return to cross-examining Mr Morton, the undertaking which I read out this morning is being passed round. Mr Morton, could we go back to your options and use your tab 7 as an aide memoir? All your options involve a pile shaft, do they not?

  (Mr Morton) No, the third option could be the segment system. What I am saying is that the third option could be exactly as shown on the drawing.

  2686. The third option is the one that lops three metres off the end of the building.

   (Mr Morton) That is right.

  2687. Let us take options 1 and 2 for a moment, the piled options. I just want to run through with you various problems associated with a site like this, a very constrained site, with piling. First of all, piles themselves are thicker than the segmented wall, are they not, so they take up more space?

   (Mr Morton) Yes, 1.2 metres diameter.

  2688. Once you have put the piles in you then have to line the shaft as well.

   (Mr Morton) Yes, you do.

  2689. So what that means is that the total diameter of a shaft has to be bigger with your options than it does with a segmented shaft.

   (Mr Morton) That is exactly right.

  2690. Obviously that is a disadvantage on what I think we can all agree is a highly constrained site.

   (Mr Morton) It is certainly a disadvantage, but if it were possible to move the shaft as I have suggested then a particular amount of that would be taken up in that way.

  2691. That is option 1?

   (Mr Morton) Yes.

  2692. What it means by having a bigger shaft is that you are taking up more of what little extra space you gain.

   (Mr Morton) That is true enough, yes.

  2693. In terms of the construction plant that you need for piling, you need the crane, which you need for a segmented shaft as well, but you also need a piling rig.

   (Mr Morton) Yes.

  2694. And you need to have on the site not just all the piles but also the reinforcement cages.

   (Mr Morton) Yes.

  2695. And piles and the reinforcement cages are pretty big bits of kit, something in the region of eight metres long, I am instructed.

   (Mr Morton) That sort of order.

  2696. So you have to find space for all those sorts of things on the site. We will come to the space allowance in a minute. The other issue with piling, if you pile this shaft down 22 metres you then have to break through the piles at the bottom to get into the adits, do you not?

   (Mr Morton) Yes, you do but that was taken account of in the Crossrail engineers' proposals for a rectangular shaft, which they put into their report.

  2697. It is not impossible but it will add time to the construction programme because it is more difficult to break through the piles than to go through and spray a concrete lining system, is it not?

   (Mr Morton) I do not think that is necessarily true.

  2698. You do not think it will add time?

   (Mr Morton) I do not think necessarily, no.

  2699. Then can we deal with a specific issue around piling on option 2, which is the one with the biscuit chunk taken out. We talked this morning briefly about how that option, because it had lost its circular structural stability, would require propping; do you remember we agreed that? One point I should have put to you and I did not, you suggested that the propping could be provided by building the floors and the stairs as you go down?
  (Mr Morton) That is possible, yes.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007