Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 3280 - 3299)

  3280. Who wrote the Jubilee Line Extension Environment Assessment on Noise? Was that you?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I was then a sub-consultant to Environmental Resources Limited, who wrote it. I cannot remember who wrote that bit.

  3281. Is it the picture that you came in later and modified it, saying, "What we really want is 40 because it is cheaper"?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I am not changing what is there. 35 is the lower boundary of the low impact classification. It was then; it is now and it will be, I hope, for time to come.

  3282. Let us go to the guidelines for community noise. This is a document produced by four acousticians. Am I right?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) Forgive me if I say no. I do not mean to be awkward but Professor Berglund is a psychologist.

  3283. Sorry; four individuals. He was in charge of sleep, was he?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) Brigitta is a woman.

  3284. Those are the views expressed of those four people?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) According to these pages, they are responsible for the views expressed in this document.

  3285. What we must not believe, must we, is that this is a document of World Health Organisation policy that is different, for example, to the FTA policy in most states?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) It is not World Health Organisation policy.

  3286. Could you show us, please, where the document deals with what we have been concerned about for the last two days, which is groundborne noise?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) It does not explicitly deal with groundborne noise.

  3287. It is careful to say, also, is it not, that where there was a large proportion of low frequency sounds you should look at lower guideline values?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) In giving my answer I must remind the Committee of my explanation as to what is meant by low frequency sound.

  3288. In your work have you done an investigation of any complaints on recent railways that you have promoted?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) No.

  3289. Do you accept the advice of the Wilson Committee in 1963—this is LBC30—that complaint does not always give a reliable guide to noise?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I said quite a lot about that yesterday. I use that as a basis for drawing conclusions from the London Underground information without challenging it. I have no idea if it is right but it feels reasonable.

  3290. The Wilson comment you think is right?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I am looking at LBC30 and reading about "... Only 5 to 10% of residents exposed to noise actually complain or participate in related activity".

  3291. Yes. The Wilson Committee quote at the top, do you agree with that?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I agree that complaint is a surrogate for annoyance. Everybody who is annoyed does not complain.

  3292. Good. Have you, as a result of the work and issues that you have faced over the years, done any surveys of buildings that have 35/40 to ask you what they thought?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I am wondering whether the question is about surveys in the sense of a sample population that one can treat statistically or whether I am being asked about individual cases.

  3293. No, sample population we can treat statistically.
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I have done no social surveys. I am not a surveyor, I do not have the qualifications to do that.

  3294. What we do not have in that bundle is the reality of what has happened on your CTRL at North Downs, do we?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) There is a page about the North Downs.

  3295. You know where the tunnel is, do you not?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) Yes.

  3296. You know where the local authority is, do you not?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) Tonbridge and Malling.

  3297. Yes. Did you contact them?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I have had completely unrelated contact with Tonbridge and Malling. They have been clients of mine but not about this.

  3298. Have you sought any information as to whether the 40 dB(A) on the CTRL was working?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I am party to a lot of information about these things because of my links with the railway design and construction and promotion work.

  3299. You heard what Mr Methold did, he applied a scientific method. He wrote to local authorities and asked.
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I have to say that Union Railways do not have to ask, they receive comments unsolicited. Even I have received unsolicited comments from people living above the North Downs tunnel, whether or not they knew my connection with the parliamentary proceedings or whether they just phoned me up because they found me on the internet I do not know.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007