Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 10680 - 10699)

  10680. Chairman: How noisy would they be?

  10681. Mr Elvin: Mr Paris from Crossrail tells me it is difficult to predict the noise at the time, I think one should proceed on basis it will be audible.

  10682. Chairman: Are you planning to call any experts?

  10683. Mr Elvin: No. I accept the tunnel boring machine will be audible for a period of a week or two weeks but there will be no audibility for the operation of the tunnels.

  10684. Chairman: We have had the opportunity in the past to question an expert on how to mitigate sound effects. Can we not have a brief period where we can do the same?

  10685. Mr Elvin: Unfortunately Mr Thornley-Taylor is in Edinburgh today.

  10686. Mr Binley: Tell him to shout!

  10687. Mr Elvin: Mr Paris who deals with some of these matters within Crossrail, however he is not an acoustics expert as Mr Thornely-Taylor is, would be able to give the Committee some information, would that be helpful?

  10688. Chairman: Yes.

  10689. Mr Elvin: I am quite happy for him to answer questions if that helps.

  Mr Robert Paris, sworn

  Examined by Mr Elvin

  10690. Mr Elvin: Mr Paris, can you give your name and explain what your position is?
  (Mr Paris) My name is Robert Paris and I am the Environment Manager for Crossrail.

  10691. Can you explain the position to the Committee with regard to the passage of the tunnel boring machine along the tunnels in the vicinity of Christ Church please, the duration of that passage?
  (Mr Paris) Certainly, the tunnel boring machine will be audible as it travels by, that will be a transient effect probably for a week or two weeks at most.

  10692. Is it possible to mitigate against the noise from the tunnel boring machine itself?
  (Mr Paris) Unfortunately with the tunnel boring machine, no. You can design the railway to mitigate noise impact but you can imagine that tunnel boring machine simply has to cut through the ground.

  10693. Chairman: We have in the past had experts here who talked about floating slabs and all kinds of mitigation, would these be employed in respect of this area once the tunnel has been bored?
  (Mr Paris) The predictions as they are at the moment indicated that we would not need something like a floating slab or an enhanced trap for this location but if during the detailed design it was identified that we could not meet the criteria we have set out in our policy then those measures would be implemented.

  10694. Mr Binley: I recognise your difficulties with regard to programming and where it should be at any given time. I understand that however the time at which the music festivals are on at Spitalfields are relatively limited and there are some big holes in the year. Does that not allow you to have some sort of planning?
  (Mr Paris) I am not really able to speak on that at the moment.

  10695. I can see Mr Berryman grimacing, I know it is a problem but I think we have to deal with problems.
  (Mr Paris) In terms of predicting the engineering of the tunnel boring machine, that is not something I feel I can advance the Committee on.

  10696. Ms Serota: I really do not mind when the tunnel boring machine happens if we can guarantee that the insulation will we considerably above 25 decibels. We have moved out of Christ Church before and I can see how complex the logistics are of programming the tunnel because you cannot suddenly go and do another bit but at this stage as the design is not complete, I have not had the answer from Crossrail that I asked by email a few days ago, if the design is not confirmed, I would hoped that it could be changed at this stage to increase it very significantly.

  10697. Mr Elvin: As I have already said we can start at least two years in advance by giving a general indication of which portion of the year it is likely to be and progressively refine that. It means that we will be able to say to the festival two years in advance at least, "it is likely to be in this period of three months" and we will be able to progressively refine that over the time after that two years. It will not be a question of telling the festival two days before hand or anything like that, there will be a progressive approach as the work begins to warn the festival, firstly by giving that wide indication of a three month slot and then narrowing that down as time goes on.

  10698. Mr Binley: We have got to appreciate that the festival planning and the spending for the advertising and promotion of the festival takes place sizeably in advance of the whole festival and I think we have got to be a little more certain in a way than you are saying. I understand your difficulty but are you currently thinking we have got to do all we can to protect this festival.

  10699. Mr Elvin: As I said I can give the Committee assurance, we will take such steps as we can to notify as far in advance as possible. We are not talking about days, we are talking about a significant period of time to help with the festival planning. I am quite happy to call Mr Berryman in a moment to explain to you the difficulties, for example, of stopping the machine or slowing it down, it has major ramifications for the programme and it also creates difficulties in terms of settlement. The project is well aware of the significance of Christ Church as I have acknowledged already and clearly we will do what we can to work closely with the festival to make sure that as much warning as possible is given and we can do what we can to accommodate their needs. I cannot be more precise than that because of the logistics of such a project.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007