Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 7912 - 7919)

  7912. Chairman: Today we will continue hearing the Petition of the London Borough of Greenwich, but, before we start, can I just remind people who work here regularly and those members of the public who are visiting that this morning the Committee will adjourn at 11.45 so that members can leave the Committee and go down to Prime Minister's Question Time. Mr Jones?

  Mr Robert Ian Chard, Recalled

  Examination by Mr Jones, continued

  7913. Mr Jones: We had reached section 3 in Mr Chard's proof. Mr Chard, could you turn to your section 3 please and could you read, starting at paragraph 3.1 please.
  (Mr Chard) The scale and speed of possible regeneration around any Crossrail station will be greatly influenced by the accessibility changes which that station will deliver. Accessibility can be defined as the ability of residents and businesses using the station to get to jobs, customers, services or other destinations within an acceptable journey time. Access to jobs by commuters is probably the most important aspect of accessibility, but the ability of local businesses and retailers to access customers is also significant. In this evidence, I only consider accessibility by public transport. Changes to accessibility occur when it becomes possible to reach more jobs or more people within the same travel time, or to reach the same numbers more quickly or cheaply. Usually, all such changes occur when a new station is introduced in a new location. Usually also, the consequential effect is a boost to the local economy. The size of any accessibility change related to a new station can vary considerably and so can the impact of a new station as a consequence. Therefore, when a potential new station is being considered, it is important to measure, and to understand, the size of accessibility change because, in that way, the potential economic and regeneration impacts of the station can be better appreciated. Because accessibility change is multi-dimensional, it is usually measured using computer modelling. For this evidence, the Council appointed Capita Symonds to undertake accessibility change modelling using their ACCESSION model. It was also decided to use definitions and measures of accessibility which are compatible with accessibility modelling undertaken by the Greater London Authority and the Promoters so that comparisons can be made. The key measures used were access to jobs within a 30-minute travel time from a station and access to resident population within a 45-minute travel time, and in both cases by all or any public transport. Comparisons were made between the current 2006 accessibility and modelled 2016 accessibility, which include assumptions about the availability of various new transport projects in London, including Crossrail.

  7914. I wonder if Mr Chard's slide 3 could now be put up please.[1]

  (Mr Chard) Initially two situations were considered: Crossrail with Abbey Wood station, but not Woolwich station; and Crossrail with both Abbey Wood and Woolwich stations.

  7915. That is your figure 3 and you can see that it says, "Woolwich without a Crossrail station", and I wonder if you could just talk us through that figure please.
  (Mr Chard) Yes, you can see the Woolwich station with the symbol and this shows the journey times that the model calculates for 2016 when various new infrastructure and services will be in place in London. It shows that you cannot reach central London in 15 minutes and it shows also that you cannot reach all of London even travelling for 60 minutes, which is the blue colour, so the areas are related to the population numbers and the job numbers which you can reach within various time bands. This is a two-dimensional measure of accessibility, whereas yesterday the accessibility was quoted in linear terms along the Crossrail route.

  7916. So obviously this includes a lot of places which are not on the Crossrail route and indeed places which do not even have a station?
  (Mr Chard) Yes, it takes account of the other rail services and bus services which are assumed to be available in 2016 and would allow you to make the journeys within these times shown.

  7917. Of course one can see within it small dots which are slightly larger pink within the red and small dots and slightly larger red within the green and so on. Are those stations?
  (Mr Chard) Yes.

  7918. Can we now move to the next slide please, slide 4, which is, I think, Woolwich with a Crossrail station and obviously what matters is the difference?[2] Can you just deal with that please, Mr Chard?

  (Mr Chard) This shows that all the areas in pink increase because Crossrail can take you faster to many destinations and Crossrail, in combination with other public transport through the Crossrail interchanges, can take passengers to a very much larger area of London within various time bands. In particular, you will see that the red, which is less than 30 minutes, now covers the centre of London, the central area of the City and parts of the West End which it did not previously, and it does not just cover the Crossrail stations, but it covers the area you see there in red. We have also got tables which tell us the number of people and the number of jobs which are currently within these areas which have different colours.

  7919. You mentioned a difference to the City and the West End, but what about the difference made to the Isle of Dogs?
  (Mr Chard) You can also see that that changes to less than 15 minutes and that is particularly important, I think, for the regeneration of Woolwich.


1   Committee Ref: A84, Woolwich without Crossrail Station 2016 Journey Times (GRCHLB-3605-327). Back

2   Committee Ref: A84, Woolwich with Crossrail Station 2016 Journey Times (GRCHLB-3605-328). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007