Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 6380 - 6399)

  6380. Undertakings have been offered by the Promoter relating to the mitigation of all of those matters because it has been accepted that Mintel are a special case because of the particular proximity of their building to the work site and the substandard nature of the existing attenuation by the single glazing on the property.

  6381. The mechanism that has been offered, if I may summarise it briefly just to paint the picture, is that the Promoter has offered an undertaking to carry out the works in the Lindsey Street work site in a manner that will mitigate the omission of noise and vibration as far as reasonably practicable. It has offered a noise and vibration mitigation package that will be based upon noise limits that will be identified at a point in the future, taking into account a number of factors, including the particular usage of the site at that particular time and the more detailed information that would be available at that stage in relation to the design of the project.

  6382. The basic purpose of the undertakings is to identify a mitigation package which would then be introduced to ensure that the noise and vibration from the construction would not significantly affect business operation of the premises and it is really the extent to which, as I understand, that that mitigation package addresses their concerns is the matter at issue before the Committee today. I think if that is sufficient I will sit down and hand you over to my learned friend.

  6383. Mr Newberry: Sir, one of the key factors in this matter you have got to look at is proximity. The building owned or occupied by Mintel is five metres from the works that you have just heard about and, without being too precise about it, I suspect five metres is about where the stenographer is, so that gives you an idea of how close the works are and the period of time which those works will take place is of the order of four and a half years, so you are concentrating on what we regard as a sensitive office user being at that level of proximity for that amount of time and we regard that as a serious state of affairs.

  6384. The company, you will hear from the company shortly, is a world leader, it is not just a market research company, it is a world leader in its field, but that work requires a quiet environment as the name "research" implies. The work they do involves detailed analysis and is highly demanding to meet their clients which are of an international variety. Sir, the work that goes on in what is just described broadly as offices is not only work of a highly demanding nature, but it is also carried on from time to time in various languages, because the clients are international, the staff are bilingual, many of them, and therefore there are contractual negotiations concerned the content of report all carried on in this building at one and the same time, so I will be asking you to find in due course that we do have a noise sensitive, vibration sensitive user in this building which is not to be brushed aside by simply saying it is an office user; it is an office user, but it is a very sensitive one.

  6385. The work contemplated, you probably heard before, it obviously involves the demolition of the building opposite, Hayne Street, as well as extensive construction involving banks of escalators and then subsequently a three to five storey building, so a long construction period and also doubling up, as I understand it, as work site.

  6386. Sir, so far as noise is concerned, the outside noise level, I understand it, the figures are between 80 and 85 LAeQ and that is noisy. The internal level currently is of the order of 60/63 and when we have that external noise level Mr Griffiths will be telling you in due course that the noise climate within the building is unacceptable, unless there is some form of double glazing we have doubts as to whether or not, if there were glazing, it could actually bring it down below the relevant standard.

  6387. So far as vibration is concerned, the figures you will be hearing are 1.5-7 millimetres per second and those are the Crossrail's own figures. Mr Griffiths will tell you in due course that he has actually been in a building where work was going on relatively nearby which achieved three, that is under half what is contemplated here, and he will tell you that that is frightening and that the building work was ordered to be stopped, so on Crossrail's own figures they are contemplating levels which are over twice what my witness will tell you was a very disturbing and frightening level and it is accepted, as I understand it in Crossrail's specialist report, that the threshold of significance for screening purposes may be exceeded at the building on Hayne Street, so they are accepting they are going to exceed it.

  6388. We do not feel that what Mr Taylor has indicated to you as a package actually meets the problem. We are sufficiently open-minded to be persuaded, but our current position is that we do not think that a packet that is being offered will get below a level which is acceptable both in terms of the building and those that work within it.

  6389. In addition you heard about Hayne Street and I have indicated that is five metres wide and you have just heard that it is going to be closed from one end. You will see, in due course, that on Hayne Street is where deliveries take place to Mintel. There are a considerable number of packages that come into Mintel on a daily basis and we have concern over two areas. First of all, if there is going to be work carried on of demolition et cetera, we cannot see how Hayne Street is going to be kept open or, if it is, how we are going to get our delivery traffic down it. Secondly, Hayne Street provides the emergency exit point from the basement of the building and we are concerned that the level of activity contemplated on the site opposite that there may well be difficulties getting out of the building, particularly for those that may be mobility impaired.

  6390. It is on that basis that we say that four and a half years of constant activity involving high levels of both noise and vibration, we do not feel that a noise sensitive user should be exposed to that for that period and we think that the best way forward is to re-locate us at an early stage.

  6391. Can I just correct Mr Taylor? We wish we were the freeholders, but we are not, we have a leasehold interest which may, in the context of re-location of course, represent less of a bill but, having said that, we do recognise that the request for re-location does involve public expense and we take that into account in considering whether or not we should be asking for it and we feel, in the circumstances, the impact on a world-class business is sufficiently adverse to ask you to recommend that.

  6392. Mr Newberry: Against that background can I call Mr Jason Thomson who is the company representative?

  Mr Jason Thomson, sworn

  Examined by Mr Newberry

  6393. Just before we start going through your presentation, Mr Thomson, can you tell the Committee who you are and what position you hold within the company?
  (Mr Thomson) My name is Jason Thomson and I am Director of IT at Mintel. I graduated from Newcastle University with a Master of Engineers degree in Microelectronics and Software Engineering. I then went on to work for British Telecom and from there I went on to work for Reuters, and in 1997 I joined Mintel as Director of IT. I have been a member of the executive team since that time. When I joined there were 70 people in the offices in Long Lane. There are now considerably more. In my position as IT Director I have overseen from an IT perspective four expansions overseas in America and several expansions in our office in Long Lane.

  6394. Just looking at your presentation, can you take us through these points?

  6395. Chairman: For the record, this is A74.[25]


  6396. Mr Newberry: Just take the Committee through these points. First of all, tell the Committee who Mintel are.
  (Mr Thomson) Mintel International are a global provider of market research. We cover 98 per cent of consumer markets. A consumer market is an industry where the businesses are selling to consumers, so things like toothpaste, shoes, cars, credit cards, bank accounts, insurance. In any business transaction between a business and a consumer we cover 98 per cent of those industries. We have global coverage in some of the products and services that we provide. We have offices in London, Chicago, Sydney and Shanghai. The Shanghai office is a relatively new office. We opened that earlier this year. There are only two people there at the moment but we are anticipating significant growth there. We have over 400 directly employed staff at Mintel. In addition to that we have a network of field associates around the world whom we sub-contract to do surveys for us, to do audits, to pick up products from supermarkets and so on. We also have a team of freelance experts, freelance writers, that we use to help us with our report writing. We have repeatedly been voted a business superbrand by peers within the business community, and if I can just read you the criteria for being voted a business superbrand, "A business superbrand has established the finest reputation in its field. It offers customers significant emotional and/or tangible advantages over its competitors which consciously or subconsciously customers want, recognise and are confident about investing in". We consider that we offer tangible benefits rather than just emotional benefits. We are the first market research company to be awarded this. To give you an idea of the other people who have been given these awards, they are people like IBM, KPMG, Microsoft—Microsoft are on the opposite page to us. We have a daily presence in the press. Yesterday there was an article on the BBC website talking about exploitation of immigrants in domestic help, and they used some of our research to back up that report. They took some information from our British Lifestyles Report 2005, and that report told them that one in 10 households in the UK have some form of domestic help, whether it is gardeners, cleaners, things like that, and that the market is worth three billion pounds. Another article that you may have seen recently, which has been extensively covered in the press, is about the Impact of Terrorism and Natural Disasters Report that we put out a couple of weeks ago, and the thing that people were picking up there was that two-thirds of Britons, two-thirds of consumers in the UK, are not deterred by terrorism from travelling abroad. That is the kind of information that we provide. We were given an award by the British and American Business Council for our work in Chicago and they gave us an award in 2004 for "our enviable customer focus and innovation" and our ability to provide a unique overview of a market's dynamics and prospects. We were numbered six in last year's Marketing magazine's league table of research companies in the UK and we are still experiencing significant growth, so we are a very successful company.

  6397. Just on that point about significant growth and its relevance to the impact of Crossrail, what is your average level of expansion in terms of staff?
  (Mr Thomson) It depends on which location. In the US we are expanding more quickly than we are in the UK because it is a bigger market and our focus for making money is in the US. In the UK it is currently running at approximately five to 10 per cent a year.

  6398. You have 400 directly employed staff?
  (Mr Thomson) Yes. There are 200 employed in the UK.

  6399. So you are looking at adding between 20 and 30 jobs a year?
  (Mr Thomson) Worldwide, yes.


25   Committee Ref: A74, Mintel Presentation. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007