Select Committee on Environmental Audit Fourth Report


Pre-Budget 2006: Shifting the burden of taxation


58. Almost a decade ago, in July 1997, the Treasury issued a "Statement of Intent on Environmental Taxation", setting out the Government's aim:

    to reform the tax system to increase incentives to reduce environmental damage. That will shift the burden of tax from 'goods' to 'bads'; encourage innovation in meeting higher environmental standards; and deliver a more dynamic economy and a cleaner environment, to the benefit of everyone.[76]

In our understanding the Government was giving in this Statement a clear commitment to alter the balance of tax revenue, increasing the proportion of revenues gained from taxing environmentally destructive activities, while decreasing the proportion gained from taxing things such as personal income, corporate profits, and employment (eg, National Insurance). Following this Statement, the Treasury introduced a number of promising measures, including the Climate Change Levy and the Aggregates Levy. However, since 1999 the Government's overall impact on shifting the burden has gone into reverse, with latest figures showing the proportion of tax revenues gained from environmental taxes has gone down once more, and is now at its lowest for over a decade.

59. As the data on environmental taxes published by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) show (Figure 6), Government revenue from environmental taxes rose significantly between 1994 and 1999, largely thanks to the fuel duty escalator, before declining again, following its abolition. Since 1999, environmental taxes as a percentage of total taxes have fallen almost year on year (the single exception being 2002), from a peak of 9.8% in 1999 down to 7.7% in 2005.

Figure 6 UK Environmental Taxes 1994-2005


Source: UK Environmental Accounts Autumn 2006, Office of National Statistics

60. This year's Pre-Budget Report contained some key announcements of rises in and revalorisations of environmental taxes: Air Passenger Duty rates have been doubled, fuel duty rates have been revalorised (raised in line with inflation), and the Landfill Tax raised by £3 (in line with the existing Landfill Tax escalator, the Treasury's policy of increasing the tax of £3 per year). However, these rises and revalorisations come in the context of several years in which the majority of environmental taxes have been frozen (i.e., not revalorised, and therefore cut in real terms) at most Budgets (Figure 7). As we observed last year, this forms a contrast with the Financial Secretary's confirmation of the Government's "standing policy, as with every government in the past, is that we look each year at least to revalorize tax rates in order that they at least maintain their value."[77]

61. Overall, then, the picture is of an ongoing retreat from the Treasury's announcement in 1997 of a policy to shift the burden of taxation towards taxing environmentally damaging activities. As the latest figures show, the proportion of all taxation made up by green taxes is markedly less than in 1997, and is indeed at a lower proportion than as far back as 1994. This Pre-Budget does contain some limited announcements of rises in green taxes, but these are still very modest when set in the context of several Budgets and Pre-Budgets in recent years in which many environmental taxes have not even been raised in line with inflation.

Figure 7 Changes to five key environmental taxes since 2000-01




76   "Statement of Intent on Environmental Taxation", HM Treasury, 2 July 1997, www.hm-treasury.gov.uk Back

77   Environmental Audit Committee, Pre-Budget 2005: Tax, economic analysis, and climate change, Q 182 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 19 March 2007