Select Committee on Defence Written Evidence


Memorandum from the Society of British Aerospace Companies (SBAC)

  1.  SBAC welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the House of Commons Defence Committee on the implementation of the Defence Industrial Strategy (DIS).

  2.  Over the 11 months since the DIS was published the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has maintained a fast pace in launching initiatives under its two year implementation programme. The determination of Lord Drayson and his senior level team to drive this change programme forward continues to impress, and SBAC have remained supportive of the effort to achieve the DIS goals. MoD has also continued to talk to industry extensively, through the National Defence Industries Council and a range of other channels, including direct meetings with SBAC.

  3.  In the first half of the year SBAC was principally concerned to understand how MoD would go about the implementation process and what effect this would have on its relationships with industry. As the year has progressed MoD has taken a range of significant steps on the implementation path. The key developments have been:

    —  The publication of the Enabling Acquisition Change Report and launch of the Enabling Acquisition Change Programme.

    —  The accompanying announcement that the Defence Procurement Agency and Defence Logistics Organisation would be merged.

    —  The appointment of Amyas Morse, from outside MoD, to take up the new post of Commercial Director for MoD.

    —  The conclusion of the first long-term partnering agreement with industry, on rotorcraft with Agusta Westland.

    —  The publication of the Defence Technology Strategy.

  4.  These steps are the highlights of a broader picture of change, much of which has been enabling or incremental in nature. For example, Lord Drayson announced the Team Complex Weapons at the Farnborough Airshow in July, which presages a long-term partnering agreement in the guided weapons sector; this is a very positive step forward with MoD and Industry working in partnership to achieve the agreement over the coming months. Another example is the good progress on the Armoured Fighting Vehicle Partnering agreement with BAE Systems.

  5.  Given the scale of the change programme being undertaken at MoD, it is inevitably still early to make considered judgments about the output of the reforms launched by the DIS. A great deal more work remains to be done and a coherent picture of a changed approach has yet to emerge. Industry still expresses concern about different messages coming from different parts of MoD. But industry also accepts that it must play a part in delivering the DIS, and intensive discussions continue in many areas, including for example a range of sectoral negotiations (eg in the naval industry sector), the SBAC's own initiative on supply chain excellence (SC21) and the support signalled by industry on the Defence Values for Acquisition. SBAC believes it is essential that the DIS succeeds if the Armed Forces are to be supported effectively in the future, and that the UK industrial base is to remain important in providing that support and bringing a significant benefit to the UK economy.

  6.  SBAC therefore remains keen to support the implementation of DIS. In doing so, it believes a number of key issues must be resolved if the implementation programme is to deliver the changes the DIS, and now the Defence Technology Strategy (DTS), propose. These are as follows:

6a  Impact of the Comprehensive Spending Review

  There is concern in industry as to whether the resources will be made available in the Comprehensive Spending Review to enable the MoD to sustain its overall programme and, in particular, to sustain sufficient research, technology demonstration and procurement spending to support the Armed Forces of the future. With the strategy in place and implementation underway, it is absolutely crucial that sufficient funds are made available to the department to ensure that the value of the DIS is fully realised. Not least because this is a time when there are understandable pressures on the department to make funds available to operations. In the areas of research and technology, there is a need for clearer benchmarks that identify the level of resources that are needed.

6b  Promoting more investment in new technology

  Despite the publication of the Defence Technology Strategy (DTS), there still appears to be a gap in understanding between Government and industry as to the incentives needed to achieve greater industry investment in support of defence technology programmes. The DTS does not give a picture which is sufficiently complete for industry to make investment decisions. Greater transparency on how research and technology investment will flow through to procurement and how Intellectual Property Rights will be protected are areas where greater clarity is needed. The "National Aerospace Technology Strategy" cuts across both civil and defence aerospace investment. However, investment in the strategy has been largely sourced from the DTI research technology programme. There is an opportunity for MoD to align its investment along the lines of this already agreed strategy.

6c  Innovation

  Innovation and problem-solving for our hard-pressed Armed Forces is a vital issue. Both government and industry want to promote greater innovation in the supply chain, and to encourage the involvement of SMEs, especially from outside the defence sector. The best way to achieve this end remains under discussion; SBAC supports the willingness of MoD to consider radical measures if a genuine change of culture is to be achieved, but some skill will be needed to strike the right balance.

6d  Partnering

  The MoD is clearly still working on its models for long-term partnering agreements and through-life capability planning. Industry wants to contribute constructively to that process. These agreements will affect the industry as a whole, not just the partners involved. It is therefore critical that the principles underpinning the agreements should be transparent to all. The recent MoD publication "Capability Management Guiding Principles" is an excellent example of the proactive work that MoD has been doing, where it has actively consulted and involved industry. A similar paper giving Guiding Principles for Partnering could be a good way to define generalised model(s) for partnering. Such a "Blueprint" would be helpful in showing what partnering relationships should look like and might also help speed up the MoD's internal processes for addressing sectoral partnering arrangements.

6e  Supply chain relationships

  If DIS is to succeed it will also be important to gain the confidence of the whole supply chain. The SBAC's 21 Century Supply Chain (SC21) initiative, which aims to achieve a modernised UK supply chain, that encourages innovation pull through, better relationships and better through-life capability management has an important role to play in contributing to the MoD's aims. Key to success in this area will be to establish clear measures of success and failure that both industry and MOD can sign up to and a robust mechanism for dealing with problems in an effective but flexible manner.

6f  The international dimension

  The DIS has considerable implications for UK co-operation on acquisition with key partners, especially the USA and major European countries. At this stage the effect of the DIS on these relationships remains one of the least well articulated aspects of the DIS and one on which engagement between Government and industry is relatively limited.

6g  The DIS vision

  The key question for industry is what MoD will look like in 10 years time as a result of implementing DIS. Industry needs to have sight of MoD's vision, as the "customer" of where it is going and how it sees the future state of the UK defence industrial base through the DIS, to enable it to meet the changes and challenges of DIS and ensure that it fulfils the future needs and requirements of the armed services. The relationship between defence and security is another interesting aspect looking forward, reinforcing the need to understand better the interaction between civil and defence technology development. Greater exposure to government's thinking would therefore be welcome.

  7.  SBAC is committed to engage with MoD, other Government Departments and the rest of industry to making progress towards a coherent and comprehensive overall implementation of the DIS during 2007. In the meantime we would welcome a further contribution from the Committee to help create the right climate for a productive debate and an active resolution to the difficult issues outlined in this Memorandum.

1 December 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 15 February 2007