Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 9060 - 9079)

  9060. I would like to move on to lorry movements and we know that the bulk of the lorry movements will go along Durward Street from east to west. Lorries with supplies will leave Sainsbury's car park, then will then turn right into Brady Street and then left into Durward Street, that is two turns within a very short distance. It will be very noisy outside flats at the turn in Brady Street which is a narrow street. Those outside staircase 11, the entrances are internal but the bedrooms are on the outside.

  9061. I am not clear whether the lorries at Essex Wharf will return via the school and right into Durward Street or whether they will go through the back of the school and down into Durward Street, I am not sure whether that has been totally decided.

  9062. There is a great danger of turning right and turning into Durward Street, turning left. It is a very narrow pavement there. The beginning of the staircases are only 46 from the road so we will need some traffic management there of build-outs to make sure that lorries do not turn too tightly.

  9063. I just feel leaving the end of Durward Street on the west side has not really been mentioned in any way. I think the houses that are down that end, as lorries turn left into Vallance Road might also have quite a lot of problems if over 70 lorries a day drive down to that corner and have to wait for traffic to move into Vallance Road. That could be a very noisy scenario. I know that Crossrail said that in fact it will not be any worse than buses but those of you who have been there will see the buses at the moment turn down Fulbourne Street, they come in Vallance Road but they do not exit from Vallance Road. I think lorries could be a far noisier vehicle than buses.

  9064. There will be the kitchen deliveries from the school coming in and out, perhaps that is not many but it is just added noise in Durward Street.

  9065. Many of the lorry movements which stop on the west side and the Durward Street worksite would be dropping off and picking up lorries because all the demolished buildings and everything have to go out. I would expect that there would be a lot of noise while that is done.

  9066. Now there are varying extrapolations as to the amount of noise and it is quite difficult to trawl through everything with the additional provisions but I understand that at the peak time it would be 80 lorries per day going along Durward Street and there could be 140 lorry movements in Sainsbury's. Some of those would be turn round lorries going back out of the Sainsbury's site and some of those would be out of hours. All these lorry movements will require management of staff to ensure that there are safe pedestrian movements and access for residents of Kempton Court and the West Durward Street site and Trinity Hall. We expect that all this traffic will produce dirt, dust and a degradation of the landscape and, therefore, we would ask for regular checking and, if necessary, wall washing and window washing of buildings in Durward Street to keep them reasonably cared for during this long period of work. There are some trees in Durward Street. They struggle greatly to grow but it would be nice if they were protected.

  9067. The other really important thing about Durward Street is it is the only street which runs between Vallance Road and Brady Street for a long period because of the East London Line cut-through. We know the minute the bollards are removed in Durward Street it will become a rat-run and it will be a place for boy racers. We are very concerned about this. If it is not being used for deliveries at night you need to look at a way of having it closed off so that we do not get the nightly rat-runs, and hopefully monitored during the daytime so people do not use it as a cut-through. The reason it would be so popular is if you go down Brady Street to Whitechapel Road you can only turn left, you cannot turn right, so it would make it very attractive to nip through Durward Street instead.

  9068. On the question of noise, this is certainly our biggest concern. It is just the all-round effect of noise all the time. There will always be some noise going on. When one looks at the machines, ground-breaking machines, particularly when the shafts are first being dug and the utilities, there will be piling, cranes, tracked excavators, front-end loaders, compressors, generators, excavation going on, large concrete pours, the tunnel ventilation in Sainsbury's car park, the demolition and rebuilding, and spoil unloading and loading on lorries, and these are all things that will create a noise. It is not predictable, as with so many sites, where that noise will move to and create problems for people in Durward Street.

  9069. I will look at a couple of examples of unexpected noise which have made me realise this. At the corner of Brady Street and Whitechapel Road there is the new Idea store built by Tower Hamlets. It was opened in September last year and we suddenly heard an enormous noise around Kempton Court and it was very variable at which point it was heard. It sounded like birds fighting, I suppose. It was very loud and very perturbing. Eventually I spent some time tracking it down to the Idea store and I went into the Idea store where you could not hear it at all. I asked to see the manager who was really surprised that we had this terrific noise. It was a new bird scarer. It certainly scared the daylights out of us! Now it has been modified and turned down and it is okay. That is just an example of noise that travels in strange and unexpected directions. At the moment there is another worksite going on, which will be a long, ongoing process, and that is the demolition and rebuilding of the Royal London Hospital. From my flat I can hear very clearly the sound of drilling and demolition and yet I live four streets from where it has just started but it is so clear and it has to pass through the wall of a great post office as well. It is very obvious to me when they are doing jack work or whatever. That is another example. I would not have supposed that noise could come so far so clearly. That is what makes me realise how difficult it might be to look at the amount of noise that will affect all the residents of Durward Street.

  9070. The mitigation is that at the moment certain dwellings have been designated as needing noise insulation but the whole of Durward Street should be treated the same. Everybody will need noise insulation. It is very difficult to say where that will be at any one time. Most of us, because we are in modern buildings, do have double glazing so noise insulation might be difficult to install because I understand if you are going to put another lot of insulation in it needs mechanical ventilation otherwise how will you get any air. It might be reasonable to provide compensation for residents so that they might be able to get out of the area occasionally instead, they might think, "We have to put up with the noise, however hideous, but we would like to be able to go down to Brighton for the day" as a sort of quid pro quo.

  9071. We would like to be considered as a special area in terms of noise where everyone is equally affected. There are also some people who are designated as requiring temporary re-housing. This has caused a problem because we do not have any certainty as to who these people are in the same way that we do not have any certainty about who the people are at the moment who have been designated as needing noise insulation. This comes about partly because of the way the numbering has been written. On the list of properties likely to qualify for noise insulation only, it has various properties but it is not specific enough to know which they are, which leaves a degree of uncertainty. For instance, it states "the property addresses one to four Kempton Court" but what I think they are really saying is staircases one to four but on staircases one to four there are 28 flats and eight of those would qualify but we do not know which eight flats or why those were chosen. It goes on to 6 Winthrop Street, which is Trinity Hall, the school building, and it just says one flat will qualify. Which one of the 18 flats will qualify? This is the area I would ask Crossrail to work on specifically to make sure we do have some definite information. This is particularly important because this is leading up to blight.

  9072. I just want to turn to the Albion Health Centre because they have concerns about noise.[5] This is a big health centre with six doctors and they are planning to expand. It backs on to the Sainsbury's car park site. I do have a letter from them. What they are saying is that it might be a problem if there is noise during consultations when they need a calm atmosphere and yet just over the wall there is an enormous building site. They need Crossrail to look at mitigation measures for that. The GPs are going to take on more procedures, which is the standard thing now that much work should be done in GPs' surgeries rather than hospitals, so that is going to put some pressure on their delivery of that. They already do minor surgery and they need a very clean atmosphere for that, so that may need special insulation provided by Crossrail. They would like close consultations throughout the site works. They do feel that they might need to call for the cessation of work sometimes if they cannot fulfil what they are doing with the patients. That is a very big concern. They are also losing some car parking space permanently but this is essential for doctors who might need to get out quickly. That needs good replacement at a convenient place.


  9073. I want to look at pedestrian movements in Durward Street. The route goes to the school, the leisure centre and Sainsbury's. As I said, for drivers it is the only one that goes through to Vallance Road. It is also the only one that people from Spitalfields can use as a street to come through to those facilities. It is a busy street. I did a few brief pedestrian counts looking out of my window.[6] Between 8.35 and 8.45 in the morning walking along Durward Street there were 170 people, that is 170 people in 10 minutes. They were not all school children because there were also people going to and from work. On Saturday, walking along Brady Street at the corner of Durward Street, in 10 minutes there were 136 people. You might think they were all going to Sainsbury's but they were walking up and down the street and it is very busy. Brady Street has flats further up and access to Bethnal Green overground station. On Wednesday between 8.30 to 8.45 between Durward Street and Whitechapel Road along Brady Street there were 331 people all going along that very narrow road, either to the school, to Sainsbury's or to and from Bethnal Green station. The other one was Durward Street going towards Brady Street on Thursday at 12.45 to 12.55 when there were 64. That was not the peak time, that was not the school children coming out. That was a steady flow of people going to and from that street to businesses or shopping. It is narrow in places and can be hazardous now. I think those who came on the visit today saw the most extraordinary sight of the GCSE pupils coming out and taking up the whole road. That is not only today, the pupils do come out of school—there are over 1,000 pupils—and they are very exuberant. That road is busy but still people choose to belt along it occasionally. Over the East London Line bridge it is very narrow, just two people wide. There is a picture of that.[7] That is of particular concern because on the other side of that facing on to it is Trinity Hall and it has no pavement whatsoever so people must walk along the East London Line bridge. Normally people spill out on to the street because it is not that busy with traffic. If that was being used for lorry movements all day then we would need build-out of that pavement and some means of ensuring safety, but not at the cost of the pedestrians who are already squashed along there.



  9074. I would suggest that it would be helpful to have no lorries in the street at school arrival and departure times to account for the fact that if there are 170 children coming along Durward Street in 10 minutes why not stop lorry movements from 8.30am to 8.50am so that people can get there safely.

  9075. Ms Lieven: Can I just say, Sir, we have agreed that with the school. We will not be using Durward Street for lorries during those hours. That one is an easy tick.

  9076. Chairman: Thank you.

  9077. Ms Singleton: We would like a person to manage lorry movements, for instance from Essex Wharf to Durward Street, so that we can get access to Kempton Court as well.

  9078. The next point I want to raise is purchase of property in case of hardship. This is a very difficult one for us. There was a date of December 2003 at which people were deemed to have known about Crossrail so that effectively means all property which was bought after that, people should know that Crossrail was going to be in the area. Effectively it puts a blight on everybody's property. I appreciate that it is hoped that the Bill will go through and construction will start fairly speedily but nothing is guaranteed. All the time that is happening we will have a blight on the sale of our properties. Kempton Court, originally, the properties were fairly reasonably priced, there are no lifts there. It was first-time buyers and people who wanted to work locally, say in the hospital, who would buy there. People are mobile, if they are first-time buyers they want to move on, they marry, whatever. There is a steady sale of property. Very often it is done internally, people put a notice up on the notice board, they have rented there, they like it, they would like to move in. We do know there are some people who are aware of what might happen and have bought properties but others who are putting their house on the market have had severe difficulties in selling their property.

  9079. I would just like to look at two instances.[8] Melanie Goodfellow bought her flat in 1996, so she was the first owner. In May 2000 she says she found she was pregnant and wanted to sell her house to buy a family property. She spruced up the flat, put it on the market with agents Carrington, who are well known local agents, at a price of £243,000 when a recent property had gone for £240,000. This is about the standard price. She received a first offer very quickly but then, in fact, those people could not get a mortgage. The flat went back on the market and she received a second offer just two weeks later for £237,500 but the buyer pulled out abruptly on 11 August after doing some personal research into the impact Crossrail would have on Kempton Court and the surrounding area. Melanie says that the information did not come up in the local search. The buyer had rung up the local planning office and was told that Durward Street would be one of the worst hit roads in the area. She had read the Environmental Impact on the internet and thought that was pretty grim reading.



5   Committee Ref: A103, Photograph of the Albion Health Centre (TOWNHLB-7005-006). Back

6   Committee Ref: A103, Pedestrian Count, Durward Street area (SCN20060523-001). Back

7   Committee Ref: A103, Photograph of the East London Line Bridge (TOWNHLB-7005-010). Back

8   Committee Ref: A103, Correspondence concerning property selling in Kempton Court (TOWNHLB-7005-014 and -015). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007