Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 16040 - 16050)

  16040. As I say, that is being worked on and you have just laid down a market that it is critically important?
  (Mr Taylor) It is, yes.

  16041. So far as the third matter is concerned, to work with the rail served tenants to reconfigure the site and so forth, and to permit construction of the dive-under and the existing rail served activity, we understand that to be part of AP3 and, therefore, it is premature at this stage; but how important is it to Mendip Rail that you are still able to have access to that site and to the existing tenants there to take your aggregate?
  (Mr Taylor) As was shown by my diagram earlier on, I think it is essential for the operation of our trains through the yard and also to the sites that we have got at Acton, which are my two customers; and we must have continuous supply to them.

  16042. Could we go back to what we had up there. There is a reference there to the "dive-under", how important is that?
  (Mr Taylor) Again, I think it is essential.

  16043. There was talk about the up relief-line at Acton on Tuesday evening. Do you remember that?
  (Mr Taylor) I do.

  16044. I think at the present you do not send any trains directly north of Acton; they all go into Acton and you split up your trains there. Is that right?

   (Mr Taylor) That is correct.

  16045. The time might come when you no longer had a contractual relationship with EWS, so what is your view about this up relief-line?

   (Mr Taylor) I think there was a comment made by Ms Durham yesterday which I think was that it is essential. If EWS have got full control of the yard that would affect competition and us using different train operators through the site. Also, in the case of any disruption, you have got an alternative line there which is controlled by Network Rail, I imagine.

  16046. The last matter here is Plumstead, which is one of the strategic sites in which you are about to acquire an interest. We do not need an exhibit. When Mr Berryman gave evidence, Day 51A at paragraph 15050, he said that was going to look at the question as to whether it was possible to maintain a freight site at Plumstead. How important is it that there should be a freight site at Plumstead?
  (Mr Taylor) It is very important because the South East of London is developing, and certainly we have been looking for the last two or three years at putting a depot in that area.

  16047. The Thames Gateway area, which is one of the focuses of the Government's planning, has a substantial area south of the river, does it not, just east of Plumstead?
  (Mr Taylor) Yes, and there are very limited strategic freight sites in that part of the world. Graham Smith made a comment about "must have rail access"; but any site must have road access as well, planning permissions and also areas to stock materials.

  16048. Can we put up on the screen your exhibit MRL3, dealing with compensation.[106] Could we please zoom in on it. I explained that you are seeking a special compensation. Can you please explain the two circumstances during construction which are likely to lead to loss which will be uncompensated unless you have a special provision?
  (Mr Taylor) Yes, one will be extended journeys for trains, so we will have to purchase more wagons and locomotives to run our existing business.

  16049. Mr George: Why will there be extended journeys to trains?

  16050. Mr Liddell-Grainger: I suspend the sitting until Tuesday, 10 o'clock. There is a division in the House.








106   Committee Ref: Acton Yard, Plain English Heads of terms - The Promoter's position (SCN-20060713-011). Back


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007