Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 4420 - 4439)

  4420. The traffic is being rerouted elsewhere within the vicinity. Of course, the effect of the Charing Cross Road worksite, as I think you showed on one of your plans (it may be helpful if we turn to PRD (Petition Response Document) P57), and if we turn to the appendix in the plans, Map C5 (ix), this is the stage C in that eight-stage phase that you see.[11] You can see the Charing Cross Road worksite, the eastern worksite, is there in operation which closes off the current access arrangements to Centre Point, which you described earlier by reference to your plan. Does it not?

  (Sir Digby Jones): Yes.

  4421. So that is stage C. So that effectively remains the position throughout the following phases of the works. As you know, the permanent position is that that Plaza area to the west of Centre Point Tower, which is there largely covered by the worksite hatching, accommodates two new Crossrail underground station entrances and is then subject to landscaping and restoration to public roads.
  (Sir Digby Jones): So for five years where do I welcome a Prime Minister or a member of the Royal Family?

  4422. You understand the permanent position as well, do you not?
  (Sir Digby Jones): I do. But for five years where would I do it?

  4423. I am afraid, it is a convention and the reality is that barristers do not know and they ask questions—they cannot answer. I will leave that to Mr Harwood to pursue.
  (Sir Digby Jones): I am not going to be concerned after five years; I am concerned for the next five years.

  4424. I am going to come to that. The point I am seeking to establish is that it is clear that under this arrangement (I think you are familiar with the phased plan, as you have indicated) the effect of the works is that you lose your existing access arrangements to the west of Centre Point Tower.
  (Sir Digby Jones): On a permanent basis?

  4425. Yes.
  (Sir Digby Jones): That little part there, yes.

  4426. That includes the existing drop-off point.
  (Sir Digby Jones): Yes.

  4427. The CBI has not proposed, has it, any alternative to Crossrail's detailed phased traffic management arrangements of which this is the third phase? It has not suggested that it could be dealt with any differently or indeed with any less impact on surrounding occupiers and landowners?
  (Sir Digby Jones): Well, just as it is not for barristers to do that it is not for directors general to prepare that either.

  4428. Whatever the whys and wherefores, you effectively, for these purposes, accept that Crossrail's phased arrangement is the way in which it has to be done?
  (Sir Digby Jones): To the best of my knowledge, I would say that what they are suggesting, frankly, I do not like it but what else do you do?

  4429. Quite so. A very fair answer, if I may say so. One feature of these plans, as we can see from this plan, is that St Giles High Street, which you can see running up from the south-eastern corner of this plan on a north-westerly axis and then straight as it comes past the eastern side of Centre Point Tower—do you see that?
  (Sir Digby Jones): Yes.

  4430. That is a feature of the interim access arrangements which continues throughout each of the most intensive phases of work. Yes? We can see that that provides highway access to the eastern side of Centre Point Tower at a point, broadly, where the left-turn filter arrow is shown on this plan. Do you see that?
  (Sir Digby Jones): I see it.

  4431. Is it right, from what you have said earlier and what was said in opening, that your preference would be to maintain the vehicular access to that point—that is to say, to the eastern side of Centre Point Tower—throughout the course of the works and permanently?
  (Sir Digby Jones): Rather than what?

  4432. That is your preferred solution to the temporary and the permanent situation after the Crossrail and London Underground works have been concluded.
  (Sir Digby Jones): Rather than?

  4433. I am sorry. Is that your preferred solution?
  (Sir Digby Jones): It is a solution but it is not one that I am sitting here and saying: "Yes, I would really like that, please." What I am saying is: "Are you offering me a suite of solutions here or are you just saying `That is the one. Do you like it?'"

  4434. Do you have a solution which, on advice or having examined the matter, you would regard as a better solution?
  (Sir Digby Jones): Have you ever been there?

  4435. Could you just answer, please?
  (Sir Digby Jones): I am about to give you an answer. Have you ever been there?

  4436. Chairman: Mr Jones, counsel is asking the questions.
  (Sir Digby Jones): Because under there you have got a bus terminus, you have got a taxi rank, you have a place where, when it gets dark, is not a particularly salubrious place to be. It is certainly not a place where I would have young women who work for me going round there late at night on their own when they finish work. It is not an ideal place for a set-down or pick-up. If you are saying it is the only place I can do this, of course I will say to you then I have to tolerate it; what I am saying is it is not preferred, as your question was: "Is it preferred?" The answer is I do not prefer it because I do not want to be here, but if that is the only one in town then I am going to have to accept it.

  4437. Mr Mould: Let us be clear. We have agreed that Crossrail is a good thing and Crossrail should happen.
  (Sir Digby Jones): Yes.

  4438. If Crossrail is going to happen we have agreed that there has to be during the construction phase a worksite which will effectively remove the CBI's existing drop-off point to the west of Centre Point Tower.
  (Sir Digby Jones): Yes.

  4439. So an alternative location has to be found.
  (Sir Digby Jones) Yes.


11   Crossrail Ref: P57, Layout plan-C5 (ix) Tottenham Court Road East-Traffic Management Stage C Outline (CAMDLB-6703-004). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007