Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 15760 - 15779)

  15760. Mr George: I am prepared to leave it there—reminding you of the matters I said in opening. I am wholly satisfied that the Committee is aware of the urgency which is involved and the importance in these matters. Thank you, sir.

  15761. Mr Liddell-Grainger: I would just make one comment, Mr George. Thank you for pulling me up on the relationship between the House of Commons and the House of Lords. I can absolutely assure you that we will do the job as given the timetable we have. I can also assure that the conversations we have between this House and the House of Lords are always full and very frank. The noble Lords miss very little. You are very well aware that many of your esteemed colleagues sit there. I can assure you if you feel that anything may be "got past" by Crossrail, it will not. We do not have the time but our noble friends next door certainly will. I can assure you we will not be allowing them to miss a point.

  15762. Mr George: I intended no criticism of their Lordships' House. I am merely anxious that your Committee should perform its full task

  15763. Mr Liddell-Grainger: Mr George, thank you very much. Could I now call Mr Andrew Newcombe.



The Petition of the ExCel Centre.

Mr Andrew Newcombe QC appeared on behalf of the Petitioner.

Bircham Dyson Bell appeared as Agent.

  15764. Mr Liddell-Grainger: By way of opening, Ms Lieven, would you like to say anything?

  15765. Ms Lieven: Sir, I would. This has come on a mite faster than we had expected so there is a bit of desperate looking for the plan to show to the Committee. This is the Petition on behalf of what is known colloquially as the ExCel Centre.[60]


  15766. The Excel Centre is a very large exhibition centre in Docklands which members of the Committee may be familiar with, which is adjacent to the existing Custom House DLR station. In this location the Committee may remember (although in truth we have had very few petitions on this section before the Committee, so I do not know to what degree this will come as new material) that we are taking over this portion of the North London Line, a line the Committee has become very familiar with but in a slightly different bit of the North London Line; and Crossrail is emerging from a portal somewhat to the left of Custom House, taking over the North London Line and then running east past Royal Victoria Dock and off towards Abbey Wood. At the vicinity of ExCel, which is here, we need to do works in order to take over the North London Line and push the DLR lines very slightly to the south. The issue that arises in relation to the ExCel Centre, which is before this Committee (there have been other issues but those have all been agreed), is the impact on ExCel of those works pushing the DLR line to the south. Just so the Committee understand, one can see that it is a very constrained area, because the main road runs to the north of the tracks there. We obviously have the centre to the south. There is not very much room for manoeuvre at this location.

  15767. If I can put up our exhibits 17304A-002 we will get to the heart of the matter.[61] Sir, this is the centre. This is the existing position. There are three lorry areas, if I can put them like that. That is the lorry queuing area. The next one to the left is also a lorry queuing area. It is the blue one which is the existing lorry park which is in issue today. That is the existing situation.


  15768. If we can go on to 003, focussing in on the western area, the lorry holding area.[62] What this plan shows in the mustardy-yellow section is the area that Crossrail requires temporarily for worksite and working area related to the movement of the works here. The dark purple area is the permanent land-take that Crossrail requires. The reason we need permanent land there is because of the shifting of the DLR tracks to the south. There are three issues relating to this area which ExCel bring before the Committee.


  15769. The first is the temporary impact; the second is the permanent impact; and the third is compensation. So far as temporary impact is concerned, we will obviously hear from Mr Newcombe and his witnesses, but I believe we are very close to agreement on that (or perhaps not), but I will tell you what Crossrail has offered.

  15770. So far as the temporary situation is concerned, Crossrail have offered to ExCel, for the duration of the authorised works, that the Promoter agrees to use reasonable endeavours to procure provision for the temporary relocation of parking facilities to accommodate up to, and then the number of vehicles will be agreed with ExCel as to the number impacted.[63] Then the Promoter agrees, in consultation with LIEC, which is ExCel, to use all reasonable endeavours to limit the duration of its temporary occupancy and use of so much of the lorry park as is not to be permanently acquired, and to arrange for so much of the lorry park, as is not to be permanently acquired, to be reinstated to ExCel's reasonable satisfaction following completion of the works.


  15771. To put it colloquially, on temporary loss there are a number of sites in the vicinity of ExCel which we will work with, the key player, the London Development Agency to find and assist ExCel to use for the temporary period. We will obviously start by looking to see if there are sites on their own land.

  15772. The position is more difficult in relation to the permanent loss—we say it is perfectly straightforward but it is more difficult inasmuch as it is more difficult to find alternative sites.[64] The permanent loss the Committee will remember is this small, thin purple slither. The area is obviously much smaller than for the temporary loss. I have to say, we are not convinced at the moment (although we will obviously listen carefully to what Excel say in evidence) that there is going to be much, if any, material impact on parking here.


  15773. In any event, the issue seems to be something like parking for 16 HGVs, large HGVs. I think that is the maximum that ExCel themselves are in issue with. We say, we believe that there are a number of ways that ExCel could overcome that loss, if there really is a loss here, by using their existing spaces perhaps in slightly different ways.

  15774. Sir, if we can pan out on that plan for a moment so we see the whole thing. It is worth noting at this stage two points: one is, ExCel have an outline planning permission for what is known as "ExCel 2" over to the east; but even taking that into account, we still believe that, through the slight re-jigging of surface level car parking, there really is a concern about spaces for 16 artics but on the land we are taking there is space to put them in, on existing surface level parking even after ExCel 2.

  15775. The other point to make strongly in opening is that, if one goes back to Crossrail and Custom House station, the advent of Crossrail at this location will result in what we have come to know this morning as a "step change" in public transport provision for the ExCel Centre. At the moment it is served by DLR, doubtless a marvellous service, but nothing on the scale of Crossrail nor on the geographic scope of Crossrail. Once Crossrail arrives here there will be the ability of people to travel to ExCel by public transport from all over the South East with very great ease; and the station itself is being rebuilt for Crossrail. The Petition should be seen in the context of the truly enormous benefit to the ExCel Centre that Crossrail will bring, if one looks at the matter in the totality.

  15776. Sir, that is a brief outline. I am sure we will see much more detail of the car parking spaces. I hope that is all the Committee needs at this stage.

  15777. Mr Liddell-Grainger: Thank you, Ms Lieven; at this stage, yes.

  15778. Mr Newcombe: Sir, good afternoon. It is a privilege in three ways to appear before the Committee. Firstly, to be here; secondly, to follow my pupil master, Mr Charles George; and, thirdly, I am most honoured for the first time ever in my career he has allowed me to use his lectern. I thought I ought to record that on the parliamentary transcript.

  15779. Mr Liddell-Grainger: If you break it, Mr Newcombe, you will never hear the end of it! You need to be careful!


60   Crossrail Environmental Statement, Volume 4b, Custom House Station, Key Environmental Features-Map SE2(i), billdocuments.crossrail.co.uk (LINEWD-ES17-111). Back

61   Crossrail Ref: P111, Existing Lorry Parking Areas (NEWMLB-7304A-002). Back

62   Crossrail Ref: P111, Proposed Lorry Parking Areas (NEWMLB-7304A-003). Back

63   Crossrail Ref: P111, Temporary acquisition of the Lorry Park as a worksite (SCN-20060713-001 to -003). Back

64   Crossrail Ref: P111, Proposed Lorry Parking Areas (NEWMLB-7304A-003). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007