Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 300 - 301)

TUESDAY 13 JUNE 2006

MR JOHN HAMBLEY, MR NICK BETTS AND MR FRED PERKINS

  Q300  Alan Keen: It is not limitless though because politicians could not afford it because politicians get the blame for what the BBC does, so it is not limitless, is it?

  Mr Betts: We need a good, mixed economy of people who can make sensible commercial businesses out of entertaining and informing people in this country, sitting alongside the public service broadcaster. I cannot say the line lies here or here but there needs to be a good, rigorous system for defining where that line is. I do not have the answer for where the line is.

  Chairman: We do need to give the BBC a chance but a last question from Paul Farrelly.

  Q301  Paul Farrelly: Unlike Alan Keen, subscribing to Middlesbrough FC would not be top of my priorities, but I would defend the right of Middlesbrough FC TV (has it got off the ground yet?) to have a fair run without being crowded out. Just as Port Vale have got a man in the Trinidad and Tobago side, Middlesbrough have now got a winger in the England side at the moment. We have got the massed ranks of the BBC here, they are on next, and clearly they have made on agreement with PACT. Your situation is not as analogous as the PACT situation with the BBC, but would it be naive of me to urge the BBC to come to a memorandum of understanding with a group such as your, which includes UKTV, so that we can have less conflict in these matters and more transparency?

  Mr Hambley: I am sure we could have interesting discussions. We would probably need a referee and I do not volunteer for that. It is perfectly true that in general our members have only had unilateral discussions about their own businesses with the BBC and other terrestrial broadcasters. It is conceivable on the issue of secondary rights when the PACT agreements are all done and dusted, we could seek a forum to discuss these things with the BBC. The danger is, however, that all the options are foreclosed by the discussions that have already taken place.

  Mr Perkins: I think too that the feeling from many of the small players in these markets is one of fear, that if they go along to the BBC with a proposition or an idea, then the BBC has the ability to say, "Gosh, what a stunning idea and, by coincidence, we thought about it last week." That is the fear. Sky is in the same position. For smaller members Sky has the power of life and death over us all; the BBC just has the power of death. They are both very able competitors. We have to work with them variously in different ways. It is a very difficult one and the BBC historically, and I have seen it publishing, remember the digital curriculum the BBC decided was a great thing for it to get involved in, as a result of which many publishers disappeared or gave up entirely educational publishing because the BBC in its ambitions in that area saw fit to extend its own remit. It is very difficult having a discussion with a competitor that is 100 or 1,000 times your size.

  Chairman: We must now move on. Thank you very much indeed.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 16 May 2007