Select Committee on Regulatory Reform Second Report


Annex A

Summary results of the survey of Members of Parliament on the work of the Ombudsman

Introduction

This summary sets out the results of a survey conducted jointly by the Public Administration Select Committee and the Office of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (OPHSO) during June and July 2004 into the work of the Ombudsman.

The survey was conducted as part of the Office's commitment to the creation of a modern and responsive Ombudsman service and is one component of a broad range of stakeholder research. The last survey of MPs was conducted in 1993.

Two hundred and seven MPs out of 657 surveyed returned completed forms representing a 32% response rate. This compares to 50% or 333 MPs in 1993.

MP filter

When asked whether the MP filter should be removed 134 MPs (66%) said it should. In 1993 the response was nearly half that figure at 38%.

Direct communications with complainants

Respondents were asked whether, in the absence of removal of the MP filter, they favoured direct communication between OPHSO and the complainant once the referral had been made. The results were:

-  in favour of direct communication: 35 (16%)

-  in favour of direct communication with a copy to the MP: 147 (71%)

-  against direct communication: 24 (12%)

Awareness of Ombudsman's role and jurisdiction

Seventy per cent of respondents said that they were 'very clear' or 'quite clear' about the role and jurisdiction of the Parliamentary Ombudsman, with seven per cent saying they were 'not very clear' or 'unclear'. The figures for the Health Service Ombudsman were 70% and 24% respectively.

The majority of respondents (170, 87%) used the Ombudsman's leaflets either 'regularly' or 'sometimes' more than they used her website (94, 45%) or her telephone advice line (89, 43%).

Ombudsman's work and performance

In general the Ombudsman's work is viewed positively with 179 MPs (86%) saying her Office was either 'very' or 'quite' successful. Twenty-three (11%) said her work was `not very successful'.

When asked to what extent MPs agreed with statements about impartiality, fairness, last resort, speed, value and quality, respondents provided overwhelmingly positive answers, with the exception of speed, to which their answers were more mixed.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 15 March 2007