Select Committee on Education and Skills Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the City and Guilds of London Institute

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  The evidence presented is from the City & Guilds of London Institute and explains the Higher Education Qualifications it awards. Their purpose in providing parallel and linked qualifications largely on a part time basis to traditional University delivered qualifications. It raises the key issues of the funding for these qualifications and that that this needs to be made much more easily accessible and assured.

1.1  FACTUAL INFORMATION

  City & Guilds of London Institute are keen to respond to this House of Commons Education and Skills Committee Inquiry into Higher Education as we believe that the work based model of Higher Level Qualifications that we have developed provides parallel pathways to connect with the University/Higher Education system as well as potentially adding value to the University Higher Education system; but these pathways do require proper funding and recognition for them to be both successful and sustainable.

  1.2  Over the past five years City & Guilds have developed a range of Higher Professional Diploma qualifications focussed on Level 4 of the National Qualifications Framework—equivalent to the first year of a degree. These are described in Appendix 1.[49] These qualifications provide a developmental pathway for the 110,000 City & Guilds candidates who achieve a Level 3 qualification each year and also give them potential to move onto the second year/stage of a Foundation Degree.

  They are aimed principally at part time in work candidates but can be run as full time programmes so long as significant work experience is provided. This is because the HPDs are structured as 120 credit qualifications across a significant range of vocational subject areas illustrated in Appendix 2.

  1.3  The key issue for increasing the take up of these qualifications is that of a clearly defined source of funding.

  They have been accredited by QCA which means that they are fundable but still come within the "non-prescribed HE" area and so funding is not assured for centres. There are promises in the FE White Paper that such defined sources will be forthcoming and it is vitally important that this occurs soon. We would be keen for the Committee to support and endorse this development. It would also greatly aid the Leitch Report's emphasis on the need for greater acquisition of higher level skills if the UK is to develop its competitive edge worldwide in the next 15 years.

  1.4  What these qualifications also provide is a way of giving recognition to the first year of Vocational Foundation Degrees and Degrees. This model is explored in Appendix 3 (article for Foundation Degree Forward Magazine). The attraction of giving recognition to students on HE programmes at Level 4 is likely to increase as tuition fees kick into the HE system and students and parents increasingly ask what outcomes they are achieving from the programmes they are now having a financial, consumer interest in and "shopper" focus.

  1.5  The Master Professional Diplomas have been developed to provide a Masters Level Qualification that again can be achieved part time and whilst at work and could equate to 90 -120M credits (half or two thirds of a Masters programme). The same issues of assured funding to encourage and increase take up also apply to these QCA accredited qualifications. Again they can be a valuable qualification in their own right or a pathway to a Master's Degree.

  1.6  As well as these focused qualifications we also have Senior Awards which derive from the Royal Charter that City & Guilds has held since 1900. These provide a mechanism for gaining recognition of professional development through the award of Licentiateship, Graduateship and Membership—LCGI, GCGI, MCGI, designatory letters. A number of Universities (Appendix 4) use these to give added value recognition to undergraduates completing work experience as part of their programmes. There are also a variety of other organisations that use these programmes to give higher level recognition to staff of softer skills and in-house training at a variety of levels (Appendix 5).

  1.7  As well as this recognition process through Delegated Authorities, City & Guilds has systems to enable individual candidates to put themselves forward for recognition through completion of a portfolio or a project for which advisers and assessors can be provided directly to the candidates (see Appendix 6 for information on Senior Awards and Appendix 7 for Delegated Authority information.

  1.8  Sometimes organisations pay for staff to acquire this recognition, occasionally there are sources of funding as in the armed forces that individuals can use. However, some assured source of funding to encourage take up of these Continuous Professional Development recognition routes would enable take up, participation and engagement.

  1.9  As well as these broad offerings covering most Sectors and specialisms of higher level qualifications and recognition, we do run a specialist pathway in Engineering in conjunction with EC/UK—the Engineering Council Exams (see Appendix 8, please note this is only available in hard copy). These provide an alternative part-time route to gaining Engineering Technician, Incorporated Engineer and Chartered Member status with British and other country Engineering Institutions by providing an examinable pathway that can be engaged in part-time and parallels the established undergraduate/postgraduate Degree pathways. Again these exams have been accredited by QCA as fundable but assured funding is needed if Colleges are to run courses leading to these qualifications.

2.1  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION

  We believe we have developed a model of Higher Education progression for those largely in work which can connect with and dovetail to traditional university delivered HE qualifications. The key requirement for greater involvement by individuals and employers is clearly designated and easily accessed funding. It is in this area that we believe the Committee needs to focus some important attention and make key recommendations to support growth of the part time, in work, HE provision that City and Guilds has now successfully developed.

December 2006







49   Appendices are not printed. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 9 August 2007