Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Monica Akehurst (RAS 19)

  1.  I consider myself to be a grassroots farmer; I have strong views, and care passionately about the state of the farming industry today. I started my practical experience aged about five, due to having the smallest hands in the family, I took on the challenge of sorting out difficult lambings! These days I farm in partnership with my husband, farming Beef/Sheep and some corn, approximately 300 acres in total, of which we only own 44 acres. I appreciate the benefits of the farming way of life. I have no time for the whingers who are not prepared to do anything constructive to rectify the situation, there are too many takers and not enough givers. I have scanned "A Vision for the CAP" and confess to not being inspired by its reading.

  2.  My concerns for the industry are as follows. First and foremost, Regulations are stifling our industry. (This letter was submitted by me, and printed in The Farmers Guardian this week)

  3.  Where is the harm in wool? Can someone please explain to me why wool has been classified as a category 3 animal by product waste? Farmers are no longer allowed to burn or bury it. Surely wool is a natural fibre and is bio degradable. Humans wear it, I was glad of it this winter. Recent programmes on television, promote wool as a natural insulation that can be used in ecological and environmentally friendly new built houses. Also placing wool around the bottom of fruit trees has shown to be effective, keeping down the weeds, retaining moisture, and added nutrients. Indeed my grandfather always put the sheep daggings in the bottom of the trench when he planted his runner beans, and that seemed to grow a good crop of tasty beans to enjoy eating. Daggings are also useful for lining out hanging baskets!

  In the House of Lords, where legislation is considered before it becomes law, the presiding Lord Chancellor sits on a wool sack, stuffed with wool. It is thought to have been placed there during the reign of Edward III. It symbolised the importance of wool to the wealth of the nation. How times have changed, in my opinion not always for the better.

  4.  I cannot believe that wool is a danger to the environment. But now farmers have to pay for someone to take waste wool away from the farm to be incinerated, surely this is an unnecessary waste of energy? Can this really be right? Is it the most sensible option?

  5.  It is a clear illustration of unnecessary legislation that incurs extra costs for the farmer. Indeed it is impossible to keep pace with the raft of rules being heaped upon us, it leaves little time for tending to the stock and crops. Personally I regard farmers as a generally law abiding bunch, but recently I am willing to bet that honest genuine people have been turned into regulation breakers, often through no fault of their own. This situation can be very stressful—incidentally, stress or "freedom from it" is a basic animal right, farmers could do with less of it too! It is interesting to note that the reason most cited by farmers leaving this country to farm abroad is bureaucracy. It also acts as a deterrent to becoming a farmer, many of the younger generation do not want the hassle, and who can blame them.

  6.  Regarding waste regulation, why not look to the packaging and manufacturing companies, there is much that they could do to reduce waste. Moving on, it was not farmers that put the bonemeal into the animal feeds, they merely bought food sold as suitable for their animals to eat, yet it was farmers who appeared to take the blame for BSE. Foot and Mouth, where are the controls at the point of entry into this country to protect us against this disease? Meat continues to be imported from Brazil where this disease continues to be a real problem, is that sensible? It also would appear that farmers are carrying the wrap for drought and global warming which seems a little harsh. When will commonsense prevail, let the farmers get on with their job, the people who sit in offices and create rules appear to miss the point, that of course farmers will inherently, look after the environment because their very livelihood depends upon it, irrespective of what the authorities come up with.

  7.  Farmers image, needs overhauling!!

  8.  Lets get some facts straight, farmers are friend and not foe of the urban dweller, they produce a secure supply of tasty, quality, traceable, wholesome fresh food for people to enjoy at affordable prices, whilst also creating and maintaining the landscape of our beautiful British countryside for all to appreciate. The profile of farming needs raising, a more positive attitude. I respect my animals and the land that I farm and I would like respect for what I do. Perhaps, in the past, subsidies have created a complacent attitude accompanied by increased antagonism towards the farmer from government and public alike. Now maybe we can remove ourselves from the bottom of the pile. The British Farmer should be proud of what has been achieved in our industry. Food is a basic need, as a producer either through growing crops or breeding and raising stock, the farmer possesses a strength which should be built on. Consider how many other industries rely on the producer, not only the consumer but also the "inbetweenies". They are also an important part of the chain, but without us they would not exist. In the livestock business for example, there are the markets, abattoirs, buyers, processors, transporters, packers, distributors and ultimately the sellers, be they the small shop or large supermarket their business relies on the survival of our business. Unless the Government are happy to rely totally on imports, but at what cost, and how secure, let alone the extra food miles, which also incurs environmental pollution costs, is that what they want?

  9.  World wide the cost of fuel, and energy is rising, and pollution is of increasing concern. I feel that relying on others would not be good! In fact empty shelves could be catastrophic as there is worrying ignorance as to how food is produced, in the urban hi tech world.

  10.  In my experience a large number of the general public are interested in farming. This interest could be utilised to create positive vibe. There is a distinct lack of knowledge as to the realities of how food is produced. There is little in the way of education to rectify this, apart from some initiatives by farmers (farm Sunday, June 11th for example) which is to be applauded. There is little on the Television that shows accurate information about Farming. Countryfile is more concerned with environmental issues, although important does not feed the 60 million people in the U.K. or show a true reflection on how food is produced. Jimmy's farm has quite a following but he is not exactly a typical farmer. The Farmers weekly food miles campaign has proved to be a worthwhile initiative.

  11.  USE US or LOSE US, farmers are at risk of becoming a rare breed themselves, and with us will go the age old skills involved in country living, husbandry and ways of country folk. Big is not always beautiful, the small family farm is interwoven into the fabric, part of the culture of the British countryside. I like to think that being as we are an innovative, stubborn and resilient breed who are already used to adapting to cope with the elements and various challenges of today's climate, I hope that it will be possible to survive, but the politicians could do their part in helping to preserve this. Many farmers are asset rich cash poor. "If you look after the pennies the pounds will look after themselves", I feel that under the present Single Farm Payment system the large wealthy land owners will do very well. But the smaller working farmer, who does the work and produces the food, the graziers and tenant farmers, will have a struggle on their hands.

  12.  I am in favour of a fair playing field, but let's live in the real world. Most of our competitors are beneficiaries of agricultural support programmes, if worldwide support was removed perhaps it would be fair, as this is unlikely to happen, British farmers are going to be severely disadvantaged. I would simply like to get a fair price for my produce enough for my family to live on, cover the bills and enable me to stay in business, without unnecessary hangers on creaming money off my livelihood. Incidentally I had great difficulty persuading my husband to accompany me to see an independent consultant giving free farm business advice. I dread to think how much this cost Defra, but I had to admit that on this issue my husband was right Defra should save their money, it was a complete waste of valuable time We gained nothing from it that we did not already know, and simply received a typed letter afterwards telling us what we had told him. Not what I call constructive, but nothing ventured, nothing gained. There are in my opinion far too many people trying to live off our backs. Any help available needs to be carefully directed to where it is deserved, there is too much siphoning off going on.

  13.  If you have read this, thank you for taking the time to do so. I am sorry to disappoint but I do not possess the answers as to how the problems are resolved, I will leave that to the experts. However I would plead with you to include on your committee, someone who has a good working knowledge of the practicalities involved in farming and first hand experience of the agricultural industry. Not someone who is out to feather their own nest, but someone who truly cares for the industry, the environment and the well being of the British countryside. They should have a good sense of humour, integrity and above all possess a good measure of common sense, which is I fear sadly lacking in today's society. If you can find someone of this calibre, hopefully there will be a glimmer of hope for our industry.

June 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 24 May 2007