Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 6860 - 6863)

  6860. Members, I have to put it to you that really what you are being faced with today is a stark reality: of a scheme that has not been adequately considered. There are questions as to the legality of the Environmental Statement. I simply raise this because they are capable of cure. As Mr Elvin pointed out on Day One, there have already been two supplementary addenda to the Environmental Statement and all my clients seek today is for you to suggest to the Promoters, in somewhat more forceful terms than we can, that they look at these alternatives properly before this Bill is allowed to proceed further—certainly before it comes to the third reading, if necessary (in response to Mr Binley's point).

  6861. The reason why we raise the question of compensation is it is not just how the system is going to operate, it is its impact upon those residents and businesses which are going to be affected day-on-day for the future life of this railway. If the compensation bill can be less, as Mr Winbourne has indicated, simply by appropriate measures being taken, why not take them? Why not study them now? Why leave this all till later to find there are disadvantaged people not having sufficient money even though the compensation code is being applied which may be one that is nationally based but, nonetheless, is one which has been recognised by the Law Commission as being in such need of reform that it has produced two volumes of very detailed work which will await Parliamentary time for consideration in terms of the substantive Bill.

  6862. Members, that is the position in which my clients wish to place this matter in this context at this time. We ask you to recommend to the Promoters that there be further consideration of the alternatives so that Parliament as well as the nation have the reassurance that what finally gets passed as an Act of Parliament, if it ever does, is not only in the national interest but is the best value to this country, not only in terms of utilisation of taxpayers' money but, also, in terms of having the least environmental effects. Thank you very much.

  6863. Chairman: Thank you very much indeed. Tomorrow morning, at 10.00 am in this room, we will recommence firstly to hear the Petitions of the Regent Street Association, followed then by the London Borough of Havering and we will then return, at 2.30 tomorrow afternoon, to hear the case put by Antique Hypermarket Limited and then return, if necessary, to the London Borough of Havering case.






 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007