Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 11240 - 11259)

  11240. Also, I gather there is a start-up period between seven and eight in the morning before the working of eight until one on a Saturday, so that would mean more noise before 8 o'clock start time. Some people like a lie-in on a Saturday so that is not very nice for residents. That is all I wanted to say.

  11241. Mr Liddell-Grainger: Thank you very much indeed. Can I call Dr Susan Goodbody and Thomas Sparks.

  11242. Mr Elvin: The Petitioners own 19 Wilkes Street in the area. Their property is located above the eastbound running tunnel about 200 metres to the west of the proposed Hanbury Street shaft. You can see the 310, which is the petition number, next to the 195.[7] At the point of 19 Wilkes Street the tunnels will be more than 100 feet below the surface, some 36.5 metres below ground. Thank you, sir.


  The Petition of Dr Susan Goodbody and Mr Thomas Sparks

  The Petitioner appeared in person

  11243. Mr Liddell-Grainger: It is Dr Goodbody, is it?

  11244. Dr Goodbody: It is. My name is Susan Goodbody—and I am sorry Tom Sparks cannot be here today. As you have heard, I live at 19 Wilkes Street, right on top of the tunnel. We have been offered a settlement of 26mls. You have already heard arguments from many people as to why the tunnel should not be built under historic Spitalfields and I am not going to go into that again. As I understand it, Crossrail is intended to benefit all Londoners and I think that all Londoners should share in the cost. I have a very genuine fear that a very small minority of us are going to end up paying far, far more than our fair share of the cost, and I have come here today to ask you to prevent this and protect us.

  11245. Obviously I do not have time to go over all the points in our Petition, so I will concentrate on just two, and those are with respect to noise and the potential damage to our home. Here is what keeps me awake at night. I worry, genuinely, that ten or 12 years from now I will be sitting in my basement listening and going mad over the sound of trains running underneath me, and I phone Crossrail or whoever is involved at that point—it might not be Crossrail any more—and they will be, at best, unwilling to help me or, at worst, unable to help me because the tunnel will be a fait accompli and there will be nothing that they can do about it. So I am asking you, please protect me from this possible outcome.

  11246. Additionally, I also worry that if there is damage to my home then I will have to prove to Crossrail's satisfaction that this is as a result of the Crossrail link, and I do not see why I should be put in this position. I am not the one who is changing the status quo. I do not want to bear the cost or distress of litigation and I really do not believe that some independent person like me would have any hope of winning such litigation against a big outfit like Crossrail, with their access to legal teams that I have no possibility of matching. So I am worried about that.

  11247. I have a couple of very specific questions that I was hoping to put to Crossrail; is that going to be possible? Can I ask questions?

  11248. Mr Liddell-Grainger: Yes, you can. If you would like to address them to the Committee and I will ask Mr Elvin.

  11249. Dr Goodbody: So the threshold for noise that Crossrail are aiming to be under is 40 decibels. The 40 decibels is definitely audible across the majority of frequencies that the human ear can hear. When people talk about noise they often give an example of leaves rustling, and that is only ten decibels—that is thousands and thousands of times less than trains at 40 decibels. So I just want to ask Crossrail, presumably you have a mathematical model that you have produced to predict that the noise level will be less than 40 decibels, and if you do is it published and do we have access to it?

  11250. Mr Liddell-Grainger: Mr Elvin will be listening closely.

  11251. Mr Elvin: He is indeed.

  11252. Dr Goodbody: Also, in the response to our Petition Crossrail said that the threshold that they were aiming for was described as 40dBLAmax,S where "S" is a time constant of one second. To me, when I see time constants it makes me think is that correct? I want to know basically is this decibel level going to be across all frequencies? How much higher is it going to be, say, at 1000, 10,000 hertz? Could it be ten times higher, 100 times higher? I do not know. I am asking them basically what is the gain of this device at all frequencies? How much are these very audible frequencies and what would be the threshold that would have to be reached if you reached the normal time constants? I am not sure if I should—

  11253. Mr Liddell-Grainger: Please continue, Mr Elvin will be listening closely to what you say.

  11254. Dr Goodbody: One other question which was regarding the response. We have been told several times that there is going to be a survey of our property before tunnelling starts and I would like to know when this is actually going to happen. Will it involve going into the house and pulling up floorboards? What is it actually going to entail? That is what I want to say and if you could answer these questions I would be grateful.

  11255. In closing I would like to say, please uphold the request we made in our Petition. Please grant us an independent assessment of noise, vibration and settlement that we requested in our Petition and please require that Crossrail come to some agreement with us on an acceptable level of noise rather than impose one on us. Thank you very much.

  11256. Mr Liddell-Grainger: Mr Elvin, would you like to answer the questions?

  11257. Mr Elvin: Indeed, if the Committee would find it helpful Mr Thornely-Taylor can explain the issue with groundborne noise again.

  11258. Mr Liddell-Grainger: If you want to start off yourself, we have gone over that fairly carefully and we have had demonstrations on the ground noise. So if necessary we will call a witness but I think we have explored the area.

  11259. Mr Elvin: Can I first say that with regard to the assessment of the listed building, which is the Petitioner's property, that has been subject to a stage 3 settlement assessment, and as with the general undertaking that will be made available to the Petitioner and we will enter into any further discussions over that settlement report with the Petitioner to help understand it and to discuss it.


7   Crossrail Ref: P97, Location of individual Petitioners based in the Spitalfields Area (TOWNHLB-31003-002). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007