Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Natural England

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  Natural England is a new organisation that was established under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006. We are a non-departmental public body formed by bringing together English Nature and parts of the Rural Development Service and the Countryside Agency.

  1.2  Natural England's purpose is to ensure that England's unique natural environment—its flora and fauna, land and seascapes, geology and soils—is conserved, enhanced, and managed for the benefit of present and future generations, thereby contributing to sustainable development.

2.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  2.1  The UK Climate Change Programme 2006 (UKCCP06) is too short-term in its approach to delivering emissions reductions. A more long-term focus will be needed to deliver a future statutory 60% reduction target.

  2.2  An example of the potential contribution that longer-term mitigation options can make is the role farmers can play as "carbon managers".

3.  NATURAL ENGLAND AND CLIMATE CHANGE

  3.1  Formulating effective responses to climate change, its causes and its effects, is a strategic priority for Natural England. Annex 1 outlines the scope of our climate change policy.

4.  RESPONSE TO INQUIRY ISSUES

  4.1  Natural England's response addresses Issue 5 cited in the Call for Evidence.

  4.2  In our view, the majority of policies in the UKCCP06 are short-term and designed with the primary aim of delivering the 2010 target. This has meant that longer-term measures, which might only become cost-effective after 2020, have generally been neglected.

  4.3  We agree that cost-effectiveness should be a consideration when assessing policy options to deliver emissions reductions, but that this assessment should be made over a longer time period in relation to the 2050 target.

  4.4  Farmers and land managers can potentially make an important contribution to climate change mitigation in the medium to long-term by:

    —  Maintaining, restoring and creating natural carbon sinks (such as peatlands and woodlands) which remove ("sequester") and store carbon from the atmosphere.

    —  Reducing the loss of carbon from soils to the atmosphere and water courses.

  4.5  There is growing evidence that a significant amount of carbon is being lost from UK soils. It appears that soils with high carbon content, such as peat, are loosing carbon at the fastest rates. This is concerning, as the UK's peatlands store around three billion tonnes of carbon and so keep an important reservoir of carbon out of the atmosphere.

  4.6  Some estimates suggest that the continued degradation of peat in the English uplands could result in some 380,000 tonnes of carbon being lost per annum, equivalent to around 2% of the UK's Kyoto commitment. The scale of carbon loss is in part due to unsustainable land management practices, such as drainage, over-burning and intensive grazing.

  4.7  If all of the upland peats in England were in a good ecological condition then they could instead sequester up to 40,000 tonnes of carbon per annum, by locking up carbon in the natural accumulation of peat.

  4.8  However, emissions reductions from carbon management practices generally take time to be realised. Peatland restoration programmes and management changes such as blocking drainage channels ("grips") and reducing the intensity of burning and grazing can, in the short to medium term, arrest the loss of soil carbon. However, if the peat has been damaged it will inevitably take time for natural functions to be re-established and for the peat to resume sequestration. To improve the evidence base in this area, Natural England is currently funding research in various locations in the uplands to quantify the carbon implications of peatland restoration schemes and changes to management practices.

  4.9  A wide range of mitigation measures will be required to stabilise atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases. The Government should not limit the available options through too narrow an approach to assessing cost-effectiveness. A key test should be that there is a high level of certainty that a mitigation measure will make a significant contribution to reducing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases over the next few decades.

  4.10  In our view, sustainable land management practices can improve the ability of the natural environment to provide essential goods and services, including climate regulation by sequestering and storing carbon. This contribution has the potential to be significant, especially when it is assessed over a long timeframe.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 30 July 2007