Select Committee on Regulatory Reform First Special Report


Conclusions and recommendations

Annex: Amended Standing Orders

Consideration of draft Regulatory Reform Orders

(Showing our recommended additions and deletions to the Minister's draft Standing Orders)

18.—(1) If the Regulatory Reform Committee has recommended under paragraphs (4) or (6) of Standing Order No.141 (Regulatory Reform Committee) that a draft Order laid before the House under Part 1 of the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006 should be approved the following procedures shall apply:

(a)  if the recommendation was agreed by the committee as specified in paragraph (4)(a) or (6)(a) of Standing Order No.141 (without division, the question on any subsequent motion made by a Minister of the Crown to approve the draft Order shall be put forthwith; and

(b)  if the recommendation was made as specified in paragraph (4)(b) or (6)(b) of Standing Order No.141after a division, the draft Order shall stand referred to a Delegated Legislation Committee and paragraphs (5) and (6) of Standing Order SO No 118 (Delegated Legislation Committees) shall apply to proceedings on the draft Order;

Provided, in both cases, that in respect of a draft Order subject to the super-affirmative procedure such a recommendation has been made after the expiry of the 60-day period as defined under the Act.

(c)  if the recommendation was made as specified in paragraph (4)(c) or (6)(c) of Standing Order No.141 the question on any subsequent motion made by a Minister of the Crown to approve the draft Order shall be put not later than one and a half hours after the commencement of proceedings on the motion.

Provided that in respect of a draft Order subject to the super-affirmative procedure such a recommendation has been made after the expiry of the 60-day period as defined under the Act.

(2)  If the committee has recommended under paragraphs (4) or (6) of Standing Order No.141 (Regulatory Reform Committee) that a draft Order subject to the affirmative or super-affirmative procedure be not approved, no motion to approve the draft Order shall be made unless the House has previously resolved to disagree with the committee's report:

Provided that in the case of a draft Order subject to the super-affirmative procedure such a recommendation has been made after the expiry of the 60-day period as defined under the Act.

(3)  No motion may be made to overturn a recommendation from the committee that,

(a)  in respect of a draft Order subject to affirmative or super-affirmative procedure, no further proceedings be taken on the draft Order, or

(b)  in respect of a draft Order subject to the negative procedure, that an Order in the terms of the draft Order be not made,

unless—

(a)(c)  it is made by a Minister of the Crown in the same session; and

(b)(d)  notice of the motion has been given at least 10 sitting days previously.

(4)  The questions necessary to dispose of proceedings on a motion —

(a)  to disagree with a report from the committee under paragraph (2);

(b)  to overturn a recommendation from the committee under paragraph (3); or

(c)  to do both in respect of the same draft Order

shall be put not later than three hours after their commencement; and the question on any motion thereafter made by a Minister of the Crown that the draft Order be approved shall be put forthwith.

(5)  If the committee recommends that a draft Order subject to the negative resolution procedure should not be made, any notice of a motion to overturn that recommendation shall be deemed to constitute notice of a motion under paragraph (3) (4)(a) of Standing Order No 118 (Standing Committees on Delegated Legislation).

(6)Motions to which this Order applies may be proceeded with, though opposed, until any hour.



141. (1) There shall be a select committee, called the Regulatory Reform Committee, to examine and report on—

(i) every draft Order laid before the House under sections 14 and 18 of the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006;

(ii) any Subordinate Provisions Order or draft of such an Order made or proposed to be made under sections 1 and 4 of the Regulatory Reform Act 2001 (except those not made by a Minister of the Crown);

(iii) any matter arising from its consideration of such Orders or draft Orders; and

(iviii) matters relating to regulatory reform.

(2) In the case of every draft Order referred to in paragraph (1) (i) above the committee shall consider the Minister's recommendation under section 15(1) of the Act as to the procedure which should apply to it and shall report to the House any recommendation under the Act that a different procedure should apply.

(3)  In its consideration of draft Orders under Part 1 of the Act the committee shall include in its consideration in each case whether provision in the draft Order—

(a)  appears to make an inappropriate use of delegated legislation;

(b)  is for the purpose of removing or reducing serves the purpose of removing or reducing a burden, or the overall burdens, resulting directly or indirectly for any person from any legislation (in respect of a draft Order under section 1 of the Act);

(c)  is for the purpose of securing serves the purpose of securing that regulatory functions are exercised so as to comply with the regulatory principles, as set out in section 2(3) of the Act (in respect of a draft Order under section 2 of the Act);

(d) secures would secure a policy objective which could not be satisfactorily secured by non-legislative means;

(e) has would have an effect which is proportionate to the policy objective;

(f) strikes a fair balance between the public interest and the interests of any person adversely affected by it;

(g) does not remove any necessary protection;

(h) does not prevent any person from continuing to exercise any right or freedom which that person might reasonably expect to continue to exercise;

(i) is not of constitutional significance;

(j) makes the law more accessible or more easily understood (in the case of provisions restating enactments);

(k) has been the subject of, and takes appropriate account of, adequate consultation;

(1) gives rise to an issue under such criteria for consideration of statutory instruments laid down in paragraph (1)(i) of Standing Order No 151 (Statutory Instruments (Joint Committee)) as are relevant;

(m) appears to be incompatible with any obligation resulting from membership of the European Union;

Provided that in the case of-

i) draft Orders to be made in accordance with section 20 of the Act, the criteria above which are not relevant to the provisions of the Order to be made under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 do not apply in relation to those provisions; and

ii) Subordinate Provisions Orders or drafts of such Orders, only sub-paragraph (l) applies, but in addition the committee shall so report if it comes to the opinion that the Order or draft Order should not be approved or, as the case may be, should be annulled, and may so report if it comes to the opinion that the draft of such an Order should be approved.

(4) In relation to every draft Order subject to the negative or affirmative procedure under sections 16 or 17 of the Act, the committee shall report its recommendation whether the draft Order should be made (in the case of the negative procedure) or approved (in the case of the affirmative procedure), indicating in the case of an affirmative Order whether the recommendation was agreed -

(a) without either a division or a recommendation that the Order should stand referred to a Delegated Legislation Committee;.

(b) without a division but with a recommendation that the Order should stand referred to a Delegated Legislation Committee; or

(c) after a division.

(5) In relation to every draft Order subject to the super-affirmative procedure under section 18 of the Act, the committee shall report its recommendation as to whether—

(a) the draft Order should be proceeded with unamended under section 18(3) of the Act; or

(b) a revised draft Order should be laid under section 18(7) of the Act or

(c) no statement under section 18(3) or revised draft Order under section 18(7) should be laid.

(6) In relation to every draft Order or revised draft Order subject to the super-affirmative procedure being proceeded with under section 18(3) or 18(7) of the Act, the committee shall report its recommendation whether the draft Order or revised draft Order should be approved, indicating in the case of draft Orders which it recommends should be approved whether its recommendation was agreed -

(a) without either a division or a recommendation that the Order should stand referred to a Delegated Legislation Committee;

(b) without a division but with a recommendation that the Order should stand referred to a Delegated Legislation Committee; or

(c) after a division;

and in respect of such draft Orders or revised draft Orders the committee shall consider in each case all such matters set out in paragraph (3) of this Order as are relevant and the extent to which the Minister concerned has had regard to any resolution or report of the committee or to any other representations made during the period for parliamentary consideration.

(7) It shall be an instruction to the committee considering an unrevised draft Order under paragraph (6) that it report not more than fifteen sitting days after the statement under section 18(3) is laid.

(8) In relation to every draft Order or revised draft Order, the committee shall report any recommendation under section 16(4) of the Act that the draft Order be not made, or sections 17(3), 18(5) or 18(9) of the Act that no further proceedings be taken in relation to the draft Order.

(9) The committee shall consist of fourteen members; and, unless the House otherwise Orders, each Member nominated to the committee shall continue to be a member of it for the remainder of the Parliament.

(10) The committee shall have power—

(a) to send for persons, papers and records, to sit notwithstanding any adjournment of the House, to adjourn from place to place, and to report from time to time;

(b) to appoint specialist advisers either to supply information which is not readily available or to elucidate matters of complexity within the committee's order of reference; and

(c) to appoint a sub-committee, of which the quorum shall be two, which shall have power to send for persons, papers and records, to sit notwithstanding any adjournment of the House, and to adjourn from place to place.

(11) The committee and the sub-committee shall have the assistance of the Counsel to the Speaker.

(12) The committee and the sub-committee shall have power to invite Members of the House who are not members of the committee to attend meetings at which witnesses are being examined in relation to matters within paragraphs (1) (i) and (ii) and such Members may, at the discretion of the chairman, ask questions of those witnesses; but no Member not being a member of the committee shall otherwise take part in the proceedings of the committee or sub-committee, or be counted in the quorum.

(13) It shall be an instruction to the committee that before making any report under paragraph (1)(i) of this Standing Order it shall afford to any government department concerned an opportunity of furnishing orally or in writing to it or to the sub-committee appointed by it such explanations as the department think fit.

1.  We recommend that the draft Standing Orders be amended to provide us with the power to refer Orders for debate in Delegated Standing Committees that we consider to be of sufficient legal and political significance without having to divide or contrive a division. For draft Orders that we do not approve unanimously, we recommend that our current procedures continue and that any subsequent motion made by a Minister of the Crown to approve such draft Orders should be debated for up to one and a half hours on the floor of the House.

2.  We recommend that Subordinate Provisions Orders should continue to be scrutinised in the Commons by our Committee as now and the draft Standing Orders be amended accordingly.

3.  We recommend that the wording in 141(3b and 3c) be changed from the subjective to the more objective. This amendment also has the added advantage of providing a better match with the tests set out in the Act.

4.  We envisage that we will always report within 15 days when there are no new second stage issues to consider, but for revised Orders we can only report as promptly as is reasonably possible. We recommend that the draft Standing Orders be clarified accordingly by amendment.

5.  We recommend that the Standing Order 141(13) be deleted.

6.  We recommend that the working of the LRRA 2006 be reviewed within three years and that the review include a genuine validation of any costs and benefits or Regulatory Impact Assessments that are produced in support of all draft Orders; and that the Government report its findings to Parliament.

7.  It is imperative therefore that the House and the Department of the Clerk are able to respond speedily to any significant increase in activity. In the first instance, we would expect to be able to draw on staff in the Scrutiny Unit to be seconded in relation to specific Orders or stages of them, so as to provide assistance to the regular staff advising the Committee.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 15 December 2006