Select Committee on Environmental Audit Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60 - 64)

TUESDAY 17 APRIL 2007

MR GARETH STACE, MR ROGER SALOMONE, MR JEFF TETLOW, MR JOHN HILL AND MR DAVID MIDDLETON

  Q60  Mark Lazarowicz: What is your view of the suggestion of a three-year or even one-year budget or target?

  Mr Salomone: If you did go for a one-year budget, the budgets would be a hostage to fortune. You would be very likely to regularly miss those budgets because we all know that gas prices can spike, you can have different fluctuations in weather year-on-year, whereas over a five-year period those kinds of things are going to be more stable and I think if you did have the yearly budgets and those unforeseen fluctuations, whether it is in growth, weather or gas prices, you would probably end up borrowing from the next one quite heavily, and I do not think that is the idea of carbon budgeting.

  Q61  Mark Lazarowicz: What is the Business Council's view of that area?

  Mr Middleton: I think we would largely agree with what has just been said, sir. I think we are also worried about the issue of responsibility of reporting within the framework. As I mentioned earlier on, where does responsibility lie, and although we welcome five-year periods as being periods which stimulate investment and forward business planning, from a political dimension if the target has been set who, five years down the track, is responsible if that target is not achieved? We like the idea of this all going into statute but where does the responsibility lie in terms of accountability within Parliament as to who set the game in place in the first instance?

  Q62  Mark Lazarowicz: Can I ask one other question to the Business Council as well. You have a proposal in your paper for a carbon currency with the Committee on Climate Change setting interest rates. It is probably quite a complex proposal so unless you want to comment briefly on it today, it would be helpful, if you have any information or a paper giving more details about the proposals, if you could send that to the Committee.

  Mr Middleton: If I may say in response to that, Chairman, we like the idea but in all honesty we need to do a lot more work on it ourselves. We are very taken with the idea but please do not question us in detail about it yet. I would just put my hand up and say we have not done that. We would welcome the opportunity of doing that and we would welcome the opportunity of working with government to explore that idea further. If you can do it with monetary policy we think there is a similarity in terms of carbon value.

  Q63  Mark Lazarowicz: When you have looked at it in more detail and you think it works it would helpful to let us know!

  Mr Middleton: We would certainly like to come back to you.

  Mark Lazarowicz: Thank you.

  Q64  Joan Walley: On that point I think we will watch this space with interest. Can I thank each of you. It has been a very informative session and thank you for the work you do and for taking the time and coming along and sharing it with us today.

  Mr Middleton: Thank you very much for the opportunity, Chairman.

  Mr Salomone: Thank you.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 30 July 2007