Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES)

  1.    Tim Byles, Martin Lipson and I gave evidence to the Education and Skills Select Committee on 6 December 2006. There are two issues on which the Committee asked me to write with further information.

IMPACT OF THE ACTION PLAN ON SUSTAINABLE PROCUREMENT

  2.  Mr David Chaytor MP asked about the impact of the "action plan on sustainable procurement" on guidelines over the range of sustainability issues for schools. Our understanding is that this is a reference to the recommendations set out in the report to Government (June 2006) of the Sustainable Procurement Task Force: Procuring the Future. The Task Force is an independent body, led by Sir Neville Simms, and the report includes a range of recommendations for central Government and the wider public sector, including recommendation (A5.4)—Treasury and DfES must work with Building Schools for the Future programme to ensure that it is meeting high sustainability standards and to learn lessons for other capital projects.

  3.  The Government is preparing a formal response to the Task Force report and recommendations, which will include its own Sustainable Procurement Action Plan. The response will be published shortly. Until then, though there is no formal sustainable procurement action plan for government departments, all departments (including DfES and HM Treasury) continue to work on a range of measures to improve sustainable procurement throughout the public sector, including Building Schools for the Future.

BREEAM SCHOOLS

  4.  Mr Gordon Marsden MP asked for details of options for using BREEAM Schools to deliver carbon reductions in schools. BREEAM Schools was developed specifically for schools in 2005 and provides a tool which sets robust, achievable and cost-effective environmental targets for new buildings and refurbishment projects. Its development was guided by a sector advisory group comprising designers, local authority representatives, non-government organisations and DfES officials.

  5.  The Department considers that a BREEAM for Schools rating of "very good" is a challenging but achievable target within existing resources. DfES has therefore set as a condition of government funding, "very good" as the minimum standard. All new schools will meet this, compared with 17% of government buildings which met their target BREEAM rating during 2005 as reported in "Procuring the Future".

  6.  However, we recognise that there is more to do if schools are to achieve carbon neutrality and we are investigating a range of options such as:

    —  Raising the BREEAM Schools threshold;

    —  Mandating within BREEAM Schools by giving, for example, greater emphasis to targets relating to energy use; and

    —  Introducing a separate scheme which focuses on energy use.

  7.  There are some significant barriers to raising the BREEAM Schools hurdle. It has not been established with certainty that a BREEAM Schools rating of "excellent" is technically possible or value for money for all school buildings. In order to gain a better understanding of the challenges presented by raising the target to "excellent", we are funding three demonstration sustainability projects. These schools have committed to achieve a BREEAM Schools rating of "excellent", and will include further measures to improve sustainability. Two of the schools are aiming to be "carbon neutral" with respect to energy use.

  8.  In addition to raising the target BREEAM Schools rating, we also have the option to introduce complementary standards on specific issues such as energy use/carbon emissions. In support of this approach we have commissioned a team of designers to research the options for reducing carbon emissions for a sample of schools types in different locations. This will examine the technical possibilities for reducing school carbon emissions by varying amounts, together with associated costs and benefits.

  9.  These are significant issue for Ministers to consider. Ministers expect to be able to give a clear lead on these matters when the Comprehensive Spending Review Capital programmes are announced in late 2007.

Sally Brooks, Divisional Manager, Schools Capital (Policy and Delivery)

January 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 9 August 2007