Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 2720 - 2739)

  2720. I will come back to whether you can use the building, if I may, when we go through the options. Then moving around the site you have relatively small things like the fan and the ladder bay, but we probably do not need to worry about those too much. But you need to have a generator, fuel for the generator and a compressor, do you not?

   (Mr Morton) Yes, you do.

  2721. None of those, as it were, are optional extras. Then up here we come to the cement silo and the washout skip. Because of the adit, the chamber and the shaft downstairs—I will call it downstairs—in the underground part of the station, there is a very considerable amount of concrete that needs to be poured via this shaft to construct those underground works, is there not?

   (Mr Morton) Right.

  2722. So we have to have space for the cement silo and washout skip for that part of the construction.

   (Mr Morton) That is the most economic way of doing it but it could be done with pumped concrete being delivered to the site.

  2723. What would be the cost implications of that?

   (Mr Morton) Significant.

  2724. I am also instructed by Mr Berryman that to do a pumped concrete solution with spray concrete lining is technically extremely difficult; I do not know whether that falls within your expertise?

   (Mr Morton) It is horses for courses; some systems work in some instances and others work in others. You could use either system.

  2725. If you were going to construct this by methods of piling rather than segmented shaft then also on that site we would need the piling rig and the reinforcement cage and the piles themselves; yes? They are not shown on this plan because we were not proposing to do it that way, but you would need to find space for those as well, would you not?

   (Mr Morton) Unless they are delivered as required, and I see that you have space for storing the segments, which could be part of that system.

  2726. You could take up some of the segment space but the reinforcement cages and the piles would take up considerably more space that that, would they not, because they are so big?

   (Mr Morton) Not necessarily so, no; as I said, you could have these delivered to the site as work progressed, as you wanted them.

  2727. There is a phrase for it, "just in time" delivery, which has the necessary risk and cost consequences, does it not, because if the just in time lorry gets stuck in a traffic jam on Farringdon Road then you are in real trouble with your construction programme.

   (Mr Morton) Yes.

  2728. So there are risk and cost consequences of not having space on site for those items, is that right?

   (Mr Morton) One is working on a constricted site and one has to take account of those in considering the solutions to the problem.

  2729. But there is a balance to be struck: yes, we are working on a constricted site, but if you make it even more constricted then that has risk and cost consequences, does it not?

   (Mr Morton) But you have saved a devil of a lot of money by leaving the building there.

  2730. Can we just stick to what we need? The other thing that is not on here is that, going back to the underground works, it would be necessary to store on the site the tunnel segments that will be used underground to construct the adits.

   (Mr Morton) They will come at a later date when the shaft is constructed and the system is to move over the shaft and use that for storage space at that time, and there is space for dropping materials down through it.

  2731. So that is the solution you propose to that, is it?

   (Mr Morton) No, that is actually suggested in the Mott MacDonald report.

  2732. Can we turn to your plan, tab 7? You have not shown on this plan a number of the items that we have just been through, have you? So you do not, for instance, have anywhere to put the spoil that is thrown out by the piling? You do not have anywhere to load lorries, you do not have the delivery space. You simply have not done it on this plan, have you?

   (Mr Morton) We have not shown it on the plan because taking Scanmoor to the site and then looking at the site and considering the proposals, they thought that they had worked on much more constricted sites than this.

  2733. But they are not here to give evidence, are they?

   (Mr Morton) No, they are not.

  2734. And they have not produced any plan of how they would do it, have they?

   (Mr Morton) No. It is the first time I have seen the previous plan presented.

  2735. You have seen the Mott MacDonald report since last Friday, have you not?

   (Mr Morton) Yes, I have.

  2736. And we have not seen a single thing of yours since 9.30 this morning, so let us put that in context. Can I ask you to have a look at another plan we have prepared, which is P38? This is our best stab at what would happen if you retained the building. The grey is number 38. The shaft has been moved to the east on this to take advantage of the Fox and Knot Street two metres.

   (Mr Morton) Right.

  2737. So we are, as it were, maximising our use of the site, and what we have done is laid out the things from the previous plan that we have agreed we need on the site, and on the right hand side you can see those items which we have not been able to fit on. Cross out, if you would, the segments because that is a mistake there, and if I can ask the Committee to cross it out—it was an oversight. But the other items, the crane, the waste skip, the fuel generator and the washout skip, we simply have not been able to fit on to that site.

   (Mr Morton) Suddenly mysteriously at first floor level a storage structure comes out of it, stores at first floor level, and on the previous plan that you showed there was no suggestion of stores at first floor level, and you seem to have a lot more items going on to site on the second plan than you do on the first.

  2738. I do not think that is right, Mr Morton. What we have tried to do is to make the best possible use of the site in the second plan, retaining the building, so we have put the stores at the first floor level because that makes the most efficient use of the site. We have done it that way so that we can bring the lorries in underneath. I do not think we have put lots of extra bits of plant on to the second plan, but what we have shown is that there is simply nowhere to put those other items. That makes it very difficult to construct the shaft from this location, does it not?

   (Mr Morton) I think the way you have shown this on the two plans is confusing, because if you take all the coloured items on the first plan that you showed and impose those on this site again and you have the first floor stores, they all seem to go in.

  2739. No, that is not right, with respect Mr Morton. If you look in the top right hand corner we have the crane, the waste skip, the fuel tank, the generator and washout skip that we simply cannot get on the site.

   (Mr Morton) Where you have the green shaded area it says stores at first floor level, where are those stores shown on the previous plan?


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007