Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 4300 - 4319)

  4300. Mr Carstairs: Thank you very much.

  4301. Chairman: Mr Mould?


Further re-examination by Mr Mould

  4302. Mr Mould: I do not want to spoil the party, and I am not looking to do so, but there are just two points, Mr Thornley-Taylor, that we need to note. First of all, if we just scroll down, please, on the IP to 2.9, the commitment that we make and which you have really applied to the current case is one that is expressed in terms of being in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances?[23]

  (Mr Thornley-Taylor) Yes.

  4303. I only make that point because the phrase used by the Petitioner just then was "100 per cent guarantee". We are not in the business of giving 100 per cent guarantees in relation to any matter. I think that is fair, is it not?
  (Mr Thornley-Taylor) Yes, and I carefully did not use 100 per cent in my comments.

  4304. Can we scroll up again, please, forgive me, the paragraph number has momentarily escaped me, but during the construction phase we have addressed in this information paper that brief period of time when the tunnel boring machine will be passing under premises which lie over the tunnels; is that right?



  (Mr Thornley-Taylor) Yes.

  4305. I think it is paragraph 2.4, just explain the position in relation to that, so there is no suggestion of any misleading going on in relation to the construction phase, please?[24]



  (Mr Thornley-Taylor) The tunnel boring machine, as we heard the last time I was in the witness chair, is likely to be audible during its passage which, for most buildings, will take place over a period of the order of a week or so.

  4306. Yes.
  (Mr Thornley-Taylor) There will be consultation with all affected people so they know when it is coming, how long it is likely to last and it will be gone. This is a transient effect which is not subject to any of the operational criteria that we have been discussing earlier.

  4307. If the Hollywood producer can be persuaded to stay away for that fortnight, all should be well?
  (Mr Thornley-Taylor) Yes.

  4308. Thank you very much. There are no further questions unless the Committee has any.

  4309. Chairman: Mr Stafford, do you want to make a closing summary?

  4310. Mr Stafford: I am afraid I do not draw a lot of comfort from the last witness statement. It is difficult for me to understand things like decibels and so on, but could I recommend that the Petitioners meet with Crossrail engineers to thrash this thing out without troubling the members today. We all want to go off and have our lunch. Would that be a possible suggestion?

  4311. Chairman: Mr Thornely-Taylor, you did indicate before that it would be helpful if you possibly could, on the undertakings in the basement foundation, meet the Petitioners at some point to talk to them.
  (Mr Thornley-Taylor) Yes, indeed, sir. In order to do what you ask which is to do a level two prediction for these premises, I would need to see these premises anyway.

  4312. Mr Stafford: Firstly, we need to establish the measure and, secondly, we need to draw up some sort of deed which will say that they will perform the task, we have a recourse.

  4313. Chairman: Mr Mould?

  4314. Mr Mould: If necessary, just to clarify the position, certainly Mr Thornely-Taylor has indicated, and I have indicated, that we will meet to investigate the building foundations and carry out the work that was mentioned earlier in relation to that. Mr Thornely-Taylor has helpfully indicated that there can be discussions about matters of concern at that time, if that would be helpful to the Petitioners. What I must make clear is that the suggestion that there should be some formal deed dealing with matters that were raised at the conclusion of Mr Stafford's presentation is not something that we consider to be necessary or appropriate and so if that is a continuing matter of dispute in the context of this Petition, then it is something the Committee will have to consider and rule upon.

  4315. Chairman: Mr Mould, can I assure you that how members of the Committee will approach it is that in negotiations between Crossrail and all Petitioners that the doors never close in that respect during the course of the Select Committee hearings. We would expect that to continue. I am not suggesting that Mr Thornley-Taylor go away and strike a deal. I have asked Mr Thornely-Taylor to make himself available to go and examine these premises. He said he has done this in other premises but not this particular one, and responded to the request of Mr Stafford to meet and discuss these things there. Again whether any settlement or a deal should be struck or not, that is really between Crossrail and the Petitioners. All we are suggesting is that it might be helpful if Mr Thornley-Taylor did both things at some point which might help in those proceedings.

  4316. Mr Mould: Forgive me, I was not intending in any way to cut across your helpful suggestion.

  4317. Chairman: Can I also assure you that we do not really see any need for Mr Stafford or Mercury Theatres to come back at any point to give us more evidence. If any evidence is needed to that effect, Crossrail will decide to notify the Committee.

  4318. Mr Mould: It did seem to me, if I may, just helpful to indicate through you—and I would have said this in my closing, but it is perhaps unnecessary to say more than that at this stage—that the arrangement for a deed that was touched on by Mr Stafford is, I think, a misunderstanding of the purpose for which the deed is being offered. It is being offered by Crossrail in the context of the settlement issues that arise; you recall it was something that was mentioned by the professor when he gave his presentation. We do not have a similar arrangement in relation to noise and vibration. The way in which we are seeking to deal with noise and vibration is as has been explained by Mr Thornley-Taylor in his evidence to you today. Subject to clarifying that, I hope for the benefit of the Petitioners then I have nothing more to say. We will seek to co-operate as far as we consider to be appropriate and necessary in order to comply with the Committee's views in relation to that.

  4319. Chairman: That is very clear to me.


23   Crossrail Information Paper D10, Groundborne Noise & Vibration; p 3, para 2.9 (LINEWD-IPD10-003). Back

24   Crossrail Information Paper D10, Groundborne Noise & Vibration; p 2, para 2.4 (LINEWD-IPD10-002). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007