Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Seventh Report


9  BRITISH WATERWAYS' RELATIONSHIP WITH ITS USERS

94. We heard mixed views about British Waterways' (BW) relationship with its users. Some users of the network were positive about the relationship. Boat owners Steve Davis and Paul Woollam said that they maintained "good and effective relations" with BW; Paul Woollam added that, in his experience, "most boaters" believed BW was making "significant progress towards improving the network".[169] Richard Clements, owner of two holiday-hotel boats on BW waters, also enjoyed a "constructive relationship" with BW management and staff, as did the Residential Boat Owners' Association.[170] The Association of Waterways Cruising Clubs told us that the creation of the British Waterways Advisory Forum (BWAF) had "greatly improved" BW's consultation processes with its users, a view shared by the British Marine Federation.[171] Sir Adrian Stott went further in stating that BW was now a "model organisation" in terms of consultation.[172]

95. A number of other boaters, however, were extremely critical about BW, particularly in respect of two issues. First, BW was said to communicate poorly with its users. Although generally supportive of BW, Paul Woollam believed that the organisation's communications were "not good".[173] Shire Cruisers described BW's communication with its industry about operational matters as "very poor", and blamed this on the recent grant reductions.[174] Other waterside businesses have also suggested BW's communications could be improved. The results of a survey of 825 waterside businesses in April 2006 showed that half thought BW dealt with them properly, with the majority noticing no improvement in service levels over the past two years.[175] Secondly, BW was criticised for not consulting properly—or at all—before making decisions, despite the existence of the BWAF. Paul Woollam said BW was "a long way behind the curve in stakeholder engagement".[176] The Commercial Boat Operators Association told us that it had not been consulted about the closure of BW's freight unit.[177] Other boaters criticised BW for insufficient consultation before making important business decisions, such as the closure of the Castle Mill boatyard in Oxford.[178]

96. BW described its relationships with waterway users as "generally good", although it was keen to develop customer service.[179] It recognised the importance of the boating community to the waterways movement, and said the organisation went "out of our way to have close relationships with them". When asked about its consultation processes, Robin Evans, the Chief Executive of BW, told us that BW worked hard to be "open and accountable" with its customers and users.[180] In the case of the closure of the central freight unit, he did not believe it had been necessary to consult because this was primarily an "operational issue" for BW.[181]

Our views

97. British Waterways can not be expected to please everyone, but our inquiry showed that many users of the network—especially boaters—are critical of the way BW operates, particularly in relation to communication and consultation. The structure of BW's consultative bodies is also somewhat confusing to outsiders and it is not always clear where real authority lies. Whilst we acknowledge that recent moves—such as the creation of the BW Advisory Forum—are in the right direction, BW needs to do more to develop an effective direct relationship with the users of its network, particularly those who are significant 'customers' such as boat residents, operators and licence holders.


169   Q 355 Back

170   Q 382; Ev 309.  Back

171   Ev 298; Ev 28. Back

172   Ev 138, para 5 Back

173   Q 365 Back

174   Ev 294, para 4.2 Back

175   "Initiative buoys up waterside business", Daily Telegraph, 10 April 2007, ', p 4. BW was reported as describing the findings as "less than satisfactory". Back

176   Q 365 Back

177   Q 218 Back

178   Q 373 [Simon Robbins]; Q 374 [John Keyes]; Ev 342 [Jericho Community Boatyard]; Ev 384 [Oxford City Council]; Q 369 [Del Brenner]; Ev 346 [Murad Qureshi] Back

179   Ev 68, para 2.7 Back

180   Q 353 Back

181   Q 350 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 31 July 2007