Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 4920 - 4939)

  4920. Effectively, the only issue which the Committee is now going to be asked to deal with is the best means of dealing with the film theatres in the basement, as the other matters are now agreed. It is a very narrow point for the Committee this morning.

  4921. Mr Binley: Mr Cameron, would you like to make the case for British Board of Film Classification, assuming on this very narrow point?

  4922. Mr Cameron: Yes, sir. The point has been narrowed. It is not quite as narrow as Mr Elvin suggests, in one respect only. Could I explain what the concerns are and then I will tell you precisely what it is we seek you to resolve.

  4923. Sir, you and other members of the Committee will know that the British Board of Film Classification has a role in classifying films, videos and DVDs. It is an independent, non-government body and it is funded by the fees paid by filmmakers and distributors for classification. These are statutory functions.

  4924. The way that the system works, in brief, is that, under the Licensing Act 2003, premises are licensed for the exhibition of films, and there is a mandatory condition that is imposed requiring the omission of children to the exhibition of any film to be restricted. That is in part why a film distributor has to get the film classified. The classification takes place in accordance with the recommendations by the film classification body, the BBFC. There are similar provisions for video works—and the video works now include DVDs as well as videos. The president and vice-president of the BBFC are designated as the people responsible for classifying video works.

  4925. All the works are subject to full and thorough examination. They have to be viewed in full; video games have to be played at length. It sounds an interesting job, and no doubt it is, but probably when you have played a video game time after time it is not quite as interesting when you started!

  4926. Sir, you will be familiar with the guidelines and in the bundle of exhibits you have Mr Johnson's exhibits.

  4927. Mr Binley: The number for that is A58.[4]


  4928. Mr Cameron: Thank you. In that bundle are the familiar classifications, at page 12 is U, and then PG, 12A, 15 and 18—but you are familiar with those and are 18.[5] Examiners have to examine the content of each work with great care and they have to take account of sound, vision and context. This is an important point to the issue in dispute: the films and videos which are examined have to be watched and listened to in conditions which reflect the conditions in which they will be viewed by the public, because you then get an idea of context. Films, as distinct from video works, are viewed in a dedicated film review theatre, and that cinema screen and auditorium is large enough to allow examiners to make an informed judgment on the impact the film might have on viewers. That is an important point, which goes to the heart of the matters now in dispute.


  4929. Mr Pugh: Could I point out that Mr Cameron is listing things, which we have all seen for ourselves. We have visited the site premises and understand what we are dealing with.

  4930. Mr Binley: I am sure Mr Cameron will take note of that.

  4931. Mr Cameron: Yes: Get a move on. Certainly.

  4932. I appreciate that you have taken the trouble to go and see the premises, and we are very grateful for that, but the point I am trying to make at the moment is that when examining these films it is very important to have conditions, which are similar to those when these films will be viewed.

  4933. Could I also make the point—and I do not know whether you will have observed this when you went to visit the premises—that when one is watching a 35 mm film, if one is interrupted, it is very difficult to rewind. You cannot rewind a 35 mm film.

  4934. Mr Pugh: We do know that, yes.

  4935. Mr Cameron: Good. Thank you very much, sir.

  4936. When you have had a chance to look at the documents you have been given, you will notice that one of the important factors is the language used. The language used can effect classification. BBFC carried out an opinion survey, which is included in the bundle that you have been given. That indicates that, amongst the factors that the public consider to be important or quite important, is the use of swearing and strong language. As a result, it is very important for those classifying films to be able to listen to the film carefully, hear the words, and not only to hear the words precisely but to be able to hear them in context. One misplaced word can result in a film getting the wrong classification.

  4937. Sir, the only other issues I would like to emphasis about the work of BBFC at this stage are these. The films and videos are often submitted to the BBFC at short notice; they may even be accompanied by security guards from the film distributor because they are worried about piracy. The reason that is important is because a distributor can and often does insist that the film is viewed on the BBFC premises and not taken somewhere else. Piracy is a significant issue. These activities are sensitive to noise, vibration and dust, and classification is particularly sensitive to noise.

  4938. Sir, so far as the premises are concerned, you have seen them so I am not going to describe them. I would only like to say that it is important that BBFC's work is carried out on a single site for reasons of security, teamwork and to avoid piracy.

  4939. The advent of the DVD format has led to a substantial increase in work. Just as an example, in 1997 the total annual submission of video works was 5,259, which has gone up to 16,965 in 2005. It is not yet clear whether the trend will continue. The reason I am telling you about this is because of a point that the Promoter may take. Another factor is that the BBFC have a large archive of videos, and, because the video format is going out of use, they have to consider whether to digitise their library. As a result of increased workload and a potential project for digitising the video library, BBFC have been looking at its accommodation requirements. I say that quite openly. However, no decision to move has been made. It is most important that they retain their position with the film-making business cluster in Soho, because that is where their customers—which is probably the wrong word—or those submitting films for classification are.


4   Committee Ref: A58, British Board of Film Classification Exhibits. Back

5   Committee Ref: A58, British Board of Film Classification Guidelines (WESTCC-14805-001, 008-012). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007