Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 16780 - 16788)

  16780. We would like the Committee to recognise the importance of this bridge and to approve our amendment so as to keep the bridge and save the public right of way. Although this Petition is brought on behalf of OSS and the RA, it is in a sense brought for the public as well. It is not for our own interests, it is to safeguard the way for the benefit of the public. On behalf of the OSS and the Ramblers, thank you very much.

  16781. Chairman: Thank you.

  16782. Ms Lieven: Sir, there is just one very small point. Mr Suggett made reference to us doing a survey at seven to 10 in the morning. I do not want the Committee to think there was anything nefarious about that. There was one earlier survey done in April on a Thursday to check whether there was any commuting, anybody walking to school or work, and that was done in the morning to check whether there were any movements but, again, all the answers were zero. That was why it was done at seven to ten, it was not in order to catch non-ramblers on a Sunday morning.

  16783. Chairman: Mr Suggett, you do have the last word.

  16784. Mr Suggett: We were not supposing there was any nefarious choice of that time, we simply make the point that use can be irregular.

  16785. Chairman: Thank you very much, that concludes the Petition. What I am going to do now is suspend the Committee and clear the room whilst we consider this particular matter. Just for a bit of organisational help, it might be better if we leave the room and you stay.

  After a short break

  16786. Chairman: Can I just say that the Committee has had a deliberation on this. We want to say that we are not minded to apply for extra provision to require a new bridge or replacement bridge to be built. However—however—we are not minded either to make a decision on this matter today. We want the parties to go away and examine other ways that might facilitate a solution of the problem, and therefore we ask them to keep on discussing matters. We are perturbed and we have not closed the decision that we may retain a foot access over this line. However, we are not minded at this present time to make application for provision for a replacement bridge to be built. So we are asking for the Promoters and the Petitioners to go away and see if there are ways there that a solution can be found and to do that as quickly as possible, and when that is done we will return to the subject in due course.

  16787. Now, ladies and gentlemen, this is the finest announcement that I have had to make in the last seven months. We are about to break, other than for a private session in September for Committee members and others who are invited to be at that meeting, for the summer recess, long after our colleagues have already disappeared over the nearest horizon! We wish you all a very pleasant summer and hope to see you all when we return.

  16788. Ms Lieven: Sir, on behalf of the Promoters and the Counsel team, we wish all the Committee a very good summer and a very well-earned break, at least from Crossrail. I know you will be working but at least it will be a break from Crossrail.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007