Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Professor Julian Petley

  I note from the current issue of Press Gazette that the Select Committee of which you are Chairman is thinking of holding an inquiry into whether press self-regulation is currently working successfully.

  I'm writing to you in a number of capacities—as co-chair of the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom, a member of the board of Index on Censorship, a former journalist and trustee of MediaWise, and also as the convenor of an MA in journalism here at Brunel—to encourage you most strongly to hold such an inquiry.

  Over recent years, I have carried out a fair amount of work on the Press Complaints Commission; I am enclosing some of it and I hope that you will find it of interest.[4] As you will see, it is all extremely critical of the Commission. The conclusion to which I have come, regretfully, is that the Commission is so far from being independent of the medium which it is supposed to be regulating that its only real function is as a PR device for the press industry. It produces a great deal of rhetoric about the importance of preserving press freedom, which is indeed vital to any democracy, but what it appears to mean by this, in the last analysis, is simply the freedom of press owners do with their newspapers exactly what they will. It also appears to be a freedom (and a power) quite devoid of any concomitant sense of responsibility. Furthermore, by repeatedly failing to criticise what most people regard as the excesses of the press, it actually weakens the case for press freedom (in the proper sense of the term) in the eyes of the majority. This is hardly a healthy state of affairs in a democracy.

  I should stress that in no way am I advocating greater censorship of the press—either via statute or by the PCC. Indeed, I am a particularly firm supporter of the "publish and be damned" principle. However, the problem is that the PCC is quite incapable of damning anything remotely effectively—unlike, for example, the Advertising Standards Authority, which is a successful, respected, self-regulatory body with its own teeth, and ought to serve as a model for the PCC.

February 2007





4   Not printed. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 11 July 2007