Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Third Report


2  The Call TV quiz sector

How the programmes work

5. Quiz shows in which callers use a premium rate telephone line to call a studio to take part in a quiz or game are not new and have been a feature of television and radio programming for about 20 years.[1] The traditional format for such shows is for a viewer to call or text a premium rate service with the answer to a question, and the winning participant is the one selected at random from the pool of those who have answered correctly. Call TV quiz shows differ in one important respect: the random selection is made before any participant has a chance to answer the question. To win a prize, a person has to succeed in being connected to the studio and in then giving a correct answer.

6. The games themselves vary widely. Viewers may simply be asked to solve an anagram; in some cases the reordering of letters is minimal. Some puzzles require competitors to add figures and give the total. In others (commonly known as tower games), a word is shown on-screen (such as "red"); producers draw up a selection of words connected to the displayed word (such as "letter", "rose" or "line") but conceal that list, and participants are then invited to guess one of the connected words from the concealed list.

7. Viewers are encouraged to take part by a presenter and by messages on-screen. All Call TV quiz competitions can be entered by making a phone call to a premium rate number. The charges for those calls vary both from programme to programme and according to the network on which the call is made. Typically, there will be a flat rate charge of 75 pence for calling on a BT land line,[2] and a higher charge (possibly double that) for using a mobile network. These are flat rate charges which apply as soon as the call is connected to the programme's telephony apparatus, whether or not the call is selected to be put on hold or put through to the presenter, and whatever the duration of the call. Some competitions can also be entered by texting premium rate numbers, for which similar charges are made.

8. A random selection of callers is then made by computer. The vast majority of callers do not get an opportunity to give their answer: they merely hear a recorded message telling them that they have not been successful on that occasion. The remainder - generally a tiny minority - are either connected to the studio or are put on hold before undergoing a further random selection process.[3] Callers who are connected and who give a correct answer win a prize, which could be anything from £20 to £100,000.[4]

9. Most Call TV quiz programmes also offer an entry route using the internet as an alternative to calling a premium rate phone number. This is often referred to as the "free entry" route, although it does not necessarily follow that viewers can make use of it without spending any money at all - domestic internet access is normally paid for even if it comes "free" as part of a paid-for communications package. Entrants using the internet entry route register their details, including a phone number, on the programme's website. Those selected to go on to the next stage either are given a PIN number which enables them to make a free call to the programme, or the programme calls them. Producers and broadcasters maintained that players using the free entry route and those using a paid route were treated equally in the selection process.[5] Evidence to our inquiry showed the proportion of entries using the internet route as varying from 30%[6] to 63%;[7] the proportion of winners using the internet route ranged from 27% for shows on ITV1 with high viewing figures to 60% for shows on the dedicated ITV Play digital channel.[8]

The growth of the sector

10. Call TV quiz shows, of the format described above, barely existed two years ago: they are a recent phenomenon which has mushroomed since early 2005. DCMS and Ofcom told us that digital television had hugely increased the capacity for new channels and had driven the development of new revenue models for broadcasters.[9] We also note that the use of premium rate lines is becoming a feature of mainstream programming as a method of boosting revenue. Channel Five Broadcasting ("Five") set out the broadcaster viewpoint neatly:

    "This form of participation TV offers the potential to open up a significant new revenue stream for broadcasters, worth several million pounds a year. For Five, the revenue that we make from this programming will partially mitigate the impact of this year's downturn in television advertising revenue. In the longer term, it may help make Five slightly less reliant on an increasingly volatile advertising market. Thus it will help underpin our business; help us face the challenge of increased competition from the growth of digital television and new media; and assist our ability to continue delivering a wide range of public service broadcasting".[10]

This statement was echoed by ITV,[11] Channel 4,[12] Big Game TV (which both operates a dedicated Call TV quiz channel and produces Call TV quiz programming for other channels),[13] and Ostrich Media (a producer of games show programmes).[14]

11. As Ofcom observed, precise industry data on Call TV quiz shows is difficult to source.[15] It cited figures for "interactive services" (which cover more than Call TV quiz programming) showing an income of £104 million for the television industry in 2005;[16] but it also noted that various industry commentators and researchers had suggested an estimated revenue of between £120 million and £160 million per annum generated specifically by TV quiz shows.[17] Mediatique, a research firm specialising in media industries, provided us with an estimate of £80 million for Call TV industry revenue in 2005 and forecast compound growth of 33% per year until 2010, when it expected some £320 million to be generated.[18] The only hard figures for Call TV quiz shows supplied to us were from ITV, which reported £27 million revenue from its ITV Play channel in the first six months of 2006, £9 million of which was profit.[19] According to DCMS, ITV has indicated that ITV Play could make £20 million in profits from £60 million in revenue in its first year, equating to £55,000 profit for every day of operation.[20]

12. The profits being made from Call TV quiz programming have begun to catch media and public attention and to attract criticism, particularly as the cost of producing shows can be very low: Mediatique told us that some operators spent less than £1,000 for an hour of Call TV programming.[21] Broadcasters defended their position, however; Sparrowhawk Entertainment (which broadcasts the Hallmark Channel and Movies 24 Pay TV channels) told us that the Hallmark Channel Quiz was "not a licence to print money" as had been alleged by the media in respect of some other Call TV programmes, and it stated that only a minority of the 75 pence charge actually passed to the broadcaster once production costs, prize money and charges to the telephony partner had been paid.[22] "Five" saw the revenue generated by Call TV quiz programming as a "welcome but modest" complement to revenue from spot advertising; and it pointed out that there was no guarantee that current levels of interest in quiz shows would be maintained in the long run.[23]

13. There has been some consolidation of the market. Mr Brook, the chairman of Optimistic Entertainment, told us that most of the "cowboys" had left the sector.[24] Ofcom told us that there had been a "significant increase" in the volume of Call TV quiz shows being broadcast since early 2005, but it noted a fall in recent months in the number of licensees providing such shows, as broadcasters left the market.[25] Channel 4 used to operate a dedicated Call TV quiz channel - Quiz Call - and told us that at the time of the channel's launch "there was a prospect of generating significant surpluses that could be ploughed back in to the core Channel 4 business". It has recently disposed of its stake in the channel "due to increasing competition in the market for quiz channels".[26] The prospect of a new legislative and regulatory framework may also cause established players to pull out of the market, for reasons which we explore below.

Regulation of the sector

14. No single body has responsibility for the regulation of Call TV quiz programmes. Their broadcast content is subject to regulation by Ofcom, the use of premium rate telephony is regulated by the Independent Committee for the Supervision of Standards of Telephone Information Services (ICSTIS) and, when the Gambling Act 2005 comes fully into force in September 2007, at least some Call TV quiz programmes may be subject to regulatory controls under the Act.

15. Ofcom published its Broadcasting Code in July 2005, setting out the editorial standards with which all Ofcom licensees must comply. The Code introduced for the first time a rule concerning the conduct of competitions on television services, stating that "competitions should be conducted fairly, prizes should be described accurately, and rules should be clear and appropriately made known".[27] In response to complaints from viewers, focussing on the ease or difficulty of the competitions, clarity concerning correct answers, the transparency of competition rules, and other issues, Ofcom published guidance in April 2006 to assist broadcasters in their interpretation of the rule.[28] This guidance includes recommendations and expectations on the availability and despatch of prizes, clarity of competition rules, and games methodologies.[29] Ofcom has recently announced a consultation on whether participation TV (of which Call TV quiz shows are one form) should be categorised as advertising rather than editorial content, so that it would be subject to the Advertising Code rather than the Broadcasting Code.[30]

16. ICSTIS issued a Statement of Expectations for Call TV Quiz Services in January 2006, following a consultation exercise opened in September 2005. The Statement was prompted by an increase in the number of complaints and inquiries received by ICSTIS about Call TV quiz services.[31] It clarifies the way in which the ICSTIS Code of Practice applies to such services and sets standards for:

—  clarity of pricing;

—  clarity over charging for failed entry calls;

—  provision of relevant terms and conditions; and

—  the use of clocks and other countdown triggers to stimulate calls.

Failure to meet the standards amounts to a breach of the ICSTIS Code of Practice and can lead to sanctions such as a formal reprimand, an order to pay reasonable compensation, imposition of a fine of up to £250,000, barring access to services, and banning named individuals from operating services for set periods.[32]

17. ICSTIS announced, when issuing the Statement of Expectations, that it would keep the Call TV quiz format under review and would undertake periodic monitoring exercises to ensure that the necessary level of consumer protection was maintained.[33] Acknowledging that the market is a "fast-moving one",[34] and in the light of continuing complaints, ICSTIS has since embarked upon a new, detailed review of the format. The review has examined levels of transparency about what is involved in participating, whether statements made on-screen by presenters are accurate, whether there is evidence of excessive use by callers, whether prizes are issued quickly and "with certainty", and whether free web entry routes are genuine alternatives to paying for a premium rate call.[35] ICSTIS expects to announce its findings soon.

18. The Gambling Commission was created by the Gambling Act 2005; it was set up in October 2005 and replaces the Gaming Board of Great Britain as the gambling regulator. The Commission has a major task in drawing up a full regulatory framework for the industry by the time that the Act comes fully into force in September 2007. As part of this effort, it has launched a consultation on the distinctions under the Gambling Act between prize competitions, lotteries, and free draws.[36] The Commission told the Department that it expects to issue its response "in the New Year".[37] We consider some of the issues raised in the consultation - and their relevance to free entry mechanisms - in more detail below (at paragraphs 24 to 29).

Complaints to Ofcom and ICSTIS

19. Ofcom's guidance on interpretation of Rule 2.11 of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code explains that complaints about the broadcasting of information about premium rate services would normally be for ICSTIS to handle, whereas complaints about fairness in the conduct of a competition, or its solution or methodology, would normally be investigated by Ofcom. Both Ofcom and ICSTIS have received substantial numbers of complaints about Call TV quiz services. In 2005, Ofcom received 500 such complaints; but it expects to have received more than 800 in 2006.[38] Complaints to ICSTIS rose in late 2005 but fell rapidly after the Statement of Expectations had been issued in January 2006. Numbers have risen slightly since.[39] Some of the generic complaints are examined in this report.


1   DCMS Ev 66 Back

2   ITV Ev 36 Back

3   ITV Ev 35 Back

4   £100,000 has been offered as top prize on ITV Play, DCMS Ev 66 Back

5   Optimistic Media para 3.9, Ev 18; Ostrich Media, Ev 20; Channel 4 Ev 30; Five Ev 32; ITV Ev 35. See also Big Game TV Ev 76 Back

6   See Ostrich Media and Optimistic Media Q 98 Back

7   ITV Play channel; ITV Ev 36 Back

8   ITV Ev 36 Back

9   Ofcom Ev 52, DCMS Ev 66 Back

10   Ev 33 Back

11   Ev 37 Back

12   Ev 29 Back

13   Ev 78 Back

14   Ev 21 Back

15   Ev 50 Back

16   Ev 52 Back

17   Ev 50 Back

18   Ev 95 Back

19   Ev 37 Back

20   Ev 66 Back

21   Ev 94 Back

22   Ev 103 Back

23   Ev 33 Back

24   Q 102 Back

25   Ev 53 Back

26   Ev 29 Back

27   Broadcasting Code, Rule 2.11; Ev 53 Back

28   See Ev 54 Back

29   See Ev 54 Back

30   Ofcom press release 15 December 2006; see also Ofcom/ICSTIS Ev 56. The Advertising Code is directed more towards consumer protection  Back

31   See Statement of Expectations, paragraph 1, Ev 58 Back

32   Ev 67 Back

33   Ev 54 Back

34   Mr Kidd Q 177 Back

35   Ev 55-6 Back

36   Prize Competitions and Free Draws, Issues Paper, August 2006 Back

37   Ev 69 Back

38   Ev 55 Back

39   Ev 55 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 25 January 2007