Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by The Art Fund

  1.  This supplementary memorandum follows on from the written evidence submitted by The Art Fund to the Committee's inquiry in September 2006. This memorandum focuses on philanthropy.

THE FUNDING CHALLENGE

  2.  At present in the UK, the financing of our museums relies neither on the generosity of private philanthropists nor on the patronage of the state but on an uneasy combination of the two.

  3.  The Art Fund Museum Survey 2006. The Collecting Challenge, revealed that UK museums struggle to collect actively; less than 10% of UK museums allocated a fixed proportion of their income to collecting in 2005.

  4.  The international perspective is also of concern. New research from The Art Fund—a survey of international collecting trends—showed that our national museums lag far behind other world-class museums when it comes to money available to buy new works of art. In 2004-05 The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, for example, was able to spend more than eight times as much as the National Gallery, London and a staggering 70 times as much as the British Museum.

PHILANTHROPY

  5.  The Art Fund believes that new tax incentives (relating to income tax—rather than inheritance tax liabilities) for gifts of cultural assets would stimulate individual philanthropy at marginal additional costs to the taxpayer and should result in a significant enrichment of our collections.

  6.  Museums in the US and France, most notably, benefit from significant income tax incentives; for example, in the US there is an income tax deducation for 100% of the value of gifts of cash or works of art to museums (in our survey) from their American Friends in 2004-05 amounted to more than the value of the works they received under the Acceptance in Lieu scheme (£5,762,744, compared to £5,169,290) and considerably more than they received from individual givers in the UK.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  7.  There is no single solution but it is vital that we think more creatively about how best to attract private money and encourage a culture of giving.

  8.  The Government should examine the benefits of both corporate and individual tax incentives.

  9.  The Art Fund will continue to promote a relief against income tax for gifts of cultural assets ("Living and Giving" was rejected by the Treasury 2005).

January 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 25 June 2007