Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 5960 - 5979)

  5960. Give us an overview, as it was—15, 16, 17 minutes by fast train along to the tube compared to these.
  (Mr Boyton) That is the choice for anybody at Shenfield in terms of taking the journey into Central London or beyond. You get on a fast train which at the very quickest gets them into Stratford in 11 minutes and then they have a choice of changing on to either a Crossrail train, the existing Central Line or indeed some of the other services provided at Stratford. They may choose to go on to the Crossrail line at Stratford if they are going to a destination that is served by Crossrail, but there are many other destinations clearly existing on the Underground system that will not be accessed either directly by Crossrail or can only be accessed by Crossrail by one other change on to another Underground line.

  The witness withdrew

  5961. Mr Stoker: Sir, that is my first witness in-chief and cross-examined. I will call my next witness, Mr Brimley.

  Mr Christopher George Brimley, Sworn

  Examined by Mr Stoker

  5962. Mr Stoker: Is your name Christopher George Brimley?
  (Mr Brimley) That is correct.

  5963. You have a Master of Arts in engineering from the University of Cambridge, you are a chartered engineer, a Member of the Institution of Civil Engineers since July 1977 and you hold the post of Head of Transportation and parking at Brentwood Borough Council. You have worked there since 1986, is that correct?
  (Mr Brimley) That is correct.

  5964. Can we go to the issue of the impact of the postulated worksites? First of all, the impact is described as serious and we will come to look at mitigation in a moment. Do you agree with that analysis in the impact assessment, that it is serious?
  (Mr Brimley) Yes, I do, in terms of the impact on parking, both long and short term.

  5965. If we can first of all look at Friars Avenue, could you give an overview of the Shenfield shopping centre as you see it? If you could first of all encapsulate it in words and then go on and look at parking issues and quickly go through your photographs.
  (Mr Brimley) As we have heard, the Shenfield shopping parade is a vibrant district shopping centre. In fact I have taken a few photographs recently which gives an impression of what it looks like and the extent to which it is used by shoppers and so on. It has day-to-day and some bulk convenience shopping for the surrounding established residential areas, but it also has some independent shops. There are no less than three independent butchers, a fishmonger, baker and greengrocer, and it has speciality outlets such as high quality fashion, fine art and interior design function. It also functions as a local service centre with banks, building societies, travel agents, hairdressers, doctors and dentists and a library. There are also restaurants, takeaways and a wine bar. At the moment I believe there are few, if any, unoccupied units.

  5966. We have heard that the car parks are 100 metres or less in terms of walking distance from the core shopping area.
  (Mr Brimley) Yes, that is the case. For short-term parking the council is trying to provide that very close to the shops where possible as the main facility for convenience shopping. The traders themselves stress this convenience as being a strong factor in the economic success of the centre.

  5967. We will get specifically on to it at a moment and look at the amount of spaces that will possibly be taken away, but could you encapsulate the impact of taking these spaces away over a period of up to 18 months? How do you judge the consequences for the centre?
  (Mr Brimley) The council is concerned at the loss for no less than 12 months of these car parking spaces or possibly even permanently. It is going to lose 50 spaces for this period, which the Promoters themselves refer to as a significant loss, and that, they say, is 44 per cent of the council's off-street car parking which represents a figure of around 28 per cent of Shenfield's short-term parking provision. The loss of those 50 spaces would in my view be likely to reduce significantly the level of trade and cause significant problems to local businesses. I think that many customers would go elsewhere to shop and would not return again at the end of the 12-month period.

  5968. Where would they go?
  (Mr Brimley) They would probably go to other areas—Billericay, Brentwood and Chelmsford have been suggested as areas that many shoppers would prefer to go to if they had to because they could not find somewhere to park conveniently, and there would be a tendency for them to do that. Billericay, particularly, is a larger town and is quite close by and has some convenience shopping and would be one that many shoppers would tend to go to.

  5969. Within the context of the impact on car parking provisions, how sensitive an issue is this in respect of the activities of the borough council and local community?
  (Mr Brimley) I can hardly overstate how sensitive this issue is at the moment. Long-term and short-term spaces in the Shenfield shopping area are both in high demand and over recent years this has been proved time and time again. In fact I think Mr Cork yesterday advised the Committee that the council had actually changed hands on the basis of the issue of car parking in Shenfield, and he is absolutely right; that is what happened fairly recently. The borough council is currently conducting a review of these issues. We have had stakeholder meetings taking place as part of this to gain an understanding of the competing views of local traders, employees and residents. We undertook an opinion survey and the council's policy board on 15 March of this year covering this showed that the public response had demonstrated the great importance of short and long-term parking for local businesses in Shenfield. Local traders at the time of the opinion survey showed great concern over the issues and there is, in fact, a high level of use of the existing limited waiting restrictions in the area which I think illustrates that there is a great demand for parking.

  5970. Can you take up your photographs and take us through them briefly to give us a flavour. As I understand it, you walked around the centre taking photographs in sequence to demonstrate your points.
  (Mr Brimley) That is right. The first page we have here shows the Hunter Avenue car park, and it is normally full up.[29] Hunter Avenue council car park is the most popular because it is quite a bit more convenient than Friars Avenue car park for pedestrians, so both short term and the season ticket holders probably tend to migrate towards this car park. If we go on to the next one that is a further shot of that car park.


  5971. Page 2.
  (Mr Brimley) We are now walking along the north side from Hunter Avenue car park from the station on the left in photograph A, walking towards the west and you will get an impression here of the level of on-street parking taking place and also see some of the service outlets and shops in the area.

  5972. There were surveys done by the Promoters that indicated in terms of the on-street provision such as this that there was 100 per cent take-up, people actually queuing to get into these spaces. Is that your experience?
  (Mr Brimley) Yes, there is very regular, high use of those spaces. I took this photo at about 2.30 p.m. last Friday, but it is typical of most of the working day because the spaces are very highly used.

  5973. Page 3?
  (Mr Brimley) We are still walking to the west on the north side of Hutton Road. The road you can see in front of you in D is Crossways and going across there is a butcher on the right and a flower shop.

  5974. The fourth page?
  (Mr Brimley) Now we are getting to the area where there is slightly more residential property, particularly on the left, but we are still carrying on walking to the west. You will notice that in photograph B you see some white advisory access-clear markings, which were put in in the bays there to keep access to the properties clear. But even so you will see that people use up all the space available.

  5975. Page 5.
  (Mr Brimley) Now we are getting towards the mini roundabout at the end which you can see in front of you in B. Again, very high use of the on-street spaces.

  5976. Shall we just move on and take as read the sixth page (unless there are any other comments) the seventh page and then we go to the eighth page.
  (Mr Brimley) This is the Friars Avenue car park, which, as I say, is less full generally than the Hunter Avenue car park, though I would anticipate, with the recent growth in occupancy in these car parks over recent years, by the time Crossrail comes along I guess this will be full up as well.

  5977. Then I am going to offer to take as read 9, 10 and 11, unless there are any particular points on that. Can you just check?
  (Mr Brimley) Yes, there is not really anything on that.

  5978. So then if we can focus in on Friars Avenue, can you tell us about the strategy there and the split between the short-term pay-and-display and season ticket holders, and give an indication of how that strategy was formed and what it is meant to be doing?
  (Mr Brimley) Yes. The council introduced season tickets into the Friars Avenue and Hunter Avenue car parks between five and 10 years ago, I think, to accommodate strong demands from local retailers that they did not have anywhere to park. We limited the numbers of spaces. In fact, it was increased a few years ago and is now at 85, maximum, spread between the two car parks. In fact, we are considering a proposal to actually allocate a certain number to each car park to make the two a bit more evenly used because of the sorts of issues that the process demonstrated. Eighty-two of those season tickets have been taken up at the moment. The idea was to provide an off-street facility for those who really need long-term spaces who were local employees, mainly, and that really constitutes the total availability, apart from this certain issue at the moment with some pay-and-display machines on the street which can, actually, park long-term, but that is actually going to be changed. However, at the moment, 85 is about the total number of long-term spaces there are available in the Shenfield area to cover the whole of the shopping centre and the associated offices, and so on, in the area. We do not permit rail commuters to use them; you have to actually have an address of an employer in Shenfield to qualify for one of the season tickets, and the car parks are run—and it says so in the off-street parking places order—as either season ticket or short-term, two-hour limited waiting. What actually happens is that season ticket holders tend to get there first, so they are normally able to take up their spaces, and then the short-term users later on during the day fill up as they need to make use of any spaces that may be available.

  5979. I wonder if we could put up our parking policies, T8 and thereafter.[30] This is the third appendices. While we get that on the screen, you have got your policies in front of you. Can you explain to the Committee how you judge that the provision of both pay-and-display season tickets (that mix) is compatible with the policies in this statutory plan?

  (Mr Brimley) Firstly, the policies T8, T9, T10 and T11 were developed in close co-operation between myself and Mr Boyton, who was preparing the draft policies for the Local Plan a few years ago, and there was much discussion at the time of how they inter-related with the council's needs and the views of the public with regard to Shenfield. You have got to recognise, of course, that in the Local Plan, that is the land use planning document, and Mr Boyton will, of course, be very interested in having regard to government policies in terms of planning guidance, PPG13. We have other, in terms of parking authorities, guidance but that is one of the main issues there. What we are trying to do here, in T8, is to promote the use of short-term car parking but, also, to critically assess long-term car parking. That is what we did and the council arrived at this figure of 85 as being the level it wanted to provide, following a great deal of consultation with local businesses and a balance of long-term and short-term parking in the area, so as to promote overall the best operation economically of the whole of the Shenfield centre area. Then, in T9, we are talking about off-street public car parking provision. Again, we believe it is entirely in keeping with the strategy adopted in Shenfield. T10 goes on to talk about on-street parking. Now that, of course, is a matter which also is a concern to the council as local planning authority, but it is of course fundamentally a highways authority matter. The council has agency from the county council with regard to on-street parking matters but no other transport matters. T11 talks about commuter car parking and explains how we are very concerned about the loss of commuter car parking in a number of areas including Shenfield.


29   Committee Ref: A66, Brentwood Borough Council, Parking Issues-photographs (SCN20060329-007 to 012). Back

30   Committee Ref: A66, Brentwood Borough Council planning policies regarding parking T8, T9, T10 and T11 (BRWDBO-14905-067 and 068). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007