Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Seventh Report


6  BRITISH WATERWAYS' COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES

70. British Waterways (BW) earned commercial income is now its biggest source of revenue and is likely to remain so in the future. In 2006-07, BW is expected to have a commercial gross income of about £100 million.[118] Figure 3 shows that about 34% of earned income in 2006-07 will come from BW's property development activities, 22% from utility sales, 19% from boat licence and mooring fees and 5% from joint venture profits.

Figure 3: British Waterways' primary sources of net income (commercial activity), 2006-07 forecast


Source: Ev 70 [British Waterways]

71. BW owns more than 1,700 properties worth a total of £520 million.[119] However, the 'In House Policy Consultancy's 2004-05 policy review of BW stated that BW's core business was the "stewardship of its waterways network".[120] Some witnesses told us that a tension existed between BW's commercial activities—particularly its interest in property development—and stewardship of the network. Boater Simon Greer said BW was "more interested in property development … and corporate survival than it is after looking after boaters or canals".[121] The Residential Boat Owners' Association said that BW's commercial activity has resulted in it "taking its eye off the ball" regarding stewardship of the network.[122]

72. Some witnesses were particularly concerned about the type of waterside developments and business deals BW was involved with. The Inland Waterways Association (IWA) said "unreasonable financial pressures" were forcing BW into "inappropriate dealings to over-commercialise the waterway network and asset-strip", and expressed doubt about whether BW's partnership with Scottish & Newcastle to develop a network of waterside pubs was suited to the waterways environment.[123] Boater John Keyes said that a lot of BW's developments were land-based offices and housing that did "not reflect the character, heritage or use of the waterways".[124]

73. When we questioned BW about some of these criticisms, BW stressed that it was a waterways company and argued forcefully that its property assets were "totally integral with the development of the waterways".[125] Its driver was the maintenance and preservation of its network, and all its money was spent on this.[126] Some witnesses supported BW's performance in this area: boater Sir Adrian Stott believed it would be "improper" for BW not to attempt to obtain the "best possible return from its assets".[127]

Our views

74. British Waterways is under immense pressure to generate income: income which ultimately funds the maintenance of the waterways network. BW has a difficult task in striking the right balance between its stewardship responsibilities and its commercial activities, especially property development. We note the concerns of many users of the waterways network that BW has not currently got this balance right. We recommend that BW develop an environmental heritage strategy for the waterways, in tandem with the Waterways Trust. This should involve all interested parties, and could be orchestrated through the British Waterways Advisory Forum.


118   British Waterways, Strategic Options Review, May 2007, para 4.2 Back

119   British Waterways, Annual Report & Accounts 2005-06, p 24 Back

120   In House Policy Consultancy, Policy Review of British Waterways, 2004-05, p1. The In House Policy Consultancy is based in the Department for Transport.It made recommendations agreed by the Review Steering Group to Defra and Scottish Executive Ministers.  Back

121   Ev 269, para 3 Back

122   Ev 310, para 12 Back

123   Ev 4, paras. 46 and 48 Back

124   Q 371 Back

125   Q 262 Back

126   Q 266 Back

127   Q 356 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 31 July 2007