Quadripartite Select Committee Written Evidence


Further memorandum from the Department of Trade and Industry

  On 20 February, 2007, I provided an interim response to your letter of 7 February. In your original letter you requested details of the methodology that the Department for International Development uses to assess whether applications for export licences meet Criterion 8 of the EU Code on Arms Exports and a working example of its application, and also raised a number of questions relating to the apparent disparity between refusals on Criterion 8 grounds made by France and the UK.

  I understand that the methodology used by DFID to assess export licence applications under Criterion 8 was passed to you on 1st March 2007, and that DFID have also provided you with an explanation of the disparity in the number of refusals between the UK and the French. However, I am now able to answer your more detailed questions relating to the French Criterion 8 refusals. I apologise for the delay in reaching this stage.

  Your first request was for details of the French refusals and the reasoning behind them. My officials have been in contact with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office concerning the release of this information. The advice that we have received is that this information has been provided by other Governments to the UK in confidence under the relevant regime, and that it therefore cannot be released by the UK Government to any third parties. However, I hope that the more general information on procedures in France recently provided by DFID may have helped to clarify these matters, in principle at least.

  Your second question was whether the UK or any other Government had undercut these refusals by France. I should start by explaining that many refusals never raise an issue of undercut. It is necessary for the UK to consider that issue only if a UK exporter applies, subsequent to a refusal by another regime member, to export goods or technology which are essentially identical to those which were the subject of the refusal. My officials have checked the records thoroughly for the relevant time periods and confirm that no such applications were lodged by UK exporters; so in practice, the issue has never arisen from a UK perspective and I can confirm that the UK has not undercut any of the French Criterion 8 refusals.

  Consultations concerning potential undercuts are between the state that has refused and the country of intended export. The UK would not be advised of any of these consultations unless it were directly involved, and so does not hold the information that you request concerning undercuts by other countries.

April 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 7 August 2007