Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 17740 - 17749)

  17740. Chairman: Mr Chambers, you have the last word.

  17741. Mr Chambers: It sounds good but given that I have written to them and asked them to do just that, or at least possibly not in the exact phraseology but I was asking for a valuation based on the estate agent and then wrote a letter saying that that is what I think and that is what the monetary value should be, to me that is the beginning of that process of doing exactly that. The response was that the nominal value would be £50 and they did not think there was any injurious affection. So there is a disconnection between what he is saying—

  17742. Chairman: What I am going to ask, Mr Chambers, is that a copy of the relevant passages is forwarded to you by the Promoter. Also, we will forward to you a copy of today's minutes and contained within the minutes will be what Mr Mould has actually put on record.

  17743. Mr Mould: Mr Smith has been sitting here patiently to deal with the Petitions that are now going to be heard at another date, but he has just said that he will happily spend 10 minutes with Mr Chambers.

  17744. Chairman: That is a further offer on top of the two things we have said we will do anyway. Is that satisfactory?

  17745. Mr Chambers: I think so.

  17746. Chairman: On the matter of all these cases, we will review them all individually but the worries and concerns which you raised in the course of your address, I think, much of it has been addressed by Mr Mould. If you have further worries or concerns please take the opportunity—

  17747. Mr Chambers: On a general note for everybody else in this situation, it seems a bit as if the aim of the game is basically to pay nothing if they can get away with paying nothing and not being a little bit more proactive in trying to work out what a reasonable value would be and going to people and just sorting it out.

  17748. Chairman: I think it is a valid view which you are putting forward, but the Committee has heard contrary to that. There is an established system on compensation. There is also a whole variety of different cases which have been made to us under land compensation—very different from your own—and they range from the commercial to individual homeowners. It is not all the same. It is very much we have proof and they are attempting to follow the guidelines, but there are lots of different instances and cases, and a lot of people have lots of different views about what has been occurring. Certainly you need to worry about your Petition today rather than everybody else's.

  17749. That concludes today. Can I just inform everybody that if a Petitioner wishes to be with us tomorrow we will leave New Palace Yard by bus at 10.00 am tomorrow. We will visit Woolwich and the site at Woolwich, and we will then return and restart these proceedings at 2.30 tomorrow afternoon.






 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007