Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 260-263)

MS JESSICA GOLD, MS RAJI HUNJAN, MR TOM WYLIE AND MR JULES MASON

15 MAY 2006

  Q260  Mr Marsden: Through you, Chairman, I think Tom was nodding; do you want to add something?

  Mr Wylie: I think colleagues have said it. I think it is the three. I have taught it myself, I have taught history on the British constitution, as it was then called. You do need the specific elements so that you can help people to be clear where the hand-holds are, a bit like the Bullock Report on English, many years ago, where every teacher is a citizenship teacher, so you do want to see its connections and, I would say, the Whig view of history, even the poetry of John Clare, etc., can we see where it connects in other subjects. If it is not then lived out in what they experience in the school, then the teaching will take it only so far, if they do not feel respected and able to participate to the different levels of their interests and ability in the school itself then people will disregard the taught curriculum, because that is not the message they are getting from the hidden curriculum.

  Q261  Chairman: We are coming to the end of this session. Tom has now got a gold star for mentioning John Clare in evidence, but, you three, you are going to have this feeling of discontent when you leave this Committee, because as soon as you get out of this room you are going to say to yourself "I wish I'd told that lot x, or y." You have got a minute to do it. I will start with Jules. We have missed the point, have we; what have we missed that we should be alert to? What else should we be looking at?

  Mr Mason: I do not think there is anything missed. I would just re-emphasise, which bears upon Tom's last point, that citizenship needs to be lived. I think, from our perspective, it being seen as vocational, life skills, so that then beyond compulsory and beyond post-16 education, when they become real citizens, depending on your perspective, they can contribute to society. I think that is what citizenship education is about.

  Q262  Chairman: You do not have citizenship in universities, do you?

  Mr Mason: No, but of lifelong learning everyone is a part.

  Q263  Chairman: Perhaps we should have?

  Ms Hunjan: I think I would like to see more decision-makers and policy-makers involved in supporting the citizenship curriculum and making it more real through engaging young people in consultation, through opening up our institutions in more accessible ways for young people to be involved in them and actively to engage with young people and see them as citizens now, not citizens of the future. I would like to see the Education Unit of Parliament supporting schools more, by making it easier for them to access the information and understand what is going on here.

  Ms Gold: We think that every school needs to be supported in the process of establishing an effective, bottom-up student participation infrastructure, an infrastructure that all young people now have to feed into, access and have a voice through, as opposed to it being just an elite couple of students who meet in the head's office. It is a bottom-up structure, through form councils, through class councils, and schools should have a specific part of their budget which every year can be spent on developing young people's skills in participation and leadership.

  Mr Wylie: Encourage schools to have a set of standards which cover both the taught curriculum and the hidden curriculum of the school as an institution, and connect both of those to the real world and not simply the institution.

  Chairman: Thank you very much for evidence. We have enjoyed it and it has been a very lively session. Thank you very, very much.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 8 March 2007