Select Committee on Defence First Report


1  Introduction

1. Defence equipment procurement accounts for a major part of defence spending. The Defence Committee visited the Defence Procurement Agency (DPA) in January 2006 and were told that the DPA managed some 500 projects and that the value of the forward programme was £75 billion. In 2005-06, some £5.9 billion was spent on equipment procurement.[1] Following the pattern established by our predecessors, we have decided to undertake an annual broad defence equipment inquiry. Our inquiry this year examined the performance of the DPA, and the progress on several equipment programmes which our predecessors had monitored:

  • Astute submarine
  • Future Carrier
  • Joint Combat Aircraft (Joint Strike Fighter)
  • Chinook Mk 3 helicopter

2. The MoD has four categories of defence equipment:

  • Category A—procurement cost above £400 million
  • Category B—procurement cost of £100 million to £400 million
  • Category C—procurement cost of £20 million to £100 million
  • Category D—procurement cost of under £20 million[2]

Parliamentary scrutiny of defence procurement projects has generally focused on the major defence projects, given their financial size and impact on the defence budget, and their importance to the armed forces. We examined two key defence projects—the Future Carrier and the Joint Strike Fighter programmes—in late 2005[3] and our predecessors undertook regular inquiries into the progress of major equipment projects and the performance of the DPA in managing these. The National Audit Office (NAO) produces an annual report on the progress of the top 20 major defence projects. While the procurement of smaller-size equipment projects, particularly those procured as Urgent Operational Requirements (UORs), have been examined as part of inquiries into operations, scrutiny of smaller-size defence equipment projects has, to date, been limited.

3. This year we decided to examine four smaller-scale defence equipment projects as part of our inquiry:

  • General Service Respirator
  • ASUW Littoral Defensive Anti Surface Warfare
  • Maritime Composite Training System Phase 1
  • Thermal Sighting System for the Self Propelled High Velocity Missile system

4. During our inquiry, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) announced the merger of the DPA and the Defence Logistics Organisation (DLO). We examined the aims of the merger and the progress being made.

5. In undertaking our inquiry, we took oral evidence on 27 June 2006 from three directors from the DPA: Mr Jonathan Lyle, Operations Director, Air and Weapon Systems; Dr Andrew Tyler, Director, Land and Maritime; Dr Iain Watson, Operations Director for Information Superiority; and Lieutenant General Andrew Figgures, Deputy Chief of Staff, (Equipment Capability), Ministry of Defence.[4] On 10 October 2006, we took evidence from Sir Peter Spencer KCB, Chief of Defence Procurement (CDP), DPA.[5] We received a range of written evidence from the MoD and others.[6]

6. We are grateful to all those who contributed to our inquiry including our specialist advisers.


1   Defence Procurement Agency, Annual Report and Accounts 2005-06, HC (2005-06) 1164, p 21 Back

2   Ev 33 Back

3   Defence Committee, Second Report of Session 2005-06, Future Carrier and Joint Combat Aircraft Programmes, HC 554 Back

4   Ev 1-14 Back

5   Ev 15-32 Back

6   Ev 33-56 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 8 December 2006