Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 10640 - 10657)

  10640. Mr Binley: Which I think I am right in saying is quite early in the process of the correspondence, is it not?

  10641. Mr Galloway: I am not sure he would resile from what he said in that correspondence.

  10642. Mr Binley: I draw attention to the fact that is not necessarily the whole of the correspondence being quoted to us.

  10643. Mr Galloway: It is a fair point that is made, Chairman, but it is equally a fair point that I make. These are the extant views of Trevor Phillips, as far as I am aware.

  10644. Mr Binley: If I just might add, is it not case, if I recall it correctly that was something Mr Phillips wrote after having received two letters from two people in the area and that he has perhaps modified his views since?

  10645. Mr Galloway: You may be more familiar with Mr Trevor Phillips than me.

  10646. Mr Binley: I am.

  10647. Mr Galloway: But my constituent John Aktar knows this scheme inside out and knows the impact it will have inside out. Trevor Phillips did write the words I have just quoted. I am aware of no other words from Trevor Phillips in which he withdraws his observations.

  10648. Chairman: Neither am I, Mr Galloway. Can I just say that we have all the correspondence from the Commission and we will appraise all that information.

  10649. Mr Galloway: Okay. I am coming to my last point, Chairman.

  10650. Chairman: And we will give a judgment.

  10651. Mr Galloway: I am coming to my last point. Mr Elvin, again rather bravely, stated that there was material in Bengali. There are three things wrong with that. First of all, these must have been phantom materials because none of the Bengalis appear to have ever seen it. Secondly, most of my constituents do not speak Bengali, they speak Sylheti. Thirdly, many of my constituents do not read at all. Many of the older Bangladeshi origin people in my constituency do not read at all. They were not communicated with. If you like, I will bring them all here to tell you that they do not feel that Crossrail properly communicated with them during this long period in which they had a right to have their views properly taken into account. I can fill this room and every room in this corridor with Bengalis who will tell you that, Chairman. So I do not withdraw the case I made that Crossrail only very belatedly undertook that which they are required to by law, the race impact studies. Only when they were taxed about their failure to do so by the Commission for Racial Equality and only in the second round were materials in Sylheti produced. If there were any in the first round they were not seen by very many Sylheti speakers in my constituency.

  10652. So I am very grateful to you, Chairman, for the very kind way that you have conducted your management of what I have had to say. I apologise if I have broken any rules. I am grateful for the opportunity to come back on the things that we have agreed that I can come back on. I have nothing more to say.

  10653. Chairman: You only broke a few, George, but that is par for the course: one or two pieces of unparliamentary language like the use of the word "bloody", and the outrageous suggestion that Mr Elvin lived down a leafy lane!

  10654. Mr Elvin: If only!

  10655. Chairman: All in all, are you concluded?

  10656. Mr Galloway: Yes.

  10657. Chairman: Thank you very much for your attendance. We will take account of all the evidence that has been given. We will adhere to the promises that have been given from this chair about correspondence to you and your right to respond to that. We will be in touch in that respect. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's hearing. The meeting of this Committee will be tomorrow at 10 am. Order, order.






 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007