Confed Written Submission to The Education and Skills Select Committee on 14-19 Specialised Diplomas

 

1.0 Introduction

1.1 The Confederation of children's services managers - Confed - is the professional association representing Directors and Managers of Education and Children's Services in local authorities in England and Wales. Initially established as the Association of Directors and Secretaries for Education in 1906, the Association evolved over time into the broader based Society of Education Officers. Confed was officially launched in July 2002 marking the beginning of the Association's expansion into the broader children's services agenda. Confed is an umbrella body bringing together the Society of Education Officers (SEO), the Association of Directors of Education and Children's Services, (ADECS, formerly the Association of Chief Education Officers), the National Association of Senior School Improvement Professionals (NASSIPs, formerly the Society of Chief Inspectors and Advisers) and the Association of Local Authority Advisory Officers for Multi-cultural Education (ALAOME).

 

1.2 The prime purpose of Confed is to contribute to the raising and maintaining of high quality standards in local authority education and children's services. As a Learned Society, Confed aims to influence national developments in the provision of education and children's services and within the profession to share good practice among local authorities and promote the interests of staff working in the leadership and management of education and children's services. Confed is committed to a stakeholder model of a publicly accountable system which delivers high quality, appropriately-targeted services to children, young people and their families and carers, where all providers work together collaboratively for the good of every child and young person.

 

1.3As the professional voice of Directors of Children's Services, Confed would wish to work with all partners to ensure that the emerging 14-19 agenda is both deliverable and delivered to our young people. It is Local Authorities who now have the responsibility to establish and develop effective local 14-19 Partnerships. Confed members have a key role in the development and strategic leadership of the delivery of the Diploma at a local level.

 

1.4 The implementation of policy into practice and providing feedback is the particular experience, role and expertise of Confed's professional membership and Confed has considerable collective knowledge and understanding of how to deliver through partnership working. Confed also has a regional membership structure across England and is currently re-organising with ADSS to develop a single professional voice of Children Services leaders in England.

 

2.0 Confed's recommendations

There are 3 main recommendations that Confed would wish to put forward for consideration:

 

2.1 That a new Joint Protocol be agreed, under the leadership of the Diploma Champions that sets out the vision, values and modus operandi of all key stakeholders and that clarifies roles and responsibilities.

 

2.2 That 9 Regional Diploma Teams be established that are multi-agency and integrate with the existing regional infrastructure.

 

2.3 That National Demonstration Projects for each line of learning that become regional hubs for Diploma development and delivery and sit within new regional Diploma strategic management arrangements based on Government Offices

 

3.0 Design and Development of Diplomas

We need a Protocol to engage all partners and stakeholders, including young people, that will map the

· Design

· Development

· Delivery

 

of the diplomas and will clearly articulate the

· Aims

· Ambitions

· Roles

· Responsibilities

·

of all the players.

 

3.1 The shared vision and common understanding that comes from this will establish:

· The Purpose of The Diploma

· Shared values , principles and strategy

· How the Diploma fits into and complements the 14-19 Framework and curriculum

· How the Diploma will innovate & motivate

· Delivery of the knowledge, understanding and skills that will have currency for young people in the world of work & how they will be assessed and graded

· The experiential nature of the curriculum

· Employer and key stakeholder engagement at a regional level

· Regional support and strategic management

· Testing, trailing, research and development to inform Diploma delivery

· Clear roles and responsibilities at both national and regional levels

 

4.0 Strategic Management

An all-partner National Steering Group should be established to ensure that the implementation of the Protocol is followed.

 

4.1 A National Steering Group

National Progression Demonstration Projects (see below) are principally concerned with development and delivery of the Diploma. It would be appropriate for the National Steering Group to be chaired by the QCA. The purpose of the steering group would be to co-ordinate and have strategic leadership of the National Demonstration Projects and bring together key national strategic leaders in the Development of the Diploma and in particular would have strong Employer membership and involvement to ensure highly successful diploma provision and credibility for each of the Phase 1 Lines of Learning.

 

4.2 The roles and responsibilities of the National Steering Group

These would include:

 

· Determining terms of reference for the Demonstration Projects to develop scale, structure, and employer leadership

· Scoping, commissioning and implementing a Project Plan

· Inviting expressions of interest for NDP status

· Determining criteria and deciding choice of projects to include geographic spread

· Responsible for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Projects and producing an Annual Progress Review of the Demonstration Projects.

· Giving strategic leadership to the development of the NDPs.

· Quality Control of the work of NDPs

· To disseminate effective practice for future diploma development

· Commissioning and overseeing regional strategic management support for local management and implementation of the projects

· Monitoring the implementation of the project plan and receiving progress reports

 

4.3 National Steering Group Membership

The membership of the National Steering Group would carry out the Governance role and its membership should include as a minimum:

 

· Phase 1 DDP Leads and /or SSDA representatives

· DfES representative

· QCA

· A Regional Steering Group Representative for each Phase 1 line of learning National Demonstration project

· 2 HEI Representatives

· 2 Awarding Body Representatives

· 2 Confed/ADCS representatives

 

This would give a membership of around 20 and it is envisaged that the National Steering Group would need to meet at least 3 times a year and possibly more intensively at the development stage.

 

5.0 Diploma National Demonstration Projects

5.1 A programme of National Demonstration Projects should be established that will secure high-level national credibility for each Line of Learning. It will ensure that students, parents, employers and HE have full confidence in the Diploma as a genuine, robust and clear pathway for progression through secondary, further and higher education to employment according to their appropriate entry point into the world of work. The National Demonstration Projects will demonstrate, from first draft to delivery, that Diplomas are high quality, robust and genuinely innovative for learners with new opportunities for progression that meet the needs of employers, Higher Education and young people.

 

5.2 The 5 Projects, one for each Phase I line of learning, will be nationally led. They will demonstrate the benefits of effective employer engagement and leadership and give a practical explanation of how each line of learning will work This will teach and inform training providers, schools, colleges employers, learners and Higher Education how an individual line of learning can be effectively delivered. They will show -case innovative curriculum practice and establish new approaches for applied, experiential learning, PLTS and Functional Skills, in the context of an individual line of learning. They will also provide the opportunity for national testing, trialling and structured external evaluation of qualification development and test the implementation of each individual line of learning.

 

5.3 The NDPs will be Centres of Excellence for staff development, effective practice, stakeholder engagement, and act as regional hubs for the national rollout and promotion of the Diploma as well as being a national exemplar reference point for their individual line of learning.

 

5.4 There may be some national organisations including the Offender Management Services, Young Offenders Institutions and The Armed Forces where it might be appropriate to consider separate demonstration projects to reflect their unique situation.

 

5.5 There would be the opportunity to link national and local employer Diploma champions to each National Demonstration Project who could form an Ambassadors Network to promote the Diploma so that the National Demonstration Projects are shown to be and are in practice employer-led.

 

5.6 By 2008 there would be 5 National Progression Demonstration Projects (one for each Phase 1 Line of Learning) located in different parts of the country in different kinds of communities developed to reflect the context of the regional economy and the regional economic strategy. In Phase 1 it would be appropriate for innovative local centres and consortia to be designated as National Demonstration Projects that would bring together the Sector Skills Councils, local centres, their partnerships, national and local employers, awarding bodies and higher education. They would be compatible with the Diploma Gateway process and would be complementary to the proposed Pathfinder projects. The selection of designated NDP's would mirror the Diploma Gateway process in terms of meeting robust selection criteria

 

5.7 It would be possible in Phase 2 to identify further National Demonstration Projects for each new line of learning in such a way as to eventually ensure geographical coverage for each of the 9 Government Office Regions. Consideration could be given to establishing at least one National Progression Demonstration Project for each Line of Learning in each Region as the Diploma is developed.

 

5.8 A crucial aspect of a National Demonstration Project will be the alignment of all delivery partners to establish clear, genuine and robust pathways for young people and for these to be communicated to young people and their parents. Therefore a co-ordinated local stakeholder engagement strategy will be a prerequisite of designation as a National Demonstration Project as part of the national 14-19 Communication strategy.

 

5.9 The NDPs will provide the opportunity to secure national strategic management, structured implementation, and feedback and learning on a range of Diploma development and delivery issues. These would include:

 

· Employer Engagement and Leadership

· Communication with teachers, learners and parents

· Identify effective ways of delivering the Diploma

· Making collaborative consortia work

· Strategic management and planning

· Impartial IAG and structured access for Young People

· Workforce Development & training

· Funding mechanisms and costs

· Grading and Assessment

· Timetabling & transport

· KS3/4 Curriculum models & compatibility issues

· Progression across 14-19 framework including pathways to Apprenticeships & employment

· Buildings and specialist facilities

· Accountability, reporting, roles and responsibilities

· Delivery of PLTS, Functional Skills & high quality work experience

· Experiential learning and teaching strategies

 

6.0 The Regional Approach.

Many of the key stakeholders for the Diploma have a regional organisational structure e.g. Government Offices, LSC, Sector Skills Councils, Employer Organisations, SSAT, Confed/ADCS and there are also a number of existing regional partnerships that have an interest in this agenda as well school, college, HE and training provider networks. There is also regional support for the 14-19 agenda through EBLOs and Connexions arrangements as well as the local 14-19 Partnerships which LAs have the responsibility for establishing and developing.

 

6.1 A Regional Diploma Team is urgently needed, established through the 9 Government Offices in England who are ideally placed to, co-ordinate and align all field force support and partnership work on the 14-19 Agenda and are already giving local leadership to the 14-19 Progress Checks and the Diploma Gateway Processes. Each Regional Diploma Team should include any organisation or field force that is involved in Diploma support and delivery as set out above. At the same time there is the opportunity to integrate these developments with the work of the RDAs and Regional Skills Partnerships, who bring together the major regional stakeholders including Sector Skills Councils in addressing skills development in the context of the Regional Economic Strategy.

 

6.2 Regional Steering Groups

It is envisaged that there will be a geographical spread of National Demonstration Projects and that a Regional Steering Group could oversee them at a local level to exercise local Governance. This would integrate with existing LSC regional partnership arrangements and could be an additional function of an already existing group or be newly created for this purpose according to local needs. It would be crucial that this is seen to be employer-led and again there will be different local networks that would be appropriate in the context of local LSC arrangements.

 

6.3 Regional Steering Groups-Roles & Responsibilities

These would include:

 

· Engaging all local key stakeholders particularly employers

· Provide additional support for delivery of agreed Demonstration Projects

· Management of NDP support budget

· Management of Tests , trials and drawing lessons from project

· Drawing up NDP in consultation with local partners

· Project management of the Demonstration Project Plan for their NDP

· Approval ,monitoring and evaluation of their NDP

· Regular accountability to the National Steering Group

· Liaison with the National Demonstration Project Steering Group

· Oversight of strategic support for all Diploma development in the Region

· Promotion and marketing of the Diploma in their region

· Developing a regional communication strategy for dissemination

· Developing regional infrastructure support for Diploma rollout

 

6.4 Regional Steering Group Membership would include:

 

· Employer Chair

· Local Sector Skills representative

· Regional Skills Partnership

· RDA

· Government Office DfES 14-19 lead

· HEI

· LSC

· QCA

· Local 14-19 Partnership co-ordinator and key providers

· Awarding Body Representative

· Local Centre Co-ordinator

 

7.0 Key outcomes

7.1 A success story, which demonstrates that the new qualification can genuinely meet the needs of employers and HEIs by developing technically competent and personally proficient young people, who might not otherwise have chosen that field of employment, attracted by an applied learning course.

 

7.2 The development of a national test-bed framework for independent evaluation, testing and structured trials during the development of the Diploma prior and subsequent to the launch of Phase 1 in 2008.

 

7.3 A practical foundation for the development of national guidance for local centres and providers based on a well-designed research and development framework established within the National Demonstration Projects.

 

7.4 Involvement of National bodies in local development through the leadership of Sector Skills Councils /DDP's, Dfes, QCA.

 

7.5 Creating synergy between national and regional organisations such as LSC, Aim Higher and Regional Skills Partnerships, RDAs and Specialist Schools and Academies.

 

7.6 Development of Centres of Excellence to support on-going local diploma rollout, and work-force development.

 

7.7 Demonstrating how effective pathways will work from age 14 through to Higher Education and employment.

 

7.8 Demonstrate that The Diploma is as good as A levels as a pathway to Higher Education and employment.

 

7.9 National communication and sharing of effective practice

 

7.10Co-ordination of national, regional and local stakeholder involvement to deliver a high quality hub and spoke framework

 

7.11 Support for the delivery of the Work Experience component

 

7.12 Limited in scale so that it can be assured of success, capable of replication and carefully and widely marketed.

 

7.13 Delivering confidence and credibility for the Diploma demonstrating the benefits of local employer engagement.