Quadripartite Select Committee Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum from the Department for International Development

RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS FROM THE QUADRIPARTITE COMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC EXPORT CONTROLS

 (a)   French interpretation of Criterion 8

  ****

 (b)   Why do we use the IDA list? Why is a country such as Morocco not on the list?

  The list of countries eligible for IDA loans is the most authoritative, comprehensive, and up-to-date list of the world's poorest countries. Eligibility is based on low income (low GNI per capita), so IDA countries have the least available resources and the greatest need to use those scarce resources in a productive way. The list is produced by the World Bank, and is updated annually. It now includes 82 countries (Montenegro is the 82nd).

  By contrast, the UN's list of Least Development Countries (LDCs) covers 50 countries and is only updated every three years. It excludes, for example, India and Pakistan. It is therefore of less relevance to exporters like the UK.

  In 2005, Morocco's GNI per capita ($1,059) was slightly higher than that of Guyana ($1,000). As the cut-off point for eligibility for IDA loans is $1,025, Morocco is not on the IDA list. In the specific case of Morocco we feel that factors causing concern are subject to scrutiny under other criteria: Morocco's relatively high level of military spending and its occupation of Western Sahara would be taken into account under criteria 3 (internal tensions) and 4 (regional peace and stability).

 (c)   Bradford University study

  The Centre for International Co-operation and Security (CICS) at Bradford University prepared a paper for DFID entitled, "The Impact of Arms Transfers on Poverty and Development". The paper can be found at: http://www.bradford.ac.uk/acad/cics/publications/AVPI/transfers/

  The research was conducted through the Armed Violence and Poverty Initiative (AVPI), which was established by DFID using funds from the Small Arms Strategy of the Global Conflict Prevention Pool. The AVPI gathered evidence on the impact of arms transfers and armed violence on poverty and other development indicators. We are now using this research, and similar work from elsewhere, to develop programming guidance for donors in small arms control and armed violence reduction. We aim to have this guidance adopted by OECD member states through agreement by its Development Assistance Committee (DAC) in 2008.

 (d)   Transparency in the defence sector

  As discussed we will keep the Committee informed about the progress of this work. At present, we are trying to determine whether such an initiative is feasible and whether it might have a significant impact on development.

 (e)   Refusals under other criteria

  ****

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE CRITERION 8 METHODOLOGY

  All the information used in the methodology was updated at the end of 2006.

  Paragraph 4:

  ****

  Paragraphs 7, 9 and 13:

  ****

March 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 7 August 2007