Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Tony Keene (RAS 15)

BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE

  1.  Tony Keene is a first generation farmer and the son of a businessman. He started farming in the 60s after doing National Service and a formal agricultural education. During his farming lifetime he has been involved in setting up a plant near Grantham to freeze peas and produce chips, now owned by McCains. He also had a business in Nottingham retailing potatoes direct to the housewife operating 11 vans. He developed a business in which he erected specialist potato stores to store 11,000 tonnes of potatoes for Walkers Crisps. He has been Chairman of a Farmers' Cooperative, a director of United Oilseeds Ltd, a member of the BBC Agricultural and Environmental Advisory Committee. He also served as a Governor of the Royal Agricultural College and was Chairman of the Farms Board and a past Chairman of the Oxford Farming Conference.

  2.  From a farm of 340 acres he increased the size of the business up to an acreage of 4,500. The acreage has since been trimmed back to 2,800 in order to consolidate the finances of the business to ensure that the business can endure these tough times. He has now handed over control of the business to his two daughters who have executive powers to run the businesses, which are situated in Leicestershire and Norfolk. He now has the luxury of being able to work when he wants to—which is quite a lot of the time.

THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY

  3.  The CAP by and large has served Europe well over the years but has now become outdated. We now live in a world of globalisation, which involves agriculture just as much as financial services, and the manufacture of industrial goods. We therefore have to change. The economics set the trend, which generally has to be followed. If the British farmer cannot compete financially he has no future. He only has a chance of competing on a world market if:

    (a)  His competitors, either in Europe or in the United States or anywhere else for that matter is not given financial advantages.

    (b)  If there were no support paid to British Farmers today the majority of the industry would be bust. Our farming at present only generates sufficient income to pay our actual rents or where we are owner occupiers a notional rent.

    (c)  If support is withdrawn in 2012 here and around the world, the assumption must be that commodity prices would rise to cover the cost of production and to generate some sort of return on capital employed; or the costs of production would drop or a combination of both. Hence the importance that world agriculture is uniformly treated.

    (d)  If farming is unprofitable production will decline until such time as prices rise to a level that enables farming to be profitable.

    (e)  As the standard of living around the world increases, so will the labour cost of producing food and if energy costs remain high, this will also affect the costs of moving food around the world hence giving an advantage to home produced food.

  4.  Politicians now have to decide:

    (f)  If farming were unprofitable what impact would this have on the environment and the countryside? Could agri-environmental schemes protect this environment and at the same time give farmers another source of income?

    (g)  Is the security of food supply an issue?

    (h)  To what extent can agriculture lessen the problem of global warming and can it contribute and help to lessen the dependence on oil and gas from unstable areas of the world?

  5.  However the over riding question is: Can British Agriculture survive without any outside support?

  6.  There is no doubt that if support were suddenly withdrawn there would be a mass shake out within the industry. Production of the commodities that have hitherto been supported would drop, rents would drop, the number employed in agriculture would drop and there would be an abrupt move to extensive low cost farming.

  7.  There is, however, a degree of attraction in letting economics decide the future of British Agriculture, but it seems to me that it is most unlikely that the French would adopt the same approach, as their farmers would not accept it and simply take to the roads and bring the country to a stand still. So how does the British Farmer compete with no subsidies when across the Channel the French and maybe the German farmers receive preferential treatment? The answer is simple. They will not be able to. Therefore Europe has to move together, unless British Governments are prepared to sacrifice the British Agricultural Industry.

June 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 24 May 2007