Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 580 - 599)

WEDNESDAY 23 MAY 2007

RT HON DAVID MILIBAND MP AND MR ROBIN MORTIMER

  Q580  Chairman: It is cap not the trade.

  David Miliband: If you do not trade, then what is the cap?

  Q581  Chairman: I am just looking from a hypothetical point of view of saying that the enabling powers have focused really on trading schemes and asking the question as to whether there needed to be a provision in the Bill that enabled you to do other thing if in the future—

  David Miliband: The answer I would give you is (1) they are a distinctive method, (2) there is nowhere else that allows you to cap and trade. So it is filling a gap in the market. I think those would be the two main reasons to give a straight answer to your question.

  Q582  Patrick Hall: In terms of other instruments, if as a result of the workings of the Committee and the Government's response or consideration of what the Committee is going to be saying over a period of years, it is thought that the planning system should be further changed, presumably that might be the recommendation from yourself or your successor, but then it is up to others in government to decide whether or not to move on that. So there would be possibly resistance or a time lag, would there not? The only direct thing that this Bill seems to be able to deliver on in terms of achieving outcomes is trading?

  David Miliband: Let me put it this way. If you have 100% of the economy's greenhouse gas emissions covered by trading schemes, then you would guarantee that you would live within your means.

  Q583  Patrick Hall: Is that a goal?

  David Miliband: I think "goal" is too strong, but I think it is quite an interesting thought experiment.

  Q584  Patrick Hall: It is going to be more than that soon.

  David Miliband: It is already more than that. It is already 50% of the economy. It is going to be 50% plus 6 or 7% if you include aviation. Once you have got the Carbon Reduction Commitment in, you have got another few per cent. So it is growing. You could say it is a vision rather than a goal.

  Q585  Patrick Hall: Once you get into personal allowances, that is massive leap into people's perceptions of how they are tied into that.

  David Miliband: Correct.

  Q586  Patrick Hall: I think there may be some fears of that?

  David Miliband: I think there is a lot of excitement about it.

  Q587  Patrick Hall: Excitement amongst some lobbyists; I am not sure about the public.

  David Miliband: Lobbyists; I do not know about that.

  Q588  Patrick Hall: The public may not be quite so keen.

  David Miliband: You mean that the public would not be keen on the idea that if they were environmentally thrifty they should be rewarded for it?

  Patrick Hall: How do you handle that, yes?

  Q589  Mr Cox: They might not be keen on the intrusion that would be needed to monitor it.

  David Miliband: That is a different point, one which I have advertised myself. Equally, ten years ago, if you had said that millions of people would have supermarket loyalty cards, they might have been worried about that.

  Q590  Mr Cox: That is voluntary.

  David Miliband: It is voluntary. None of that is a significant degree of information held about people.

  Q591  Mr Cox: No carbon allowance scheme is going to be voluntary, but, as you say, it is a compelling thought, is it not?

  David Miliband: Actually there are some voluntary carbon allowance schemes now. There are companies setting up their own schemes.

  Mr Cox: We are not talking about that, we are talking about a government imposed scheme?

  Q592  Chairman: Can we be clear that under the powers of this section you could introduce by secondary legislation personal carbon allowances?

  David Miliband: I think it is tricky. I think that that is on the edge.

  Q593  Chairman: So, not ruled out. We could do with a spot of clarification?

  David Miliband: It is on the edge is probably what I would say. We are clear we are really talking about things like the Carbon Reduction Commitment about heat. You can make the case that you wanted to get it in through this mechanism, but I think if you wanted to do the personal carbon card, you want to do it with a big song and dance and coverage of its own.

  Q594  Patrick Hall: I can hear The Daily Mail screaming about this already?

  David Miliband: I think if you wanted to do a carbon credit card, you would want to do that with full debate and engagement. You would not want to do it by the back door.

  Q595  Chairman: In the Bill you talk about allowances under your trading schemes in Schedule Two. It says: "The regulations must provide for the allowances to be allocated free of charge." In terms of the announced carbon reduction commitment, the message there is that that would be achieved by a simple fixed price sale of allowances.

  David Miliband: Give me the reference?

  Q596  Chairman: We are on page 24 in Schedule II of the Bill, clause 5(3)(a) says: "The regulations must provide for the allowances to be allocated free of charge." How is that compatible with the announced carbon reduction commitment proposal which says that there will be a simple fixed price sale of allowances?

  David Miliband: This is a good point. I think you know from other investigations that the Government is enthusiastic about auctioning of allowances, and we have made provision for 7% of EU ETS allowances to be auctioned, but it is done through the Finance Bill, not done through this Bill.

  Q597  Chairman: Would you say that again?

  David Miliband: It will be done through the Finance Bill rather than through this Bill.

  Q598  Chairman: But it sort of sets a precedent, does it not, that here is a scheme where you are going to sell something, and you have just enunciated the enthusiasm of the Government for selling, but the Bill says, in terms of these allowances, they are going to be allocated free of charge. There seems to be a policy incompatibility?

  Mr Mortimer: I think it is simply saying that this is not the legislative vehicle for doing auctioning, that the Finance Bill would be the appropriate solution for that, exactly as it has been used already for the EU ETS auctioning.

  Q599  Patrick Hall: The Finance Bill would do it?

  David Miliband: This Bill provides for all other aspects of setting up a scheme, but if it comes to a money issue or auctioning, that would be taken through the Finance Bill.

  Mr Gray: When it says "free of charge" it does not mean free of charge, it means somebody else will do it instead?


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 5 July 2007