Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Arts Council England

INTRODUCTION

  1.  Arts Council England works to get more art to more people in more places. We develop and promote the arts across England, acting as an independent body at arm's length from government. Between 2006 and 2008, we will invest £1.1 billion of public money from government and the National Lottery in supporting the arts. This is the bedrock of support for the arts in England.

  2.  After our submission to the inquiry on Protecting and Preserving our Heritage, we are delighted that the committee has now decided to focus on museums and galleries, cultural property and archives. The committee's decision is particularly timely for us because Our agenda for the arts commits us to prioritising the contemporary visual arts. In line with this commitment, we recently published Turning Point, our 10-year strategy for the contemporary visual arts. The main emphasis of the strategy is on linking contemporary art with art from the past and heritage and it sets the development of regional collections as a priority.

  3.  As we set out in our submission to the committee's previous inquiry, we believe public collections must fully represent contemporary art and practice and contemporary culture to ensure we leave as rich a legacy as we inherited. This submission examines the major and pressing issues that need to be addressed.

  4.  Collections can be national or regional, public or private. They may or may not be based in a building. They cut across the fields of heritage and contemporary. Arts Council England is part of a wider sector including government-funded national institutions such as Tate and other national museums, libraries and archives other national heritage bodies, regional museums run by local authority leisure services, university museums and galleries, heritage agencies, private trusts and foundations, the commercial art market and the publishing industry. Within this wider sector, we work in partnership with the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (MLA), the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF), local authorities and the national museums and collections.

  5.  We are concerned that for most museums active collecting is not a priority. The Art Fund Survey: The Collecting Challenge (2006) reported that of the 305 returns (one sixth of accredited museums) just 2% prioritised collecting, 60% were unable to allocate any funds to collecting and 51% said that lack of funding and lack of expertise were the main reasons for the lack of active acquisition. 85% said that shortage of space for display or storage is a serious obstacle to collecting.

FUNDING

  6.  Current resources for acquisitions, at a national and at a regional level, mean that works of art, including contemporary artworks, are leaving the UK. As the Director of the Victoria & Albert Museum argues in a recent paper "in real terms the public funding devoted to acquisition in 2004-05 was worth only 13% of that available in 1980-81." The committee will know of the funding pressures facing local authorities. Museums, as non-statutory services, continue to face a squeeze on their resources which may limit the benefits of new DCMS investment through the MLA Renaissance programme. Our research across the visual arts demonstrates that operating budgets and staffing are inadequate for the task of addressing both public access programmes and the longstanding issues of documentation, new acquisitions and collections care. Indeed, it was claimed recently that some major regional galleries have exhibition budgets of less than £20,000 a year. The findings on leadership and workforce mobility and diversity also indicate a serious barrier to the growth of dynamic contemporary collections which reflect contemporary Britain: 93% of the visual arts workforce is white, 75% is female, 65% is aged under 45 and the representation of black and minority ethnic groups is low at 5%.

  7.  The Contemporary Art Society's Special Collections Scheme demonstrated the impact that new investment in collections can have. The scheme, which was supported through Arts Council Lottery funds, £2.5 million over five years, led to 600 acquisitions for regional collections but it was time limited and involved only 15 museums and galleries. This is an issue we raised when, earlier this year, we made our successful bid to the DCMS to remain as a Lottery Good Cause. We would like to develop the concept much further and create a long-term opportunity for many more museums and galleries. Our focus on the contemporary would work in tandem with the Heritage Lottery Fund's existing support for works over 10 years old.

GROWING PRIVATE PATRONAGE

  8.  As we mentioned in our earlier submission, we would invite the committee consider the recommendations made by Sir Nicholas Goodison in his 2003 report Securing the best for our museums: private giving and government support, particularly those relating to increasing the funding of the National Heritage Memorial Fund to £20 million and to lifetime giving. On this second point, the committee may wish to consider how Ireland and Australia have dealt with this issue in their tax systems which offer a different approach to that of the United States.

MATCHING FUNDING WITH EXPERTISE

  9.  Turning Point—our 10-year strategy for the contemporary visual arts—was published in June 2006.  Developed with an advisory group of senior representatives from across the visual arts, including the museums and heritage sectors, it was informed by substantial research and consultation. This argued for greater linkages between the historical and the contemporary and for the integration of planning and investment in the visual arts. The strategy sets out priorities to address significant challenges, including developing regional collections, over the long term.

  10.  England's museums and galleries have excelled in opening up access to their collections and in their work with young people, paralleling work that we have undertaken across the arts sector. However, as the committee will be aware from our submission to its previous inquiry, we are concerned that regional collections in England do not represent the art of our time and cannot compare with collections in the Netherlands, France and Germany.

  11.  Although funding is a major issue, building collections in England comparable with our European counterparts must start with attracting and retaining expertise in contemporary art that would encourage greater collaboration among museums, galleries and other cultural bodies and, importantly, lever in funds for acquisitions from trusts and foundations to augment public financing.

BUILDING EXPERTISE

  12.  Museums and galleries that are accessible and have strong exhibition and public programmes of education and learning depend on well-managed collections that both preserve the past and reflect contemporary culture. Successive reports, most recently the Museums Association's Collections for the Future focus on the challenges of collection management and offer some pragmatic solutions.

  13.  New ways of working in the museums and gallery sector, especially through the new investment of the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council's Renaissance programme and the new hub structure, have succeeded in advancing access and learning. Barriers to the strategic development of contemporary collections management remain in the form of the expertise at the disposal of museum and gallery staff. One solution may be to bring together the visual arts organisations in a region so that museums and galleries can benefit from a wider range of expertise and experience.

  14.  To address this issue, we have convened a Regional Collections Group. As well as overseeing the set-up of an MLA Specialist Sector Network, the Group will test the feasibility of regional consortia of visual arts organisations coming together to share expertise and resources to commission and acquire new work. A model for this work could be the consortium formed by Bristol Museums and Galleries with Arts Council-funded visual arts organisations in Bristol. Similarly, in the East Midlands, with funding from the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, we are leading the Museummaker initiative where 19 museums are collaborating in commissioning contemporary crafts.

ACCESSING OUR COLLECTIONS

  15.  A national strategy for developing regional contemporary collections requires a database of current holdings and new public and private partnerships to lever new investment for acquisition and for storage. Many collections are not fully documented, which means that museums and galleries are often unable to find out what works are available for loans. We are working with MLA and Tate to set up a database of current holdings of work post-1970 to be completed in 2007.  

  16.  Ideally, collections should be appropriately displayed and where they are stored, they should be accessible. The lack of adequate storage for museum collections is a serious barrier to collecting contemporary work, which can include large and complex installations. The DCMS paper Measurement and Improvement Collection Storage Excellence Study (1999) and the HLF report Museum Needs Assessments (2002) acknowledged the problem and the need for collaborative solutions. As part of its management of the Arts Council Collection, the Hayward Gallery runs two accessible storage and handling facilities: for sculpture, at the Yorkshire Sculpture Park, the capital cost of which was part funded by the Henry Moore Foundation, and, for two-dimensional work, in London.

  17.  The national and regional collections are our national inheritance and will form part of our legacy. Their cost and their effective management is both a national and regional responsibility. We believe there is also the potential for commercial private sector partnership but this requires storage strategies and audits of space requirements which need new public investment. An exemplar is the Museums and Galleries of Northern Ireland, which has conducted a full audit with the Northern Ireland Audit Office and have completed a storage planning strategy and negotiated provision with a private supplier.

  18.  As we mentioned in our submission to the committee's previous inquiry, the creative industries too can help bring collections closer to people and make them more relevant both to their lives and to the way in which they perceive themselves and their communities. We are working with the BBC to provide online content for the forthcoming BBC 1 series Simon Schama's The Power of Art which engages contemporary artists to direct viewers to their own regional museum collections. The digitisation of publicly funded collections and archives will broaden their availability, widen access and bring heritage closer to people. The Arts Council Collection will shortly be online and the Hayward is seeking further trust funding to develop the site.

  19.  Our partnership with the National Film and TV Archive and the University of Westminster will provide online access for researchers to the Arts Council's film archive. From 1953 to 1999, the Arts Council commissioned or produced 485 films recording all aspects of—mainly contemporary British—art. The collection, including rare material about individual artists, writers and architects as well as films on particular art movements, will provide an invaluable public research resource.

CONSERVING CULTURAL PROPERTIES

  20.  It is the responsibility of the present to conserve for future generations a record of our contemporary culture and how it has been created. This legacy is to be found increasingly in records of the creative process across the art forms as well as the results of that creativity. In the same way that we must conserve great art and architecture for our appreciation now and in the future, we must collect and give access to material on what inspired the people who made them and how they worked.

  21.  The need to safeguard significant buildings and works of art for the nation is widely acknowledged and systems such as the Reviewing Committee on the Export of Works of Art exist to ensure this but too often fail as market values exceed the ability of public collections to raise the necessary funds. This is now regarded as ineffective and the number of cases now referred is tiny, less than 1% of items for which an export licence is requested. This is one of several challenges we would bring to the committee's attention. Film, oral and sound records provide an invaluable resource to people seeking to understand not only what inspired artists and creative people but also how they worked and related to what was going on around them. All too often, when an artist or architect dies, while key examples of their work may be conserved, their archives and material relating to their working practices are lost. An example is the archive of the great British architect James Stirling, which was documented with a grant from Arts Council England. The archive was later sold to the Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montreal.

2 October 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 25 June 2007