Select Committee on Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 17759 - 17767)

Ordered that Counsel and Parties be called in.

Promoter's response to the Committee Statement on Woolwich Station

  17759. Chairman: Can I remind everybody who is here this morning that we will be conveniently breaking at about 11.30 for people who wish to get a coffee, and then we will resume at about 11.50. We will give you an exact time nearer the time. Mr Elvin, it is very good to see you since the summer recess. Have you brought good or bad tidings to our statement last week?

  17760. Mr Elvin: It is not a statement which I think the Committee will welcome. I have been asked by the Secretary of State to make a statement this morning in response to what you said last Thursday afternoon. Sir, I am asked to convey to the Committee that the Secretary of State has considered very carefully the views of the Committee as communicated to us last Thursday, and of course it goes without saying that he accepts that it is for the House to determine what goes into legislation and what does not. The Secretary of State regrets, however, that he is unable to accede to the Committee's request to include a station at Woolwich, within the Promoter's draft AP3 instruction to be placed before the House. He has already explained his reasons for this, namely the considerable extra cost which it would add when he is seeking to drive down the costs of the project.

  17761. The Secretary of State, however, does wish to reassure the Committee that the question of Woolwich was looked at in some detail during the summer months, following the announcement of the Committee's interim conclusions. This included consideration of whether it would be possible to build a station at Woolwich without incurring similar significant costs in comparison to the type of station which was examined by the Committee.

  17762. The Secretary of State's position was not a knee-jerk reaction to the Committee's conclusions. Indeed, I am asked to make it clear to the Committee that the new Secretary of State looked at the issue afresh and did not simply rubberstamp the view of the earlier Secretary of State.

  17763. However, sir, I am asked to draw your attention, perhaps, you may think, to the obvious, that since AP3 requires an instruction from the House the content of AP3 will be something which has, in any event, to be determined by the House. The timing of the instruction to debate, of course, is not a matter for the Secretary of State, but it is understood it is likely to be in the near future. Given the clear and strong view of the Committee on the issue of a new station at Woolwich the Secretary of State anticipates that this issue will arise as part of the debate by the House on the instruction motion. In that connection the Secretary of State understands from what was said last week that the Committee may wish to lay a special report before the House; it therefore seems likely that the issue of Woolwich will be a matter for the decision of the House.

  17764. Sir, that is the statement I am asked to give to the Committee.

  17765. Chairman: Mr Elvin, I think what we had better do is to clear the Committee and give the Members who are present the opportunity to discuss it for a few short moments.

  After a short break

  17766. Chairman: Mr Elvin, can I tell you that the Committee Members who are here present have reflected on the statement you asked to be read out to the Members of the Committee. We are astonished, quite frankly, about the decision of the Secretary of State to, for the second time, dismiss the view of this Committee after many days of taking evidence to this Select Committee. It is unprecedented; it happened the first time and likewise the second time we are not willing to accept that. What we have decided is that we need time to reflect on that and we are not going to sit as a Committee for the remainder of this week. We are going to come back next Tuesday where we will have time to reflect and meet with one another and discuss this matter, and then we will decide whether or not we shall sit on. In the meantime, I will try to make contact with the Secretary of State to repeat the view which I have just given you now.

  17767. Mr Elvin: Very well, sir.






 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 November 2007